Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feminist Framings of Victim Advocacy in Criminal Justice Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Victimology

  • 1708 Accesses

Abstract

Trained professionals and volunteers have been key partners in the various developments in support of victims in the criminal justice system. Victim advocacy work is embryonic in this tradition and advocacy services can include offering information to victims, emotional support, help finding resources and completing paperwork, and accompanying victims to court. Concerns about the criminal justice response to rape have prompted the development of a number of different initiatives including victim advocacy services. This chapter draws upon research and evaluation studies of innovative advocacy services introduced to assist victims/survivors of rape to report to the police. Whilst findings suggest advocacy support improves victims’ experience of the criminal justice process and assists sustained engagement in this process, in some cases, it also facilitated making a report of rape to the police in the first instance. The chapter explores the nature, meaning and value of advocacy work from the perspective of practitioners delivering advocacy support and victims who have accessed advocacy services when reporting rape to the police. The chapter focuses on the benefits of advocacy that extend well beyond the emotional recovery of victims; advocacy also assists engagement in the criminal justice process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.caada.org.uk.

References

  • Allen, N. E., Bybee, D. L., & Sullivan, C. M. (2004). Battered Women’s Multitude of Needs. Violence Against Women, 10, 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Goodman, L. (2001). Supporting Battered Women Involved with the Court System: An Evaluation of a Law School-Based Advocacy Intervention. Violence Against Women, 7, 1377–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, K., Lesur, M., & Logar, R. (2014). Women Against Violence Europe Report 2014: Specialized Women’s Support Services and New Tools for Combating Gender-Based Violence in Europe. Vienna, Austria: WAVE Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Hay, O., & Burman, M. (2017). Reporting Rape: Victim Perspectives on Advocacy Support in the Criminal Justice Process. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17(2), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Hay, O., Burman, M., & Kyle, D. (2015). Evaluation of Support to Report Pilot Advocacy Service: Summary Report SCCJR Briefing Paper No.1/2015. Glasgow, UK: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Hay, O., Burman, M., Bradley, L., & Kyle, D. (2018). Evaluation of the Rape Crisis Scotland National Advocacy Project: Final Report. SCCJR Research Report. Glasgow, UK: Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, M. (2009). Evidencing Sexual Assault: Women in the Witness Box. Probation Journal, 56(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The Process Through Which an Advocacy Intervention Resulted in Positive Change for Battered Women Over Time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (2004). Helping Women Understand Their Risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1464–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. (2006). ‘Rape Survivors’ Experiences with the Legal and Medical Systems: Do Rape Victim Advocates Make a Difference? Violence Against Women, 12(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary Victimization of Rape Victims: Insights from Mental Health Professionals Who Treat Survivors of Violence. Violence and Victims, 14(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., Burton, M., Robinson, A. L., & Vallely, C. (2004). Evaluation of Specialist Domestic Violence Courts/Fast-Track Systems. London: Crown Prosecution Service and Department of Constitutional Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M., & Kelly. L. (2010). Islands in the Stream: An Evaluation of Four London Independent Domestic Abuse Advocacy Schemes. London: London Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M., & Kelly, L. (2011). Islands in the Stream: An Evaluation of Four London Independent Domestic Violence Advocacy Schemes. London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2011). Conventional and Innovative Justice Responses to Sexual Violence. ACSSA Issues No. 12. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, Australian Government: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010). Rape and Attrition in the Legal Process: A Comparative Analysis of Five Countries. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 565–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., & Epstein, D. (2008). Listening to Battered Women: A Survivor-Centered Approach to Advocacy, Mental Health, and Justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, J. E., Zimmer, B., Willis, G., & Silverman, J. G. (2008). Perceived Changes in Health and Safety Following Participation in a Health Care-Based Domestic Violence Program. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 53, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M., & Westmarland, N. (2005). Tackling Domestic Violence: Effective Interventions and Approaches. Home Office Research Study No. 290. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland. (2017). Thematic Review of the Investigation and Prosecution of Sexual Crimes. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Available at https://www.gov.scot/publications/thematic-review-investigation-prosecution-sexual-crimes/

  • Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. (2015). Complaints of Rape and the Criminal Justice System: Fresh Evidence on the Attrition Problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2005). Tackling Domestic Violence: Providing Advocacy and Support to Survivors from Black and Minority Ethnic Communities. Home Office Development and Practice Report 35. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, E., & Robinson, A. (2016). Responding Effectively to Women Experiencing Severe Abuse: Identifying Key Components of a British Advocacy Intervention. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, E., Stimpson, L., Barran, D., & Robinson, A. (2009). Safety in Numbers: A Multi-site Evaluation of IDVA Services. London: The Henry Smith Charity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A., & Worrall, J. (2007). The Voluntary Sector and Prisoners’ Resettlement. In L. Hagley-Dickinson & A. Hucklesby (Eds.), Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice (pp. 174–198). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J. (2002). ‘Will Any Woman Do? Police, Gender and Rape Victims’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25(2), 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2005). Promising Practices Addressing Sexual Violence, Expert Paper Prepared for the Expert Group Meeting on Violence Against Women: Good Practices in Combating and Eliminating Violence Against Women. UN Division for the Advancement of Women in collaboration with UN Office on Drugs and Crime, 17–20 May, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., & Humphreys, C. (2000). Reducing Domestic Violence? Outreach and Advocacy Approaches. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L. (2005). A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. Home Office Research Study 293. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, J., & Kelly, L. (2009). Different Systems, Similar Outcomes? Tracking Attrition in Reported Rape Cases Across Europe. London: CWASU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, J., Regan, L., & Kelly, L. (2004). Sexual Assault Referral Centres: Developing Good Practice and Maximising Potentials. Home Office Research Study 285. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, S. L. (2008). “I Have Heard Horrible Stories …”: Rape Victim Advocates’ Perceptions of the Revictimization of Rape Victims by the Police and Medical System. Violence Against Women, 14(7), 786–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. J. (2011). Gendered Organizations: Challenges for Domestic Violence Victim Advocates and Feminist Advocacy. Feminist Criminology, 6, 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. (2013). Meaning-Making and Domestic Violence Victim Advocacy: An Examination of Feminist Identities, Ideologies, and Practices. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. (2014). Feminist Advocacy: Gendered Organisations in Community-Based Responses to Domestic Violence. Plymouth: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, D. (2010). Supporting Victims Through the Legal Process: The Role of Sexual Assault Service Providers. ACSSA Wrap 8. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, A., Sampson, A., & Diamond, A. (2005). Tackling Domestic Violence: Providing Advocacy and Support to Survivors of Domestic Violence. Home Office Development and Practice Report 3. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Howie Associates. (2007). Evaluation of the Pilot Domestic Abuse Court. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2003). The Cardiff Women’s Safety Unit: A Multi-agency Approach to Domestic Violence. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2004). Domestic Violence MARACs (Multi-agency Risk Assessment Conferences) for Very High-Risk Victims in Cardiff, Wales: A Process and Outcome Evaluation. Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L. (2006). Reducing Repeat Victimisation Among High-Risk Victims of Domestic Violence: The Benefits of a Coordinated Community Response in Cardiff, Wales. Violence Against Women, 12(8), 761–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2009a). Independent Domestic Violence Advisers: A Process Evaluation. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (2009b). Independent Sexual Violence Advisers: A Process Evaluation. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Hudson, K. (2011). Different Yet Complementary: Two Approaches to Supporting Victims of Sexual Violence in the UK. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L., & Tregidga, J. (2007). The Perception of High-Risk Victims of Domestic Violence to a Coordinated Community Response in Cardiff, Wales. Violence Against Women, 13, 1130–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, N. (1988). Transcending Bureaucracy: Feminist Politics at a Shelter for Battered Women. Gender and Society, 2, 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saathoff, A., & Stoffel, E. (1999). Community Based Domestic Violence Services. Domestic Violence and Children, 9, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • SafeLives. (2016). A Cry for Health: Why We Must Invest in Domestic Abuse Services in Hospitals. Bristol: SafeLives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, S. (1982). Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women’s Movement. Boston, MA: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive. (2008). Glasgow Domestic Abuse Court Feasibility Study Group: Report to the Scottish Executive. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2017). National Scoping Exercise of Advocacy Services for Victims of Violence Against Women and Girls. Blake Stevenson Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F. (1999). Advocacy for Battered Women: Implications for a Coordinated Community Response. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating Community Responses to Domestic Violence: Lessons from Duluth and Beyond (pp. 115–125). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, T., & Taylor, H. (2009). Being Shut Out in the Dark Young Survivors’ Experiences of Reporting Rape and Sexual Assault. Feminist Criminology, 4(2), 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O., & Skinner, T. (2017). How Rape Myths are Used and Challenged in Rape and Sexual Assault Trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 441–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M., & Davis, L. (1991). A Shelter: An Organization Like Any Other? Affilia, 6, 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, N., & Humphreys, C. (2014). Multi-agency Risk Assessment and Management for Children and Families Experiencing Domestic Violence Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M. (1991). The Provision of Advocacy Services to Women Leaving Abusive Partners: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M. (2012). Advocacy Services for Women with Abusive Partners: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Harrisburg, PA: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. Retrieved March 16, 2020 from http://www.dvevidenceproject.org.

  • Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing Violence Using Community-Based Advocacy for Women with Abusive Partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Dunn, H. (2016). The Impact of Victim Advocacy on the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Offences: Lessons from a Realistic Evaluation. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research (SCCJR), School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland

    Michele Burman

  2. Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research (SCCJR), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland

    Oona Brooks-Hay

Authors
  1. Michele Burman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oona Brooks-Hay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Burman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK

    Jacki Tapley

  2. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Pamela Davies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burman, M., Brooks-Hay, O. (2020). Feminist Framings of Victim Advocacy in Criminal Justice Contexts. In: Tapley, J., Davies, P. (eds) Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42287-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42288-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation