Abstract
An increasing number of governments are using e-governance as a new form of communication with residents, information exchange, and accessibility with the goal of offering improved electronic services, improving quality of services, increased transparency, and cost reduction as traditional public services in today’s society do not meet citizen’s demands. E-governance is the use of information and communication technologies in the public sector to increase the public’s and interested parties’ interaction. Governmental websites are one of the key determents for public organizations to increase this interaction. Although there are enough explored conceptual access, technological innovation, to evaluate e-provision of services and the introduction of e-government, e-management of determinants is not yet understood. This chapter addresses the problems that arise when applying new public management at local self-government institutions. The actual situation and the options are compared.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bertot, J. C., Jager P. T., & McClure, C. (2008). Citizen-centered e-governance services: Benefits, costs and research needs (pp. 137–142). Montreal, Canada. [Online] Accessed January 02, 2017, from http://mcclure.ii.fsu.edu/publications/2008/Citizen-centered%20E-government%20services.pdf
Bowrey, J. (2006). The national strategy for local e-government in England (Localegov). [online] Accessed from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/egovernment/document/national-strategy-local-egovernment-england-localegov
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: University press.
Ipsos MORI. (2014). Hunting Poll. [online] Accessed from https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/hunting-poll-2014
Jansen, A. (2005). E-government progress: Why and what. [Online] Accessed November 13, 2016, from http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/jus/afin/FINF4001/h05/undervisningsmateriale/AJJ-nokobit2005.pdf
Kolsaker, A., & Lee-Kelly, L. (2016). Citizens’ attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 723–730. University of Surrey.
Local digital services. (2015). Better connected headlines. Soctim. [Online] Accessed December 29, 2016, from https://betterconnected.socitm.net/digital/headlines/2015
Navarra, D. D., & Cornford, T. (2006, September 11). The State, democracy and the limits of new public management: Exploring alternative models of e-government. In Proceedings of the eGovernment Workshop eGOV06 (p. 14). London.
Norris, F. D. (2007). Current issues and trends in e-government research. Advances in Electronic Government Research, (1), 10–30. University of Maryland.
Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191–205.
Reddick, C. G. (2010). Comparing citizens’ use of e-government to alternative service channels. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6(2), 54–67.
Sakowicz, M. (2004). How should E-government be evaluated? Different methodologies and methods. NISPAcee Occasional Papers in Public Administration and Public Policy, V(2), 18–25.
Saparniene, D. (2013a). From e-government to e-governance: Openness, partnership and democracy (pp. 88–100). Public Governance: Concepts and Dimensions. Vilnius: BMK.
The report of Lithuanian governmental websites. (2015). [Interactive]. Accessed January 06, 2017, from http://ivpk.lrv.lt/uploads/ivpk/documents/files/Veikla/Veiklos_sritys/Reikalavimai_interneto_svetainems/2015_m_tyrimas/Ataskaita.pdf
United Nations. (2015). Responsive and accountable public governance. World Public Sector Report, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. [online] Accessed from https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2015-world-public-sector-report.html
Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Osman, I., & Hind, I. N. (2013, December). E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks. Information Systems Frontiers. [Online] Accessed August 12, 2016, from http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/11795/3/Fulltext.pdf
Weiss, T. G. (2010). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rudyte, D., Kontrimaite, M. (2020). New Public Management at Local Self-Government Institutions. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Karabulut, G., Gözgor, G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 13/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40375-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40375-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40374-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40375-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)