Abstract
Global energy demand is projected to rise nearly 50% by 2040 (US EIA 2019). At the same time, emissions from continued use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, are causing unprecedented changes in climate patterns, leading to demonstrated physical, social, and financial risks to humans and the environment with more frequent and increasingly extreme weather events such as heat waves, intense storm systems, related natural disasters, and changes in ecology. The need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels is widely acknowledged, as indicated by the fact that nearly 200 countries have now signed the Paris Climate Agreement, pledging to limit rise in global emissions to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels to avoid catastrophic and irreversible climate change (UNFCCC 2015). While there has been significant advancement in research, development, and implementation of renewable energy technologies, these sources are not yet at scale to meet global energy demand. Strategies to conserve energy are therefore needed in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect human and environmental health. This chapter presents the argument for energy conservation in order to reduce fossil fuel extraction and consumption as improving efficiency alone is not sufficient to meet climate goals and energy supply needs. The discussion includes strategies that target individual or household behaviors to reduce or eliminate use of energy, such as turning off lights when not in use or choosing to walk rather than drive, but also ways to increase efficiency, such as replacing lightbulbs or appliances with models that use lower levels of energy, and on a larger scale, improved building design and rethinking urban planning and transportation systems. International bodies and national governments drive change by establishing policy and providing incentives to manage energy development and control consumption. At the household and local level, consumption can be targeted by behavioral change and adoption of technologies in homes and businesses to monitor and manage energy. This chapter discusses strategies at multiple scales but emphasizes community-based solutions that can play an important role in reducing consumption and accelerating the transition to a low-carbon energy system while enhancing community well-being, protection of human rights, and promotion of energy justice and equity.
References
Abatzoglou JT, Smith CM, Swain DL, Ptak T, Kolden CA (2020) Population exposure to pre-emptive de-energization aimed at averting wildfires in northern California. Environ Res Lett 15(9):094046. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aba135
Aczel MR, Makuch KE (2018a) The lay of the land: the public, participation and policy in China’s fracking frenzy. Extr Ind Soc 5(4):508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.001
Aczel MR, Makuch KE (2018b) An assessment of current regulation and suggestions for a citizen-centred approach to the governing of UK hydraulic fracturing. In: Energy, resource extraction and society. Routledge, London, pp 196–213
Ali A, Li W, Hussain R, He X, Williams BW, Memon AH (2017) Overview of current microgrid policies, incentives and barriers in the European Union, United States and China. Sustainability 9(7):1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071146
Ascione F (2017) Energy conservation and renewable technologies for buildings to face the impact of the climate change and minimize the use of cooling. Sol Energy 154:34–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.022
Auer MR (2021) Considering equity in wildfire protection. Sustain Sci 2021:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01024-8
Baloch ZA, Tan Q, Kamran HW, Nawaz MA, Albashar G, Hameed J (2022) A multi-perspective assessment approach of renewable energy production: policy perspective analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 24(2):2164–2192
Barnett B (2020, April 22) Slow Streets program [text]. SFMTA (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency). https://www.sfmta.com/projects/slow-streets-program
Baron J, Herzog S (2020) Public opinion on nuclear energy and nuclear weapons: the attitudinal nexus in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci 68:101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101567
Berman H, Shwom R, Cuite C (2019) Becoming FEW conscious: a conceptual typology of household behavior change interventions targeting the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus. Sustainability 11(18):5034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185034
Bliss L (2020, April 17) Drivers not wanted on Oakland’s “Slow Streets”. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-17/how-oakland-mad e-pedestrian-friendly-slow-streets
Brinkmann R (2019) Environmental sustainability in a time of change. Palgrave, New York
C2ES (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions) (2018) Resilience strategies for power outages. C2ES, Arlington. www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2018/08/resilience-strategies-power-outages.pdf
Camilleri AR, Larrick RP, Hossain S, Patino-Echeverri D (2019) Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nat Clim Change 9(1):53–58. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0354-z
City of San Francisco, Office of the Mayor (2021) Mayor London Breed announces new legislation to facilitate building housing on parking lots and garages [press release]. https://sfmayor.org/article/mayor-london-breed-announces-new-legislation-facilitate-building-housing-parking-lots-and
Dadzie J, Runeson G, Ding G, Bondinuba FK (2018) Barriers to adoption of sustainable technologies for energy-efficient building upgrade – semi-structured interviews. Buildings 8(4):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8040057
Davies DM, Verde MG, Mnyshenko O, Chen YR, Rajeev R et al (2019) Combined economic and technological evaluation of battery energy storage for grid applications. Nat Energy 4(1):42–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0290-1
de Groot JI, Schweiger E, Schubert I (2020) Social influence, risk and benefit perceptions, and the acceptability of risky energy technologies: an explanatory model of nuclear power versus shale gas. Risk Anal. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13457
Del Rio DDF, Sovacool BK, Griffiths S (2021) Culture, energy and climate sustainability, and smart home technologies: a mixed methods comparison of four countries. Energy Clim Change 2:100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100035
Diffenbaugh NS, Burke M (2019) Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(20):9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816020116
Dilkes-Hoffman LS, Lane JL, Grant T, Pratt S, Lant PA, Laycock B (2018) Environmental impact of biodegradable food packaging when considering food waste. J Clean Prod 180:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.169
Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C, Nilsson M, Barbier C et al (2019) It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Res Soc Sci 52:144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017) The new plastics economy – catalysing action. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/new-plastics-economy-catalysing-action
Eriksen C, Simon GL, Roth F, Lakhina SJ, Wisner B et al (2020) Rethinking the interplay between affluence and vulnerability to aid climate change adaptive capacity. Clim Change 162(1):25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02819-x
Fattibene D, Recanati F, Dembska K, Antonelli M (2020) Urban food waste: a framework to analyse policies and initiatives. Resources 9(9):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9090099
Franklin M, Kurtz C (2017) Lights out in the cold: reforming utility shut-off policies as if human rights matter (report). https://naacp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Lights-Out-in-the-Cold_NAACP-ECJP-4.pdf
Froese R, Schilling J (2019) The nexus of climate change, land use, and conflicts. Curr Clim Change Rep 5(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00122-1
Goldman J (2021) A new framework for transportation decarbonization. Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/blog-posts/a-new-framework-for-transportation-decarbonization/
Goldstein B, Gounaridis D, Newell JP (2020) The carbon footprint of household energy use in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117(32):19122–19130. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922205117
Harris J, Diamond R, Iyer M, Payne C, Blumstein C, Siderius HP (2008) Towards a sustainable energy balance: progressive efficiency and the return of energy conservation. Energ Effic 1(3):175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9011-0
Hauck M, Ait Sair A, Steinmann Z, Visschedijk A, O’Connor D, Denier van der Gon H (2019) Future European shale gas life-cycle GHG emissions for electric power generation in comparison to other fossil fuels. Carbon Manag 10(2):163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1571529
Hitaj C, Xiarchos IM, Coupal R, Kelsey TW, Krannich RS (2020) Shale gas and oil development: a review of the local environmental, fiscal, and social impacts [preprint]. Econ Energy Environ Policy 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.9.1.chit
Hoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N (2020) The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: a study of 108 US urban areas. Climate 8(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8010012
Hoicka CE, Lowitzsch J, Brisbois MC, Kumar A, Camargo LR (2021) Implementing a just renewable energy transition: policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities. Energy Policy 156:112435
Holmes MR, Dodds R, Frochot I (2021) At home or abroad, does our behavior change? Examining how everyday behavior influences sustainable travel behavior and tourist clusters. J Travel Res 60(1):102–116
Howarth RW (2014) A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas. Energy Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.35
Howarth RW (2019) Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? Biogeosciences 16(15):3033–3046. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1-2019
Hsu A, Sheriff G, Chakraborty T, Manya D (2021) Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities. Nat Commun 12:2721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22799-5
IEA (2019) World Energy Outlook 2019. http://www.iea.org/weo
IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–31. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdf
IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
IPCC (2019) Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/
IPCC (2021) Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (in press). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/
Johnsson F, Kjärstad J, Rootzén J (2019) The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Clim Policy 19(2):258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1483885
Jones C, Kammen DM (2014) Spatial distribution of US household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environ Sci Technol 48(2):895–902. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4034364
Kartha S, Caney S, Dubash NK, Muttitt G (2018) Whose carbon is burnable? Equity considerations in the allocation of a “right to extract”. Clim Change 150(1):117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2209-z
Khan N, Jhariya MK, Raj A, Banerjee A, Meena RS (2021) Eco-designing for sustainability. In: Ecological intensification of natural resources for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 565–595
Kramer A (2018) The unaffordable city: housing and transit in North American. Cities 83:1–10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275117310855
Lacroix K, Gifford R (2018) Psychological barriers to energy conservation behavior: the role of worldviews and climate change risk perception. Environ Behav 50(7):749–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517715296
Lelieveld J, Klingmüller K, Pozzer A, Burnett RT, Haines A, Ramanathan V (2019) Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(15):7192–7197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819989116
Lento J, Gray MA, Ferguson AJ, Curry RA (2020) Complementary responses of stream fish and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages to environmental drivers in a shale-gas development area. FACETS 5(1):200–227. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0024
Levenda AM, Behrsin I, Disano F (2021) Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies. Energy Res Soc Sci 71:101837
Manavalan E, Jayakrishna K (2019) An analysis on sustainable supply chain for circular economy. Procedia Manuf 33:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.059
Mattioli G, Roberts C, Steinberger JK, Brown A (2020) The political economy of car dependence: a systems of provision approach. Energy Res Soc Sci 66:101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486
Morawicki RO, Diaz González DJ (2018) Food sustainability in the context of human behavior. Yale J Biol Med (91)2:191–196. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020726/
Nachmany M, Abeysinghe A, Barakat S (2017) Climate change legislation in the least developing countries. In: Averchenkova A, Fankhauser S, Nachmany M (eds) Trends in climate change legislation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, pp 59–82
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS) (2021) Enhancing community resilience through social capital and social connectedness: stronger together! The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/26123
Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB (2019) Losing ground in protected areas? Science 364(6443):832–833. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6392
Neumayer E (2000) In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 33(2):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X
NOAA (n.d.) Severe weather awareness: heat waves. https://www.weather.gov/mkx/heatwaves
Oduro Appiah J, Opio C, Donnelly S (2020) Quantifying, comparing, and contrasting forest change pattern from shale gas infrastructure development in the British Columbia’s shale gas plays. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 27(2):114–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1649313
Olawuyi DS (2021) Can MENA extractive industries support the global energy transition? Current opportunities and future directions. Extr Ind Soc 8(2):100685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.02.003
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) (2021) Decommissioning Diablo Canyon Power Plant in 2025. https://www.pge.com/en_US/safety/how-the-system-works/diablo-canyon-power-plant/diablo-canyon-power-plant/diablo-decommissioning.page
Palm J, Reindl K (2018) Understanding barriers to energy-efficiency renovations of multifamily dwellings. Energy Effic 11:53–65. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-017-9549-9
Peffer T, Pritoni M, Meier A, Aragon C, Perry D (2011) How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Build Environ 46(12):2529–2541
Ribeiro D, Mackres E, Baatz B, Cluett R Jarrett M, Kelly M, Vaidyanathan S (2015) Enhancing community resilience through energy efficiency. ACEEE, Washington, DC. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u1508
Rudick R (2020a, April 14) Eyes on the street: a quick look at Oakland’s “Slow Streets”. Streetsblog San Francisco. https://sf.streetsblog.org/2020/04/14/eyes-on-the-street-a-quick-look-at-oaklands-slow-streets/
Rudick R (2020b, April 21) San Francisco picks 12 “Slow Streets”. Streetsblog San Francisco. https://sf.streetsblog.org/2020/04/21/san-francisco-picks-12-slow-streets
Seritan AL, Seritan I (2020) The time is now: climate change and mental health. Acad Psychiatry 44(3):373–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01212-1
Short D (2020) Energy harms: “extreme energy”, fracking and water. In: Brisman A, South N (eds) Routledge international handbook of green criminology. Routledge, London, pp 463–480
Short D, Szolucha A (2019) Fracking Lancashire: the planning process, social harm and collective trauma. Geoforum 98:264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.001
Short D, Elliot J, Norder K, Lloyd-Davies E, Morley J (2015) Extreme energy, “fracking” and human rights: a new field for human rights impact assessments? Int J Hum Rights 19(6):697–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1019219
Shukla PR (2019) Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change: a developing country perspective. In: Toth F (ed) Fair weather? Routledge, London, pp 145–159
Sovacool BK (2014) Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew Sust Energy Rev 37:249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068
Sovacool BK, Del Rio DF, Griffiths S (2021) Policy mixes for more sustainable smart home technologies. Environ Res Lett 16(5):054073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe90a
UNEP (2020) Emissions gap report 2020: executive summary. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020
UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Report no. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, United Nations. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
US DOE (2017) Energy saver guide. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/articles/energy-saver-guide
US DOE (2019) The efficiency-resilience nexus. DOE, Washington, DC. https://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/DOE%20BB%20Resilience.pdf
US DOE (n.d.) About the commercial buildings integration program. https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/about-commercial-buildings-integration-program
US EIA (2019) EIA projects nearly 50% increase in world energy usage by 2050, led by growth in Asia. Today in Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=41433
US EIA (2020) Fossil fuels account for the largest share of U.S. energy production and consumption. Today in Energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45096
US EIA (2021a) What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source?. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
US EIA (2021b) Nuclear explained U.S. nuclear industry. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/us-nuclear-industry.php
US EPA (n.d) Local energy efficiency benefits and opportunities. https://www.epa.gov/statelocalenergy/local-energy-efficiency-benefits-and-opportunities
Williams L, Sovacool BK (2019) The discursive politics of “fracking”: frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Glob Environ Change 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101935
Wood N, Roelich K (2019) Tensions, capabilities, and justice in climate change mitigation of fossil fuels. Energy Res Soc Sci 52:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.014
York D, Jarrah A (2020) Community resilience planning and clean energy initiatives: a review of city-led efforts for energy efficiency and renewable energy. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u2002
York D, Baatz B, Ribeiro D (2016) The role of electric utility energy efficiency programs in building community resilience. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings 11, pp 1–12. aceee.org/files/proceedings/2016/data/papers/11_366.pdf
Zwickl K (2019) The demographics of fracking: a spatial analysis for four US states. Ecol Econ 161:202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aczel, M. (2022). Energy Conservation. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_21-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_21-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences