Skip to main content

Abstract

Wheat, barley and rye are sources of gluten and diverse food products are made from the grains of these cereals. Despite some species-specific differences, the molecular properties of the gluten proteins show similar characteristics in forming a unique protein network that has been extensively described in terms of its subunits and composition, its function in bakery products and its implications for human health.

There are many reasons for analysing gluten to serve purposes as diverse as assessing flour quality, selecting and breeding suitable cereal varieties, identifying varieties, identifying the source of gluten in a product, and quantifying gluten in food and drink, especially to protect gluten intolerant consumers.

The level of gluten in food and drink deemed to be safe for people with coeliac disease or non-coeliac gluten sensitivity is set in legislations. Various systems are in place worldwide to regulate food labelling and various testing methods are used or are available to quantify gluten, but cross-border standardisation to harmonize the quantification of gluten in food products has yet to be agreed.

To analyse gluten, the proteins must be separated from other possibly interfering food components. As it is difficult to solubilize gluten, gluten extraction is a critical part of the process. The level of gluten, the type of food matrix and the available technology impose further limitations and challenges.

In this chapter, we describe a strategy to select the most suitable gluten analysis approach according to the purpose, sample type, gluten level and performance characteristics required. The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative gluten analysis techniques, such as gel electrophoresis, immunoassays, asymmetric field flow fractionation multi-angle laser light scattering, chromatography and chromatography coupled methods are covered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghagholizadeh R, Kadivar M, Nazari M, Mousavi F, Azizi MH, Zahedi M, Rahiminezhad MR (2017) Characterization of wheat gluten subunits by liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry and their relationship to technological quality of wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 76: 229–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allred LK, Sealey-Voyksner JA and Voyksner RD (2014) Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative immunoassays to detect barley contamination in gluten-free beer with confirmation using LC-MS/MS. Journal of AOAC International 97(6): 1615–1625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altenbach SB, Vensel WH, DuPont FM (2010) Analysis of expressed sequence tags from a single wheat cultivar facilitates interpretation of tandem mass spectrometry data and discrimination of gamma gliadin proteins that may play different functional roles in flour. BMC Plant Biol 10: 7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alves TO, D’Almeida CTS, Ferreira MSL (2017) Determination of Gluten Peptides Associated with Celiac Disease by Mass Spectrometry, In “Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity” Publisher: InTech DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/67547

  • Batey IL, Gupta RB, MacRitchie F (1991) Use of size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography in the study of wheat flour proteins: an improved chromatographic procedure. Cereal Chemistry 68: 207–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biomedal (2017) https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2017/11/24/Biomedal-targets-gluten-detection-and-quantification. Last accessed in Nov 2018.

  • Boison J, Allred L, Almy D, Anderson L, Baumert J, Bhandari S, Cebolla A, Chen Y, Crowley E, Diaz-Amigo C, Doi H, Don C, Downs M, Dubiel N, et al. (2018) Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs®) 2017.021: Quantitation of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Gluten in Oats. J AOAC Int 101(4): 1238–1242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bönick J, Huschek G, Rawel HM (2017) Determination of wheat, rye and spelt authenticity in bread by targeted peptide biomarkers. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 58, 82–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Branlard G, Picard B, Courvoisier C (1990) Electrophoresis of gliadins in long acrylamide gels: Method and nomenclature. Electrophoresis 11: 310–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branlard G, Lesage VS, Bancel E, Martre P, Méleard B, Rhazi L (2015) Coping with wheat quality in a changing environment - Proteomics evidence for stress caused by environmental changes. In “Advances in Wheat Genetics: From Genome to Field. Proceedings of the 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium” (Y. Ogihara, S. Takumi, H. Handa Eds), Yokohama, Japan, 8-14 September 2013. ISBN: 978-4-431-55674-9, 255-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow SNL, Gethings LA, Langridge J, Shewry PR, Buckley M, Bromley MJ, Mills ENC (2017a) Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling of Wheat Glutens using a Combination of Data-Independent and Data-Dependent Acquisition. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow S, Gethings LA, Buckley M, Bromley M, Shewry PR, Langridge JI, Clare Mills EN (2017b) A curated gluten protein sequence database to support development of proteomics methods for determination of gluten in gluten-free foods. Journal of Proteomics 163: 67–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bruins Slot ID, Fels-Klerx HJ, Bremer MGE G, Hamer RJ (2015) Evaluating the performance of gluten ELISA test kits: The numbers do not tell the tale. Cereal Chemistry 92: 513–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruins Slot ID, Fels-Klerx HJ, Bremer MGE G, Hamer RJ (2016) Immunochemical Detection Methods for Gluten in Food Products: Where Do We Go from Here? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56: 2455–2466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bugyi Z, Török K, Hajas L, Adonyi Z, Poms RE, Popping B, Diaz-Amigo C, Kerbach S, Tömösközi S (2012) Development of incurred reference material for improving conditions of gluten quantification. Journal of AOAC International 95: 382–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bugyi Z, Török K, Hajas L, Adonyi Z, Popping B, Tömösközi S. (2013) Comparative study of commercially available gluten ELISA kits using an incurred reference material. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 5: 79–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Watson D, Bakke M, Panda R, Bedford B, Kande PS, Jackson LS, Garber EAE (2017) Detection of Gluten during the Fermentation Process To Produce Soy Sauce. Journal of Food Protection 80(5): 799–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission, Foods for Special Dietary Use for Persons Intolerant to Gluten. Rome, Italy, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgrave ML, Goswami H, Byrne K, Blundell M, Howitt CA, Tanner GJ (2015) Proteomic profiling of 16 cereal grains and the application of targeted proteomics to detect wheat contamination. Journal of Proteome Research 14: 2659–2668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornec M, Popineau Y, Lefebvre J (1994) Characterisation of Gluten Subfractions by SE-HPLC and Dynamic Rheological Analysis in Shear. Journal of Cereal Science 19(2): 131–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deora NS (2018) Current detection and quantification method for gluten to support the gluten-free claim: an insight about ELISA method. Journal of Nutritional Health & Food Engineering 8: 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Amigo C, Popping B (2012) Gluten and gluten-free: issues and considerations of labeling regulations, detection methods, and assay validation. J. AOAC Int. 95: 337–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Amigo C, Popping B (2013) Accuracy of ELISA detection methods for gluten and reference materials: a realistic assessment. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61: 5681–5688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dostalek P, Hochel I, Mendez E, Hernando A, Gabrovska D (2006) Immunochemical determination of gluten in malts and beers. Food Addit Contam 23: 1074–1078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dumur J, Jahier J, Bancel E, Laurière M, Bernard M, Branlard G (2004) Proteomic analysis of aneuploid lines in the homeologous group 1 of the hexaploid wheat cultivar Courtot. Proteomics 4: 2685–2695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuPont FM, Chan R, Lopez R, Vensel WH (2005) Sequential extraction and quantitative recovery of gliadins, glutenins, and other proteins from small samples of wheat flour. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 1575–1584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fallahbaghery A, Zou W, Byrne K, Howitt CA, Colgrave ML (2017) A Comparison of Gluten Extraction Protocols Assessed by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Joural of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 2857–2866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler KL, McGrath SC, Callahan JH, Ross MM (2014) Characterization of Grain-Specific Peptide Markers for the Detection of Gluten by Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62: 5835–5844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García E, Llorente M, Hernando A, Kieffer R, Wieser H, Méndez E (2005) Development of a general procedure for complete extraction of gliadins for heat processed and unheated foods. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17: 529–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-Molina MD, Barro F (2017) Characterization of Changes in Gluten Proteins in Low-Gliadin Transgenic Wheat Lines in Response to Application of Different Nitrogen Regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 8: 257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goze P, Rhazi L, Lakhal L, Jacolot P, Pauss A, Aussenac T (2017) Effects of ozone treatment on the molecular properties of wheat grain. Journal of Cereal Science 75: 243–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glutentox. http://www.keydiagnostics.com.au/images/PDF/new/GlutenTox%20Reader/GlutenTox_Reader_Brochure_KD_12-14.pdf Last accessed in Nov 2018.

  • Guo B, Luan H, Lin S et al. (2016) Comparative proteomic analysis of two barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.) with contrasting grain protein content. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han C, Lu X, Yu Z, Li X, Ma W & Yan Y (2015) Rapid separation of seed gliadins by reversed-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UPLC) and its application in wheat cultivar and germplasm identification. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 79: 808–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haraszi R, Chassaigne H, Maquet A, Ulberth F (2011) Analytical methods for detection of gluten in food - method developments in support to the legislations on labelling of foodstuffs. Journal of AOAC International 94: 1006–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hlywiak KH (2008) Hidden sources of gluten. Practical Gastroenterology, In: Celiac disease: a comprehensive review and update, series #2, Eds: Muralidhar Jatla, M.D., Ritu Verma, M.D., pp. 27-34, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda TM, Araki E, Fujita Y, Yano H (2006) Characterization of low-molecular-weight glutenin subunit genes and their protein products in common wheats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112: 327–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda TM, Branlard G, Peña RJ, Takata K, Liu L, He ZH, Lerner SE, Kolman MA, Yoshida H, Rogers WJ (2008) International collaboration for unifying Glu-3 nomenclature systems in common wheat. Proc 11th Int Wheat Genet Symp, Sydney University Press, Sydney, Australia O42.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (2018) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding through a fully annotated and anchored reference genome sequence. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7191.

  • Juhász A, Haraszi R, Békés F, Skylas DJ, Wrigley CW (2015a) Proteomic Analysis Relevant to Cereal Grains. In H. Corke, J. Faubion, K. Seetharaman and C. Wrigley (Ed.), Encyclopedia of food grains (pp. 146–153) Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhász A, Haraszi R, Maulis CS (2015b) ProPepper: a curated database for identification and analysis of peptide and immune-responsive epitope composition of cereal grain protein families, Database, Volume 2015, 2015, bav100, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav100

  • Khamis M (2014) Characterization and evaluation of heat-treated wheat flours. PhD thesis, Department of Grain Science and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner TB, Abbott M, Godefroy SB, Popping B, Yeung JM, Diaz-Amigo C, Roberts J, Taylor SL, Baumert JL, Ulberth F, Wehling P, Koehler P (2013) Validation procedures for quantitative gluten ELISA methods: AOAC allergen community guidance and best practices. Journal of AOAC International 96: 1033–1040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne MT, Aucamp U (2004) The use of size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) for wheat quality prediction in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 21:1, 8–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larroque OR, Sharp P, Bekes F (2007) Molecular Weight Distribution of Gluten Proteins. In: Buck HT, Nisi JE, Salomón N (eds) Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemelin E, Aussenac T, Salvo I, Quandalle C (2002) Size characterization of wheat proteins by asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation and multi-angle laser light scattering. AACC Annual meeting, Montreal, Québec 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemelin E, Branlard G, Salvo L, Lein V, Aussenac T, Daydé J (2005) Breadmaking stability of wheat flours: relation between mixing properties and molecular weight distribution of polymeric glutenins. Journal of Cereal Science 42: 317–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lexhaller B, Tompos C, Scherf KA (2017) Fundamental study on reactivities of gluten protein types from wheat, rye and barley with five sandwich ELISA test kits. Food Chemistry 237: 320–330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Byrne K, Galiamov R, Mendoza-Porras O, Bose U, Howitt CA, Colgrave ML (2018) Using LC-MS to examine the fermented food products vinegar and soy sauce for the presence of gluten. Food Chemistry 254: 302–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Byrne K., Howitt CA, Colgrave ML (2019) Efficient Extraction and Digestion of Gluten Proteins. In: Wang X, Kuruc M (eds) Functional Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1871. Humana Press, New York, NY, 405–412.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liao YS, Kuo JH, Chen BL, Tsuei HW, Lin CY, Hsu-Yang L, Hwei-Fang C (2017) Development and Validation of the Detection Method for Wheat and Barley Glutens Using Mass Spectrometry in Processed Foods. Food Anal. Methods. 10: 2839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Ikeda TM, Branlard G, Peña RJ, Rogers WJ, Lerner SE, Kolman MA, Xia X, Wang L, Ma W, Appels R, Yoshida H, Wang A, Yan Y, He Z (2010) Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE. MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat. BMC Plant Biol 10: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock S (2014) Gluten detection and speciation by Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Foods 3: 13–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lookhart GL, Albers LD, Bietz JA (1986) Comparison of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography analysis of gliadin polymorphism in the wheat cultivar ‘Newton. Cereal Chemistry 63: 497–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lookhart GL, Bean SR (1995) Separation and characterization of wheat protein fractions by high-performance capillary electrophoresis. Cereal Chemistry 72: 527–532.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lookhart GL, Bean SR, Bietz JA (2003) Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography in grain applications. Cereal Foods World 48: 9–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi A, Mattarozzi M, Giannetto M, Careri M (2015) Multiplex liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of wheat, oat, barley and rye prolamins towards the assessment of gluten-free product safety. Analytica Chimica Acta, 895: 62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Esteso MJ, Nørgaard J, Brohée M, Haraszi R, Maquet A, O’Connor G (2016) Defining the wheat gluten peptide fingerprint via a discovery and targeted proteomics approach. Journal of Proteomics 147: 156–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Esteso MJ, Brohee M, Norgaard J, O’Connor G (2017) Label-free proteomic analysis of wheat gluten proteins and their immunoreactivity to ELISA antibodies. Cereal Chemistry 94: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melini F, Melini V, Luziatelli F, Ruzzi M (2017) Current and Forward-Looking Approaches to Technological and Nutritional Improvements of Gluten-Free Bread with Legume Flours: A Critical Review. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. 16: 1101–1122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melini F, Melini V (2018) Immunological Methods in Gluten Risk Analysis: A Snapshot, Safety. 4: 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mena MC, Lombardía M, Hernando A, Méndez E, Albar JP (2012) Comprehensive analysis of gluten in processed foods using a new extraction method and a competitive ELISA based on the R5 antibody. Talanta 91: 33–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mena MC, Sousa C (2015) Analytical Tools for Gluten Detection. Policies and Regulation. In: Arranz E, Fernández-Bañares F, Rosell CM, Rodrigo L, Peña AS, editors. Advances in the Understanding of Gluten Related Pathology and the Evolution of Gluten-Free Foods. Barcelona, Spain: Omnia Science pp. 527–564.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metakovsky EV, Novoselskaya AY (2001) Gliadin allele identification in common wheat. I. Methodological aspects of the analysis of gliadin pattern by one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Journal of Genetics & Breeding 45: 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metakovsky E, Melnik V, Rodriguez-Quijano M, Upelniek V, Carrillo JM (2018) A catalog of gliadin alleles: Polymorphism of 20th-century common wheat germplasm. The Crop Journal 6: 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne TB (1924) The Vegetable Proteins, 2nd Edition, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda R, Zoerb HF, Cho CY, Jackson LS, Garber EAE (2015) Detection and Quantification of Gluten during the Brewing and Fermentation of Beer Using Antibody-Based Technologies, Journal of Food Protection. 78: 1167–1177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peña RJ, Gonzalez-Santoyo H, Cervantes F (2004) Relationship between Glu-D1/Glu-B3 allelic combinations and bread-making quality-related parameters commonly used in wheat breeding. In: Masci S., Lafiandra, D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th Gluten Workshop. Viterbo, 156-157b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Preston K, Krokhin O, Mellish J, Ens W (2008) Characterization of Wheat Gluten Proteins by HPLC and MALDI TOF Mass Spectrometry. Journal of The American Society of Mass Spectrometry 19: 1542–1550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Real A, Comino I, de Lorenzo L, Merchán F, Gil-Humanes J, et al.. (2012) Molecular and Immunological Characterization of Gluten Proteins Isolated from Oat Cultivars That Differ in Toxicity for Celiac Disease. PLoS ONE 7: e48365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rzychon M, Brohée M, Cordeiro F, Haraszi R, Ulberth F, O’Connor G (2017) The feasibility of harmonizing gluten ELISA measurements. Food Chemistry 234: 144–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sajic N, Oplatowska-Stachowiak M, Streppel L, Drijfhout JW, Salden M, Koning F (2017) Development and in-house validation of a competitive ELISA for the quantitative detection of gluten in food. Food Control, 80: 401–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satsuki-Murakami T, Kudo A, Masayama A, Ki M, Yamano T (2018) An optimized extraction method for gluten analysis in cacao-containing products using an extraction buffer with polyvinylpyrrolidone. Food Control 84: 70–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk K, Koehler P, Scherf KA (2018) Targeted liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to quantitate wheat gluten using well-defined reference proteins. PLoS ONE 13: e0192804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk K, Lang C, Wieser H, Koehler P, Scherf KA (2017a) Quantitation of the immunodominant 33-mer peptide from α-gliadin in wheat flours by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Sci Rep.; 7: 45092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk K, Lexhaller B, Koehler P, Scherf KA (2017b) Isolation and characterization of gluten protein types from wheat, rye, barley and oats for use as reference materials. PLoS ONE 12: e0172819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scherf KA (2016) Impact of the preparation procedure on gliadin, glutenin and gluten contents of wheat starches determined by RP-HPLC and ELISA. Eur Food Res Technol 242: 1837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schopf M, Scherf KA (2018) Wheat cultivar and species influence variability of gluten ELISA analyses based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies R5 and G12. Journal of Cereal Science 83: 32–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey-Voyksner JA, Khosla C, Voyksner RD, Jorgenson JW (2010) Novel aspects of quantitation of immunogenic wheat gluten peptides by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 18;1217: 4167-83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma GM (2012) Immunoreactivity and detection of wheat proteins by commercial ELISA kits. J. AOAC Int. 95: 364–371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonato B, Mainente F, Tolin S, Pasini G (2011) Immunochemical and mass spectrometry detection of residual proteins in gluten fined red wine. J Agric Food Chem 59: 3101–3110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK, Shepherd KW, Cornish GB (1991) A simplified SDS-PAGE procedure for separating LMW subunits of glutenin. J. Cereal Sci 14: 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan B, Focke-Tejkl M, Weber M et al. (2015) Usefulness of recombinant γ-gliadin 1 for identifying patients with celiac disease and monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136: 1607–1618.e3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner GJ, Blundell MJ, Colgrave ML, Howitt CA (2016) Creation of the first ultra-low gluten barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) for coeliac and gluten-intolerant populations. Plant Biotechnol J 14: 1139–1150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tatham AS, Gilbert SM, Fido RJ, Shewry PR (2000) Extraction, Separation, and Purification of Wheat Gluten Proteins and Related Proteins of Barley, Rye, and Oats, Methods in Molecular Medicine, Vol. 41: Celiac Disease: Methods and Protocols, Ed: M. N. Marsh © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ pages 55-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SL, Nordlee JA, Jayasena S, Baumert JL (2018) Evaluation of a Handheld Gluten Detection Device. J Food Prot. 81: 1723–1728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torok K, Hajas L, Bugyi Z, Balazs G, Tomoskozi S (2015) Investigation of the effects of food processing and matrix componentson the analytical results of ELISA using an incurred gliadin reference material candidate. Acta Aliment. 44: 390–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck HC, Cordewener JHG, Nessen MA, America AHP, van der Meer IM (2015) Label free targeted detection and quantification of celiac disease immunogenic epitopes by mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 60-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck HC, America AHP, Smulders MJM, Bosch D, Hamer RJ, Gilissen L, van der Meer IM (2009) A modified extraction protocol enables detection and quantification of celiac disease-related gluten proteins from wheat. J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877: 975–982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser H, Koehler P (2009) Is the calculation of the gluten content by multiplying the prolamin content by a factor of 2 valid? Eur. Food Res. Technol. 229: 9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zilic S, Barac M, Pesic M, Dodig D, Ignjatovic-Micic D (2011) Characterization of proteins from grain of different bread and durum wheat genotypes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12: 5878–5894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Réka Haraszi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix I

SDS-PAGE protocol used by the Wheat Chemistry and End–Use Quality Laboratory of CIMMYT

Reagents and main steps of the procedure were published in Peña et al. (2004, revised in 2018).

PREPARATION OF REAGENTS

Reagent 1. 1 M Tris pH 8.5

Dissolve 30.3 g of Tris in 220 ml of distilled water. Adjust pH to 8.5 with concentrated HCl. Bring the total volume up to 250 ml with distilled water. Store in the refrigerator.

Reagent 2. 1 M Tris pH 6.8

Dissolve 12.1 g of Tris in 64 ml of distilled water. Adjust pH to 6.8 with concentrated HCl. Bring the total volume up to 100 ml with distilled water. Store in the refrigerator.

Reagent 3. 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)

Dissolve 5 g of SDS in 40 ml distilled water and bring the total volume up to 50 ml with distilled water. Store at room temperature (20–25 °C).

Reagent 4. Stock acrylamide solution (40%T and 1.3%C) for running and stacking gels

Weigh 0.52 g of bis-acrylamide and 39.5 g of acrylamide. Dissolve in approximately 70 ml of distilled water and bring the total volume up to 100 ml. Homogenize and filter the solution before use. Store in a dark (translucent) container in the refrigerator.

CAUTION: use gloves and mask when working with acrylamide.

Reagent 5. Stock sample buffer for total protein extracts

Dissolve 12 g of glycerol in 36 ml of distilled water. Add 0.76 g of Tris, 4.0 g of SDS, 750 mg of dithiothreitol (1.5% DTT) and 6.0 mg of bromophenol blue. Adjust to pH 6.8 with concentrated HCl and bring the total volume up to 50 ml with distilled water.

Reagent 6. Tris-glycine stock for running buffer

Put 30.0 g of Tris in a 1-L beaker. Add 887 ml of distilled water and stir. While stirring the solution first add 144 g of glycine then 10 g of SDS. The pH of the solution should be 8.3. If the pH is higher, do not adjust it with HCl as it would alter the desired ionic strength.

Reagent 7. Staining and destaining solutions

Solution 1 is a 12% trichloroacetic acid solution. Dilute 120 g of trichloroacetic acid in distilled water and make up to 1 L.

Solution 2 is the staining solution. Mix 400 ml of methanol, 100 ml of glacial acetic acid, 0.1 g of Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, and 500 ml of distilled water (1 L in total).

Reagent 8. 1.5% ammonium persulfate

Dissolve 150 mg of ammonium persulfate in 10 ml of distilled water. Prepare fresh immediately before use.

1.1 Procedures

Extraction of total proteins

Weigh 20 mg of sample into a microcentrifuge tube. Add 300 μl of sample buffer (reagent 5) and incubate for 5 min in an Eppendorf Thermomixer comfort at 90 °C and 1400 rpm. Centrifuge for 5 min at 13000 rpm in an Eppendorf Microcentrifuge 5415C (Brinkmann Instruments Inc., NY).

Gels for total protein extracts from durum wheat and bread wheat

The final acrylamide concentration to be used in the gel will depend on the size and type of bands to be examined in detail. For the running gel, 9–10% acrylamide is the most common gel concentration when examining high molecular weight glutenins from whole grain protein extracts. However, for better separation of subunits 2 and 2*, gels of around 13% acrylamide are more appropriate.

Formulas to determine gel concentrations

$$ \mathrm{Concentration}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{acrylamide}\ \left(\mathrm{T}\right)=\frac{\mathrm{g}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{acrylamide}+\mathrm{g}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{bis}-\mathrm{acrylamide}}{\mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{volume}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{solution}}\times 100 $$
$$ \mathrm{Concentration}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{bis}-\mathrm{acrylamide}\ \left(\mathrm{C}\right)=\frac{\mathrm{g}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{bis}-\mathrm{acrylamide}\kern2.78em }{\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{g}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{Acrylamide}-\mathrm{g}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{bis}-\mathrm{acrylamide}\\ {}\end{array}}\times 100 $$

Staining and destaining gels

Submerge the gels for 5 min in a 12% trichloroacetic acid solution (reagent 1), then place them in staining solution (solution 2) for 4 h, and finally for destaining place them in distilled water for 24 h.

Reagents for glutenin and gliadin extracts

Solution 1.1. 0.08 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0

Weigh 4.8 g of Tris and 20 g of SDS and dissolve them in 500 ml of distilled water, adjusting the pH to 8.0 with HCl.

Solution 1.2. 50% propanol

Solution 1.3. Mix 500 ml of each of solution 1.1 and 1.2

Solution 1.4. For 10 ml of solution 1.3, mix in 200 mg of DTT. This reagent should be prepared the same day.

Solution 1.5. For 10 ml of solution 1.3, add 140 μl of 4-vinyl-pyridine and mix. This reagent should be prepared the same day.

Solution 1.6. Glutenin extraction buffer

2% SDS (w/v), 40% glycerol (w/v), 0.02% (w/v) bromophenol blue.

Dissolve 20 g of glycerol in 36 ml of distilled water. Add 0.76 g of Tris, 1.0 g of SDS, and 10.0 mg of Coomassie Brilliant Blue R. Adjust the pH to 6.8 with concentrated HCl. Make the volume up to 50 ml with distilled water.

Solution 1.7. Gliadin extraction buffer

2% SDS (w/v), 40% glycerol (w/v), 0.02% (w/v) bromophenol blue. Dissolve 20 g of glycerol in 36 ml of distilled water. Add 0.76 g of Tris, 1.0 g of SDS, and 10.0 mg of Coomassie Brilliant Blue R. Adjust the pH to 8.0 with concentrated HCl. Make the volume up to 50 ml with distilled water.

Running gel (For two 15%T gels, 17 cm high and 1 mm thick)

  • 24.7 ml of Tris pH 8.5 (Reagent 1)

  • 24.4 ml of Acrylamide Stock for Running Gel (Reagent 4)

  • 650 μl of 10% SDS.

  • 14.0 ml of Distilled Water

This mixture is deaerated with a Sonics Branson 5510 for 2–4 min. Immediately filter the mix through coarse filter paper. Add 1.3 ml of fresh 1.5% ammonium persulfate (reagent 8). Assemble frames for pouring gels then add 50 μl of TEMED to the mixture. Mix gently for 5 seconds and pour the gel solution into the frames. Immediately apply 1 ml of butyl alcohol to the top of the gel to prevent the formation of a meniscus. The alcohol should be applied slowly with a syringe.

Stacking gel (For two 4.8%T gels, 3.0 cm high and 1.0 mm thick)

Before adding the stacking gel solution, remove the butyl alcohol from the top of the running gel.

  • 6.12 ml of Distilled Water

  • 1.10 ml of Tris pH 6.8 (Reagent 2)

  • 1.05 ml of acrylamide stock for stacking gel (reagent 4).

  • 90 μl of 10% SDS.

  • 380 μl of 1.5% ammonium persulfate

Mix reagents together gently, add 50 μl of TEMED, and mix again. Apply to the top of the running gel, being careful that there are no bubbles in the lanes of the Teflon lane former (comb). This can be achieved by inserting the Teflon comb at an angle of approximately 30°. Let the gel stand for 30 min to 1 hr. Very carefully remove the Teflon comb and with a syringe remove the excess solution which did not polymerise. Fill the lanes with running buffer (see below).

Running buffer

Mix 400 ml of stock for running buffer (reagent 6) and 3.6 L of distilled water. Use approximately 2.5 L of buffer per tank (e.g. Protean BIO-RAD equipment, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, California) for 2 gels (4.5 L for a buffer tank for 6 gels).

Running the gel

Load the samples in each lane (4–8 μl of extracted protein). Assemble the equipment, connect the hoses of the cooling system (15 °C) to running water and turn on the power. The running time depends on the current (mA) and the porosity (%T) of the gel. Electrophoretic separation can be run at 12.5 mA per gel for about 19 h (overnight). When using more than 25 mA per gel (runs of approx. 8 h), it is necessary to use a cooling apparatus to maintain temperature at around 15 °C. For a shorter running time of 4–5 h, run the electrophoresis at 35–40 mA per gel at 15 °C until the colored line arrives at the bottom edge of the gel. In order to maintain ionic strength, it is recommended to use a small pump connecting the lower to the upper buffer containers to recirculate the running buffer.

Preserving gels

Fresh gels may be kept for limited time if placed in polyethylene plastic bags in the refrigerator. Drying the gels with a gel drier is more convenient to preserve the gels for longer.

Selective extraction of gliadins and glutenins for SDS-PAGE

According to Singh et al. (1991) with modifications.

figure a

Appendix II

A-PAGE protocol for gliadin analysis

The main steps are described in Metakovsky and Novoselskaya (2001) for gels of standard size (18 ⨯ 20 cm). For long acrylamide gels (18 ⨯ 32 cm) it is advisable to use the protocol previously described by Branlard et al. (1990).

Reagents

  1. 1.

    70% ethanol

  2. 2.

    1.5% aluminium lactate pH 3.1

    • Dissolve 15 g of aluminium lactate in 800 ml of distilled water∗. Adjust pH to 3.1 with lactic acid. Bring the total volume to 1 L with distilled water.

  3. 3.

    1% ascorbic acid

    • Dissolve 0.1 g of ascorbic acid in 10 ml of distilled water. Prepare fresh for each use.

  4. 4.

    1% Fe(SO4)3

    • Dissolve 0.1 g of Fe(SO4)3 in 10 ml of distilled water.

  5. 5.

    40% acrylamide

    • It is highly advisable to purchase 40% acrylamide solution ready to use. Alternatively, dissolve 40 g of high quality acrylamide in 100 ml of distilled water. Store at 4 °C.

  6. 6.

    2% bis-acrylamide.

    • It is highly advisable to purchase 2% bis-acrylamide solution ready to use.

    • Alternatively, dissolve 2 g of high quality bis-acrylamide in 100 ml of distilled water. Store at 4 °C.

  7. 7.

    0.33% hydrogen peroxide

    • Purchase 3% hydrogen peroxide (10 volumes) from a pharmacy or store and keep it at 4 °C. Make 1.1 ml of 3% hydrogen peroxide (10 volumes) up to 10 ml with distilled water. Prepare fresh for each use.

  8. 8.

    Stock sample buffer

    • Dissolve 3 ml of glycerol in 1 ml of 1.5% aluminum lactate pH 3.1. Add a small portion (a few grains of powder) of pyronin or methyl green. Bring the total volume up to 10 ml with distilled water.

  9. 9.

    Stock running buffer (0.15% aluminium lactate pH 3.1)

    • Dilute 100 ml of 1.5% aluminum lactate with 900 ml of distilled water.

∗Dr. Metakovsky consistently uses distilled water. The classic ultra-pure water influences the resolution of the gliadins and may alter the mobility of some gliadin alleles. Twice-deionized water (today referred to as ultra-pure water) was used by Branlard et al. (1990).

Procedures

Gel preparation

8.3% Acrylamide, 0.42% Bis-Acrylamide, 0.1% Ascorbic Acid, 0.00067% Fe(SO4)3, 0.15% Aluminum Lactate, pH 3.1

The glass plates (20 ⨯ 20 cm and 2 mm thickness for a normal gel or 30 ⨯ 20 cm and 2 mm thickness for a long gel for higher resolution) are cleaned with 70% ethanol then by spreading droplets of glycerol until a thin film forms and drying with KimWipes. This treatment makes it easier to remove gels from plates.

Mix 21 ml of 2% bis-acrylamide and 20.8 ml of 40% acrylamide. Add 67 μl of 1% Fe(SO4)3, 10 ml of 1% ascorbic acid, 10 ml of 1.5% aluminum lactate, and bring the total volume up to 100 ml, filter through filter paper and degas, then cool on ice before use. Add 0.4 ml of 0.33% hydrogen peroxide, mix well and pour rapidly into the glass plate assembly. The comb is inserted and the gel is polymerized for 10 min.

Gliadin extraction

Weigh about 20 mg of sample into a microcentrifuge tube. Add 150 μl of 70% ethanol and incubate for 30 min at room temperature. Centrifuge the sample for 5 min at 12500 rpm. Transfer the supernatant to a microcentrifuge tube and mix with an equal volume of the sample buffer. Freshly prepared (within two days) samples should be used to obtain well resolved electrophoretic profiles.

EXTRACTION OF GLIADINS FOR A-PAGE

Electrophoresis

After rinsing the wells with running buffer, the glass plates containing the gel are placed in the vertical slab gel apparatus. Then the wells are filled with the buffer and 20 to 30 μl of the samples are slowly loaded. Electrophoresis from the anode (the upper buffer) to the cathode (the lower buffer) is performed for 10–20 min at 220 V and then for 2.5–3 h at 550 V without buffer circulation. The lower tank of the vertical apparatus is cooled with tap water or in a cooling system at 10 °C.

Staining/destaining

The gels are kept on one of the glass plates to reduce the risk of damaging the gels. The staining procedure is the same as for the SDS-PAGE method.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haraszi, R., Ikeda, T.M., Peña, R.J., Branlard, G. (2020). Gluten Analysis. In: Igrejas, G., Ikeda, T., Guzmán, C. (eds) Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics