Abstract
Recent progress in fully-automated image segmentation has enabled efficient extraction of clinical parameters in large-scale clinical imaging studies, reducing laborious manual processing. However, the current state-of-the-art automatic image segmentation may still fail, especially when it comes to atypical cases. Visual inspection of segmentation quality is often required, thus diminishing the improvements in efficiency. This drives an increasing need to enhance the overall data processing pipeline with robust automatic quality scoring, especially for clinical applications. We present a novel quality control-driven (QCD) framework to provide reliable segmentation using a set of different neural networks. In contrast to the prior segmentation and quality scoring methods, the proposed framework automatically selects the optimal segmentation on-the-fly from the multiple candidate segmentations available, directly utilizing the inherent Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) predictions. We trained and evaluated the framework on a large-scale cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic cine image sequences from the UK Biobank Study. The framework achieved segmentation accuracy of mean DSC at 0.966, mean prediction error of DSC within 0.015, and mean error in estimating lumen area ≤17.6 mm2 for both ascending aorta and proximal descending aorta. This novel QCD framework successfully integrates the automatic image segmentation along with detection of critical errors on a per-case basis, paving the way towards reliable fully-automatic extraction of clinical parameters for large-scale imaging studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Redheuil, A., et al.: Proximal aortic distensibility is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and incident CV events: the MESA study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 64, 2619–2629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.060
Petersen, S.E., et al.: Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 50, 46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-46
Bernard, O., et al.: Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 2514–2525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502
Bai, W., et al.: Recurrent neural networks for aortic image sequence segmentation with sparse annotations. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11073, pp. 586–594. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_67
Biasiolli, L., et al.: Automated localization and quality control of the aorta in cine CMR can significantly accelerate processing of the UK Biobank population data. PLoS One 14, e0212272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212272
Kohlberger, T., Singh, V., Alvino, C., Bahlmann, C., Grady, L.: Evaluating segmentation error without ground truth. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7510, pp. 528–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_65
Robinson, R., Valindria, V.V., Bai, W., Suzuki, H., Matthews, P.M., Page, C., Rueckert, D., Glocker, B.: Automatic quality control of cardiac MRI segmentation in large-scale population imaging. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, S. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10433, pp. 720–727. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_82
Robinson, R., et al.: Automated quality control in image segmentation: application to the UK Biobank cardiac MR imaging study. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 21, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0523-x
Robinson, R., et al.: Subject-level prediction of segmentation failure using real-time convolutional neural nets. In: MIDL, pp. 3–5 (2018)
Roy, A.G., Conjeti, S., Navab, N., Wachinger, C.: Inherent brain segmentation quality control from fully ConvNet Monte Carlo sampling. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11070, pp. 664–672. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_75
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1, 321–331 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133570
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre at The Oxford University Hospitals, University of Oxford, UK. Authors acknowledge support from the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, and donation of GPU from NVIDIA Corp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hann, E. et al. (2019). Quality Control-Driven Image Segmentation Towards Reliable Automatic Image Analysis in Large-Scale Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Aortic Cine Imaging. In: Shen, D., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019. MICCAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_83
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_83
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32244-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32245-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)