Skip to main content

Scale and Shape Effects on the Fatigue Behaviour of Additively Manufactured SS316L Structures: A Preliminary Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering (ADM 2019)

Abstract

The freedom in geometry given by additive manufacturing allows to produce cellular materials, also called lattice structures, with unit cells and mesoscale features that are impossible to obtain with traditional manufacturing techniques. The geometric modeling of lattice structures still presents issues such as robustness and automation, but, with a novel modeling approach based on subdivision surface algorithm, these troubles were limited. Furthermore, the subdivision method smooths surfaces, avoiding sharp edges at nodal points and increasing performances in fatigue properties. The aim of this work is twofold; a. The subdivision surface method is validated through fatigue tests on specimen additively manufactured by selective laser melting technology in SS316L stainless steel; dynamic tests were carried out on two types of lattice structures based on cubic cell: one obtained with a traditional modeling method, one obtained with a subdivision surface approach. b. Additional tests on bulk cylindrical samples, allowed to propose a preliminary model that describes the fatigue behaviour of additively manufactured lattices as a function of the bulk material properties, considering the shape and scale effects coming from stress concentration factor, increased area, surface roughness and porosity of the part. Results show that the subdivision surface approach improves the fatigue life of lattice structures, as expected. More, the lattices have a worse fatigue life compared to the bulk samples due to the scale and shape effects, that results in a higher sensibility to surface and internal defects related to the manufacturing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holmström, J., Partanen, J., Tuomi, J., Walter, M.: Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 21, 687–697 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381011063996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wohlers, T., Campbell, I., Diegel, O., Kowen, J., Caffrey, T.: Wohlers report 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F.: Cellular Solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878326

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Savio, G., Rosso, S., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G.: Geometric modeling of cellular materials for additive manufacturing in biomedical field: a review. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2018, 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1654782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Hooreweder, B., Kruth, J.-P.: Advanced fatigue analysis of metal lattice structures produced by selective laser melting. CIRP Ann. 66, 221–224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRP.2017.04.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SASAM: Additive Manufacturing: SASAM Standardisation Roadmap (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. AMSC: Standardization Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing (version 1.0) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yadollahi, A., Shamsaei, N.: Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Fatigue 98, 14–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greitemeier, D., Dalle Donne, C., Syassen, F., Eufinger, J., Melz, T.: Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 629–634 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masuo, H., Tanaka, Y., Morokoshi, S., Yagura, H., Uchida, T., Yamamoto, Y., Murakami, Y.: Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing. Int. J. Fatigue 117, 163–179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2018.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., Fini, S., Olmi, G., Vranic, A., Ciric-Kostic, S.: Influence of the build orientation on the fatigue strength of EOS maraging steel produced by additive metal machine. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 39, 637–647 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bača, A., Konečná, R., Kunz, L.: Influence of build direction on the fatigue behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by direct metal laser sintering. Mater. Today Proc. 3, 921–924 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2016.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wycisk, E., Solbach, A., Siddique, S., Herzog, D., Walther, F., Emmelmann, C.: Effects of defects in laser additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on fatigue properties. Phys. Procedia 56, 371–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHPRO.2014.08.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Savio, G., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G.: Geometric modeling of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp. J. 24, 351–360 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2016-0122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM: ASTM E606/E606M - 2012 – Standard Test Method for Strain-Controlled Fatigue Testing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Catmull, E., Clark, J.: Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes. Comput. Des. 10, 350–355 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(78)90110-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elangeswaran, C., Cutolo, A., Muralidharan, G.K., de Formanoir, C., Berto, F., Vanmeensel, K., Van Hooreweder, B.: Effect of post-treatments on the fatigue behaviour of 316L stainless steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Int. J. Fatigue 123, 31–39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2019.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ISO International Organization for Standardization: ISO 4287:1997 - Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Profile method – Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO International Organization for Standardization: ISO 4288:1996 - Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Profile method – Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savio, G., Rosso, S., Curtarello, A., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G.: Implications of modeling approaches on the fatigue behavior of cellular solids. Addit. Manuf. 25, 50–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Renishaw: Data sheets - Additive manufacturing - SS 316L-0407. https://www.renishaw.com/en/data-sheets-additive-manufacturing–17862

  22. ISO International Organization for Standardization: ISO/DIS 12107 – Metallic materials – Fatigue testing – Statistical planning and analysis of data (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Hooreweder, B., Apers, Y., Lietaert, K., Kruth, J.P.: Improving the fatigue performance of porous metallic biomaterials produced by selective laser melting. Acta Biomater. 47, 193–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yadroitsev, I., Yadroitsava, I., Bertrand, P., Smurov, I.: Factor analysis of selective laser melting process parameters and geometrical characteristics of synthesized single tracks. Rapid Prototyp. J. 18, 201–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211218117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zorin, D.: Subdivision zoo. Subdiv. Model. Animat. 65–104 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murakami, Y.: Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions. Elsevier, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Savio, G., Curtarello, A., Rosso, S., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G.: Homogenization driven design of lightweight structures for additive manufacturing. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00543-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo (CARIPARO) and by Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia “FESR D23D18000160007” to Tesolin S.p.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Rosso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rosso, S., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G., Savio, G. (2020). Scale and Shape Effects on the Fatigue Behaviour of Additively Manufactured SS316L Structures: A Preliminary Study. In: Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., Vergnano, A. (eds) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering. ADM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_75

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31154-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics