Abstract
Design for Assembly is a strategy of design aimed at minimising product cost through design and process improvements. It led to a revolution in the manufacturing industry, resulting in reduced product costs, improved quality, shorter time to market, lower inventory, fewer suppliers and many other improvements. DFA is the method of design of the product for ease of assembly and in this context this paper presents an application of the strategy to a virtual case study represented by a two-way relief valve modelled by CAD. The aim of this paper was to test some DFA methods proposed by the literature and search for an efficient assembly of the virtual two-way relief valve reproduced by CAD, then verifying its assembly effectiveness. Some evaluation methods proposed by literature about the optimisation of design efficiency have been applied to the case study and this led to reconsider the design of some parts of the product. A final new design for the valve is proposed and the evaluation methods applied have been tested again on the new solution, in order to validate the results. A comparison between the original valve and the new version proposed by the authors has been made, in order both to check the feasibility of the new valve and in order to check the evaluation methods proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Warnecke, H.J., Bassler, R.: Design for assembly - part of the design process. Annals of CIRP 37(1), 1 (1988)
Kroll, E., LenZ, E., Wolberg, J.R.: A knowledge-based solution to the design for assembly problem. Manuf. Rev. 1(2), 104–108 (1988)
Rosario, L.M., Knight, W.A.: Design for assembly analysis: extraction of features from a CAD system database. Ann. CIRP 38(1), 13 (1989)
Miyakawa, S., Ohashi, T.: The Hitachi Assemblability Evaluation Method (AEM). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Design for Assembly, Newport, RI, 15–17 April 1986
Miyakawa, S., Ohashi, T., Iwata, M.: The Hitachi New Assemblability Evaluation Method (AEM). Trans. North Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. SME (1990)
Boothroyd, G.: Product design for assembly. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1980)
Yoosufani, Z., Boothroyd, G.: Design of parts for ease of handling. Report No. 2, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, September 1978
Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P.: “Product Design for Assembly,” Designers Handbook, Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc., 138 Main Street, Wakefield, RI 02879 (1979)
Leaney, P., Wittenberg, G.: Design for assembling: the evaluation methods of Hitachi, Boothroyd and Lucas. Assembly Autom. (1992). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb004359
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Francia, D., Seminerio, D., Caligiana, G., Frizziero, L., Liverani, A., Donnici, G. (2020). Virtual Design for Assembly Improving the Product Design of a Two-Way Relief Valve. In: Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., Vergnano, A. (eds) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering. ADM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31153-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31154-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)