Skip to main content

A Path Towards Understanding Factors Affecting Crash Severity in Autonomous Vehicles Using Current Naturalistic Driving Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1038))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the U.S., in 2015 alone, there were approximately 35,000 fatalities and 2.4 million injuries caused by an estimated 6.3 million traffic accidents. In the future, it is speculated that automated systems will help to avoid or decrease the number and severity of accidents. However, before such a time, a broad range of vehicles, from non-autonomous to fully-autonomous, will share the road. Hence, measures need to be put in place to improve both safety and efficiency, while not compromising the advantages of autonomous driving technology. In this study, a Bayesian network model is developed to predict the severity of an accident, should it occur, given the road and the immediate environment conditions. The model is calibrated for the case of traditional vehicles using pre-crash information on driver behaviour, road surface conditions, weather and lighting conditions, among other variables, to predict two categories of consequences for accidents, namely property damage and injury/fatality. The results demonstrate that the proposed methodology and the determinant factors used in the models can predict the consequences of an accident, and more importantly, the probability of a crash causing injury/fatality, with high accuracy. Approaches to extend this model are proposed to predict accident severity for autonomous vehicles through leveraging their sensor data. Such a model would assist the development of countermeasures to identify the most important factors impacting severity of accidents for semi- and fully-autonomous vehicles to prevent accidents, decrease accident severity in cases where accidents are bound to occur, and improve transportation safety in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization: Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 2015, Motor vehicle crashes: overview. Traffic Saf. Facts Res. Note 2016, 1–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Safety Council: Injury Facts: Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 99-74142, 2015 edn, Itasca, IL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mannering, F.L., Grodsky, L.L.: Statistical analysis of motorcyclists’ perceived accident risk. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27(1), 21–31 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard, M.E., Desai, A.V., Grunstein, R.R., Hukins, C., Armstrong, J.G., Joffe, D., Swann, P., Campbell, D.A., Pierce, R.J.: Sleepiness, sleep-disordered breathing, and accident risk factors in commercial vehicle drivers. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 170(9), 1014–1021 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shankar, V., Mannering, F., Barfield, W.: Effect of roadway geometrics and environmental factors on rural freeway accident frequencies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27(3), 371–389 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lord, D., Mannering, F.: The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 44(5), 291–305 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, L.Y., Chen, W.C.: Data mining of tree-based models to analyze freeway accident frequency. J. Saf. Res. 36(4), 365–375 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayakawa, H., Fischbeck, P.S., Fischhoff, B.: Traffic accident statistics and risk perceptions in Japan and the United States. Accid. Anal. Prev. 32(6), 827–835 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Valent, F., Schiava, F., Savonitto, C., Gallo, T., Brusaferro, S., Barbone, F.: Risk factors for fatal road traffic accidents in Udine, Italy. Accid. Anal. Prev. 34(1), 71–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zajac, S.S., Ivan, J.N.: Factors influencing injury severity of motor vehicle–crossing pedestrian crashes in rural Connecticut. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35(3), 369–379 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keall, M.D., Frith, W.J., Patterson, T.L.: The influence of alcohol, age and number of passengers on the night-time risk of driver fatal injury in New Zealand. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36(1), 49–61 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Derrig, R.A., Segui-Gomez, M., Abtahi, A., Liu, L.L.: The effect of population safety belt usage rates on motor vehicle-related fatalities. Accid. Anal. Prev. 34(1), 101–110 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yannis, G., Golias, J., Papadimitriou, E.: Driver age and vehicle engine size effects on fault and severity in young motorcyclist accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 37(2), 327–333 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, J.B.: The relationship between road accident severity and recorded weather. J. Saf. Res. 29(4), 249–262 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neyens, D.M., Boyle, L.N.: The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40(1), 254–259 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, C., Zhang, G., Tarefder, R., Ma, J., Wei, H., Guan, H.: A multinomial logit model-Bayesian network hybrid approach for driver injury severity analyses in rear-end crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 80, 76–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yau, K.K.: Risk factors affecting the severity of single vehicle traffic accidents in Hong Kong. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36(3), 333–340 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milton, J.C., Shankar, V.N., Mannering, F.L.: Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40(1), 260–266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Delen, D., Sharda, R., Bessonov, M.: Identifying significant predictors of injury severity in traffic accidents using a series of artificial neural networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(3), 434–444 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ouyang, Y., Shankar, V., Yamamoto, T.: Modeling the simultaneity in injury causation in multivehicle collisions. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1784, 143–152 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malyshkina, N.V., Mannering, F.L.: Markov switching multinomial logit model: an application to accident-injury severities. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41(4), 829–838 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Train, K.E.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Liang, F.: Crash injury severity analysis using Bayesian ordered probit models. J. Transp. Eng. 135(1), 18–25 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mujalli, R.O., de Oña, J.: Injury severity models for motor vehicle accidents: a review. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daniels, S., Brijs, T., Nuyts, E., Wets, G.: Externality of risk and crash severity at roundabouts. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(6), 1966–1973 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, X., Kockelman, K.: Use of heteroscedastic ordered logit model to study severity of occupant injury: distinguishing effects of vehicle weight and type. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1908, 195–204 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jin, Y., Wang, X., Chen, X.: Right-angle crash injury severity analysis using ordered probability models. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), vol. 3, pp. 206–209. IEEE, May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, X., Srinivasan, S.: A comprehensive analysis of factors influencing the injury severity of large-truck crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43(1), 49–57 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kunt, M.M., Aghayan, I., Noii, N.: Prediction for traffic accident severity: comparing the artificial neural network, genetic algorithm, combined genetic algorithm and pattern search methods. Transport 26(4), 353–366 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sameen, M.I., Pradhan, B.: Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks. Appl. Sci. 7(6), 476 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simoncic, M.: A Bayesian network model of two-car accidents. J. Transp. Stat. 7(2/3), 13–25 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. de Ona, J., López, G., Mujalli, R., Calvo, F.J.: Analysis of traffic accidents on rural highways using Latent Class Clustering and Bayesian Networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 51, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Oña, J., Mujalli, R.O., Calvo, F.J.: Analysis of traffic accident injury severity on Spanish rural highways using Bayesian networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43(1), 402–411 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mujalli, R.O., De ONa, J.: A method for simplifying the analysis of traffic accidents injury severity on two-lane highways using Bayesian networks. J. Saf. Res. 42(5), 317–326 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zong, F., Xu, H., Zhang, H.: Prediction for traffic accident severity: comparing the Bayesian network and regression models. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gregoriades, A., Mouskos, K.C.: Black spots identification through a Bayesian networks quantification of accident risk index. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 28, 28–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mbakwe, A.C., Saka, A.A., Choi, K., Lee, Y.-J.: Modeling highway traffic safety in Nigeria using Delphi technique and Bayesian network. In: TRB 93rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Washington, D.C., p. 21 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. University of Michigan: Michigan Traffic Crash Facts (2017). https://www.michigantrafficcrashfacts.org. Accessed 29 July 2017

  40. Mittal, A. (ed.): Bayesian Network Technologies: Applications and Graphical Models: Applications and Graphical Models. IGI Global (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jensen, F.V.: An Introduction to Bayesian Networks, vol. 210, pp. 1–178. UCL Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Margaritis, D.: Learning Bayesian network model structure from data (No. CMU-CS-03-153). Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA School of Computer Science (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Powers, D.M.W.: Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2(1), 37–63 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Tape, T.G.: Interpretation of diagnostic tests. Ann. Intern. Med. 135(1), 72 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 77, 167–181 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Silberg, G., Wallace, R., Matuszak, G., Plessers, J., Brower, C., Subramanian, D.: Self-driving cars: the next revolution. White paper, KPMG LLP & Center of Automotive Research, p. 36 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yeomans, G.: Autonomous vehicles: handing over control—opportunities and risks for insurance. Lloyd’s (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kummerle, R., Hahnel, D., Dolgov, D., Thrun, S., Burgard, W.: Autonomous driving in a multi-level parking structure. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2009, pp. 3395–3400. IEEE, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schipperijn, J., Kerr, J., Duncan, S., Madsen, T., Klinker, C.D., Troelsen, J.: Dynamic accuracy of GPS receivers for use in health research: a novel method to assess GPS accuracy in real-world settings. Front. Public Health 2, 21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Durden, T.: Tesla autopilot crash caught on dashcam (2017). http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-02/tesla-autopilot-crash-caught-dashcam. Accessed 17 June 2017

  52. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Cybersecurity best practices for modern vehicles. Report No. DOT HS, 812, p. 333 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Petit, J., Shladover, S.E.: Potential cyberattacks on automated vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(2), 546–556 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anahita Khojandi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Wyk, F., Khojandi, A., Masoud, N. (2020). A Path Towards Understanding Factors Affecting Crash Severity in Autonomous Vehicles Using Current Naturalistic Driving Data. In: Bi, Y., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29513-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics