Abstract
The National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS) was implemented in 2010; it aims to prevent and reduce waste generation, eliminate the so-called ‘landfills’ and implement municipal solid waste management plans. Waste selective collection and recycling can reduce the amount of waste destined to landfills, reduce transportation frequencies and minimize overall disposal costs. However, the conventional approach currently adopted in Brazil is inefficient considering economic, social and environmental aspects. There is an urgent need to improve municipal solid waste management (MSWM) by proposing alternatives, which cover product-service systems (PSS) and IoT based smart trash dustbins. This study provides an assessment through multicriteria analysis whether the implementation of scenarios using IoT smart trash cans is to be considered a sustainable operational strategy for the municipal public administration. The criteria used in the study was extracted from a systemic literature review; AHP and TOPSIS Fuzzy Methods were applied to achieve the best solution according to the selected criteria, which is the research main objective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Khatib IA, Arafat HA, Basheer T, Shawahneh H, Salahat A, Eid J, Ali W (2007) Trends and problems of solid waste management in developing countries: a case study in seven Palestinian districts. Waste Manage 27(12):1910–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2006.11.006
Arıkan E, Şimşit-Kalender ZT, Vayvay Ö (2017) Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey. J Clean Prod 142:403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.054
Banar M, Özkan A, Kulaç A (2010) Choosing a recycling system using ANP and ELECTRE III techniques. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 34(3):145–154. https://doi.org/10.3906/muh-0906-47
Brazil. Law nº. 12,305, of August 2 (2010) Institutes the national policy on solid waste. Available in http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm
Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
Coban A, Ertis IF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130
Da Silva CL (2018) Proposal of a dynamic model to evaluate public policies for the circular economy: scenarios applied to the municipality of Curitiba. Waste Manage 78:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.007
Dahlen L, Lagerkvist A, Dahlén L, Lagerkvist A (2010) Pay as you throw Strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden. Waste Manage 30(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.022
Deus RM, Battistelle RAG, Silva GHR (2016) Scenario evaluation for the management of household solid waste in small Brazilian municipalities. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19(1):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1205-0
Díaz-Díaz R, Muñoz L, Pérez-González D (2017) Business model analysis of public services operating in the smart city ecosystem: the case of SmartSantander. Future Gener Comput Syst Int J Esci 76:198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.01.032
Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F (2015) Designing Pay-As-You-Throw schemes in municipal waste management services: a holistic approach. Waste Manage 44:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.040
Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F (2018) Improving logistic efficiency of WEEE collection through dynamic scheduling using simulation modeling. Waste Manage 72:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.016
Ensslin L, Ensslin SR, Lacerda RTO, Tasca JE (2010) Bibliometric analysis process. Technical file with patent pending registration with INPI, Brazil
Gelbmann U, Hammerl B (2015) Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product-service-systems. J Clean Prod 97:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.104
Gupta H, Barua MK (2018) A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ 633:122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.173
Herva M, Roca E (2013) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Ind 25:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.005
Hlatka M, Stopka O, Chovancova M (2018) The solution of the sorted waste collection using the methods of multi-criteria decision-making 164–170
Huang Y-T, Pan T-C, Kao J-J (2011) Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. J Environ Manage 92(4):1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.002
Jovanovic S, Savic S, Jovicic N, Boskovic G, Djordjevic Z (2016) Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manage Res 34(9):884–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16654753
Khalili NR, Duecker S (2013) Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework. J Clean Prod 47:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.044
Lolli F, Ishizaka A, Gamberini R, Rimini B, Ferrari AM, Marinelli S, Savazza R (2016) Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(5, SI):1317–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6
Makan A, Malamis D, Assobhei O, Loizidou M, Mountadar M (2013) Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for the treatment of municipal solid waste in Morocco. Int J Environ Waste Manage 12(3):300–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2013.056197
Manni LA, Runhaar HAC (2014) The social efficiency of pay-as-you-throw schemes for municipal solid waste reduction: a cost-benefit analysis of four financial incentive schemes applied in Switzerland. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433321450001X
Mesquita JM (2014) Method of evaluation of the sustainability level of rural electrification programs with individual photovoltaic systems. Dissertation industrial and systems engineering, Federal University of Technology, Parana, Pato Branco, Brazil. Available in: http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/bitstream/1/869/1/PB_PPGEE_M_Mesquita%2C%20Jos%C3%A9%20Manuel_2014.pdf
Milutinović B, Stefanović G, Dassisti M, Marković D, Vučković G (2014) Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model. Energy 74(C):190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.056
Milutinovic B, Stefanovic G, Kyoseva V, Yordanova D, Dombalov I (2016) Sustainability assessment and comparison of waste management systems: the Cities of Sofia and Niš case studies. Waste Manage Res 34(9):896–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16654755
Mir MA, Ghazvinei PT, Sulaiman NMN, Basri NEA, Saheri S, Mahmood NZ, Jahan A, Begum RA, Aghamohammadi N (2016) Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. J Environ Manage 166:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028
Misra D, Das G, Chakrabortty T, Das D (2018) An IoT-based waste management system monitored by cloud. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20(3):1574–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0720-y
Nǎdǎban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I (2016) Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Procedia Comput Sci 91(Itqm):823–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
Pires A, Chang N-B, Martinho G (2011) An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour Conserv Recycl 56(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.08.004
Rada EC, Ragazzi M, Fedrizzi P (2013) Web-GIS oriented systems viability for municipal solid waste selective collection optimization in developed and transient economies. Waste Manage 33(4):785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.002
Rebehy PCPW, Costa AL, Campello CA, de Freitas Espinoza D, Neto MJ (2017) Innovative social business of selective waste collection in Brazil: cleaner production and poverty reduction. J Clean Prod 154:462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.173
Rigamonti L, Sterpi I, Grosso M (2016) Integrated municipal waste management systems: an indicator to assess their environmental and economic sustainability. Ecol Ind 60:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.022
Rodrigues AP, Fernandes ML, Rodrigues MFF, Bortoluzzi SC, da Costa SE, de Lima E (2018) Developing criteria for performance assessment in municipal solid waste management. J Clean Prod 186:748–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.067
Saaty TL (2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. Rev Real Acad Ciencias 102(2):251–318. Retrieved from http://www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00576.PDF
Sarra A, Mazzocchitti M, Rapposelli A (2017) Evaluating joint environmental and cost performance in municipal waste management systems through data envelopment analysis: scale effects and policy implications. Ecol Ind 73:756–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.035
Simões P, Carvalho P, Marques RC (2012) Performance assessment of refuse collection services using robust efficiency measures. Resour Conserv Recycl 67:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.07.006
Stefanović G, Milutinović B, Vučićević B, Denčić-Mihajlov K, Turanjanin V (2016) A comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analysis and Synthesis of Parameters under Information Deficiency method for assessing the sustainability of waste management scenarios. J Clean Prod 130:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.050
Topaloglu M, Yarkin F, Kaya T (2018) Solid waste collection system selection for smart cities based on a type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria decision technique. Soft Comput 22(15):4879–4890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3232-8
Tseng ML, Bui TD (2017) Identifying eco-innovation in industrial symbiosis under linguistic preferences: a novel hierarchical approach. J Clean Prod 140:1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.014
Vucijak B, Silajd I (2015) Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.030
Wen Z, Hu S, De Clercq D, Beck MB, Zhang H, Zhang H, Fei F, Liu J (2017) Design, implementation, and evaluation of an Internet of Things (IoT) network system for restaurant food waste management. Waste Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.054
Yerraboina S, Kumar NM, Parimala KS, Aruna Jyothi N (2018) Monitoring the smart garbage bin filling status: an IoT application towards waste management. Int J Civ Eng Technol 9(6):373–381. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049254292&partnerID=40&md5=ad40ccee9eda35018c4e3566a6ea3473
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
da Roza, D.A., Aguiar, G.T., Pinheiro de Lima, E., Gouvea da Costa, S.E., Adamczuk, G.O. (2020). Decision Model for Selecting Advanced Technologies for Municipal Solid Waste Management. In: Leal Filho, W., Borges de Brito, P., Frankenberger, F. (eds) International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26758-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26759-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)