Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is “Chronic Pain” a Meaningful Diagnosis?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Meanings of Pain

Abstract

Introduction

“Chronic pain” and “chronic primary pain” in particular are both about to appear in the international taxonomy, ICD-11. While this is likely to have great utility at administrative and possibly clinical levels, the question arises as to whether people experiencing chronic pain also will benefit.

Methods

The definitions (denotations) of “chronic pain” as symptom, disease and diagnosis are refracted through the constraints of language, especially figures of speech, in order to ascertain if “meaning” is possible.

Results

“Chronic (primary) pain” as a taxonomic entity remains tied to the definitional link of “pain” itself to actual or apprehended tissue damage. This situation does not assist the plight of those experiencers of pain in whom tissue damage cannot be demonstrated.

Conclusion

While the definition of pain itself is constrained by the link to tissue damage, there can be no satisfactory denotation of “chronic pain” for those who live with that experience. As such, meaning remains elusive.

Clinical Implications

“Chronic pain” and “chronic primary pain” in particular are about to appear in the international taxonomy, ICD-11. While this is a welcome development towards the recognition of chronic pain as a societal and clinical problem, with positive diagnostic, therapeutic and administrative implications, the question also arises, whether this “entity” carries meaning for those who experience it. This article argues that, while pain itself is defined as being linked to tissue damage, there can be no satisfactory denotation of “chronic pain” for those who live with that experience. As such, meaning remains elusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156(6):1003–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JWS, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Benoliel R, et al. The IASP taskforce for the classification of chronic pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary. Pain. 2019;160(1):28–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mill JS. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. In: Robson JM, editor. The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 2. London: University of Toronto Press; 1843. p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen M, Quintner J, van Rysewyk S. Reconsidering the IASP definition of pain. Pain Rep. 2018;3(2):e634.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Derbyshire SWG. The IASP definition captures the essence of the pain experience. Pain Forum. 1999;8(2):106–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams ACC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain. 2016;157:2420–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definition of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. 222 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonica JJ. The management of pain. Philadelphia: Lea and Febirger; 1953. 592 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tallis R. Hippocratic oaths: medicine and its discontents. London: Atlantic Books; 2004. p. 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Young ME, Brookes L, Norman GR. Found in translation: the impact of familiar symptom descriptions on diagnosis in novices. Med Educ. 2007;14:1146–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters A, McEwan BS, Friston K. Uncertainty and stress: why it causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;156:164–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baumeister RE, Landau MJ. Finding the meaning of meaning: emerging insights from four grand questions. Rev Gen Psychol. 2018;22(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogden CK, Richards IA, editors. The meaning of meaning. 8th ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.; 1946. 363 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe GEM, Hacker PMS, Schulte J, translators. Oxford: Blackwell; 2009. 246 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruthrof H. Language, Vorstellung, and meaning as use. Linguist Philos Invest. 2011;10:60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luis-Flores H. The imagination’s piano in Wittgenstein’s Philosophische Untersuchungen. In: Wittgenstein and the future of philosophy. A reassessment after 30 years. Papers of the 24th international Wittgenstein-symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society; 2001. p. 218–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jackendoff R. A user’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. 274 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruthrof H. The body in language, vol. 7. London: Cassell; 2000. 193 p.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruthrof R. Semantics and the body: meaning from Frege to the postmodern. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1997. 321 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruthrof H. Language and imaginability. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing; 2014. 270 p.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. NEJM. 2006;355:2217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Temkin O. The Double Face of Janus. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977. p. 419–40. 

    Google Scholar 

  23. King LS. Medical thinking: a historical preface. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1982. p. 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nessa J. About signs and symptoms: can semiotics expand the view of clinical medicine? Theor Med Bioethics. 1996;17:363–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eriksen TE, Risør MB. What is called symptom? Med Health Care Phil. 2014;17(1):89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Semino E. Descriptions of pain, metaphor and embodied simulation. Metaphor Symbol. 2010;25(4):205–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stein E. On the problem of empathy. Stein W, transl. Washington: ICS Publications; 1989. 135 p.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Periyakoil VS. Using metaphors in medicine. J Palliat Care. 2008;11(6):842–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Masukume G, Zumla A. Analogies and metaphors in clinical medicine. Clin Med. 2012;12:55–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller FG, Colloca L. Semiotics and the placebo effect. Perspect Biol Med. 2010;53:509–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonica JJ. Introduction to the first world congress on pain. In: Bonica JJ, Albe-Fessard DG, editors. Advances in pain research and therapy, vol. 1. New York: Raven Press; 1976. p. xxvii–xix.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quintner JL, Buchanan D, Cohen ML, Katz J, Williamson O. Pain medicine and its models: helping or hindering. Pain Med. 2008;9:824–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dorland W. Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary. 31st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2007. 535 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenberg CE. The tyranny of diagnosis: specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Q. 2002;80:237–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Body R, Foex B. On the philosophy of diagnosis: is doing more good than harm better than “primum non nocere”? Emerg Med J. 2009;26:238–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen ML, Quintner JL, Buchanan DA. Is chronic pain a disease? Pain Med. 2013;14:1284–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Quintner J, Bove G, Cohen M. A critical evaluation of the “trigger point” phenomenon. Rheumatology. 2015;54:392–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ. Persistent pain as a disease entity: implications for clinical management. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:510–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kleisiaris CF, Sfakianakis C, Papathanasious IV. Health care practices in ancient Greece: the hippocratic ideal. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2014;7:6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Crookshank FG. The importance of a theory of signs and a critique of language in the study of Medicine. In: Ogden CK, Richards IA, editors. The meaning of meaning. 8th ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World; 1946. p. 337–55.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bichat X. Anatomie générale appliquée à la physiologie et à medicine, vol. 3. Paris: Broson, Gabon et Cie; 1825.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hanne M. Diagnosis and metaphor. Perspect Biol Med. 2015;58:35–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jutel A. Sociology of diagnosis: a preliminary review. Sociol Health Ill. 2009;31:278–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carr DB, Bradshaw YS. Time to flip the pain curriculum? Anesthesiol. 2014;120:12–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sullivan M. The problem of pain in the clinicopathological method. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(3):197–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St Vincent’s Clinic & UNSW, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia

    Milton Cohen

  2. Arthritis and Osteoporosis WA, Shenton Park, WA, Australia

    John Quintner

Authors
  1. Milton Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Quintner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milton Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Humanities, Department of Philosophy and Gender Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia

    Simon van Rysewyk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen, M., Quintner, J. (2019). Is “Chronic Pain” a Meaningful Diagnosis?. In: van Rysewyk, S. (eds) Meanings of Pain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24154-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation