Skip to main content

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms that construct complex prediction models are increasingly used for decision-making due to their high accuracy, e.g., to decide whether a bank customer should receive a loan or not. Due to the complexity, the models are perceived as black boxes. One approach is to augment the models with post-hoc explainability. In this work, we evaluate three different explanation approaches based on the users’ initial trust, the users’ trust in the provided explanation, and the established trust in the black box by a within-subject design study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexandrov, N.: Explainable AI decisions for human-autonomy interactions. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, p. 3991 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G.: Automated decision making comes of age. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(4), 83 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dheeru, D., Karra Taniskidou, E.: UCI Machine Learning Repository (2017). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  4. Doshi-Velez, F., Kim, B.: Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608 (2017)

  5. Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., Pitkin, E.: Peeking inside the black box: visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 24(1), 44–65 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakkaraju, H., Kamar, E., Caruana, R., Leskovec, J.: Interpretable & explorable approximations of black box models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01154 (2017)

  7. Lipton, Z.C.: The mythos of model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03490 (2016)

  8. Mohseni, S., Ragan, E.D.: A human-grounded evaluation benchmark for local explanations of machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05075 (2018)

  9. Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D.G., Hofman, J.M., Vaughan, J.W., Wallach, H.: Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07810 (2018)

  10. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: Why should I trust you?: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saabas, A.: Treeinterpreter (2015). https://github.com/andosa/treeinterpreter

  12. SoSciSurvey: SoSci survey tool (2018). https://www.soscisurvey.de/

  13. Tolomei, G., Silvestri, F., Haines, A., Lalmas, M.: Interpretable predictions of tree-based ensembles via actionable feature tweaking. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 465–474. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turner, R.: A model explanation system. In: 2016 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), pp. 1–6. Vietri sul Mare (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tzeng, F.Y., Ma, K.L.: Opening the black box-data driven visualization of neural networks. In: IEEE Visualization, VIS 2005, pp. 383–390. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, T., Rudin, C., Doshi-Velez, F., Liu, Y., Klampfl, E., MacNeille, P.: OR’s of AND’s for interpretable classification, with application to context-aware recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.07614 (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia El Bekri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

El Bekri, N., Kling, J., Huber, M.F. (2020). A Study on Trust in Black Box Models and Post-hoc Explanations. In: Martínez Álvarez, F., Troncoso Lora, A., Sáez Muñoz, J., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 14th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications (SOCO 2019). SOCO 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 950. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20055-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics