Skip to main content

Activities with Educational Robotics: Research Model and Tools for Evaluation of Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Learning with Educational Robotics

Abstract

The use of robots in the learning process has been popular since S. Papert developed his LOGO Turtle idea and argued that students can construct their own knowledge, test their constructive solutions and be motivated to learn if they use robotics in the learning process. Today, the idea of using elements of robotics in the learning process is no longer new and innovative but there are still elements that can be developed and issues that should be discussed. In this chapter, the authors provide the research model and five research tools (structured observation protocol, evaluation of the possible risks of early school leaving to be filled in by teachers before and after activities, students’ questionnaires to be filled in before and after activities) for evaluating the outcomes of organized after-school robotics activities. The research model and tools were tested and approbated with students who are at risk of early school leaving and students who participate in robotics activities to develop computational thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alimisis, D. (2014). Educational robotics in teacher education: An innovative tool for promoting quality education. In L. Daniela, I. Lūka, L. Rutka, I. Žogla (Eds.), Teacher of the 21st century: Quality education for quality teaching (pp. 28–39). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-5612-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariza, D. V., Palacio, A. M., Aragón, I. P., Pulido, C. M., Logreira, E. A., & McKinley, J. R. (2017). Application of color sensor programming with LEGO-Mindstorms NXT 2.0 to recreate a simplistic plague detection scenario. Scientia et Technica, 22(3), 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargagna, S., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dario, P., Dell’Omo, M., et al. (2018). Educational robotics in Down Syndrome: A feasibility study. Technology, knowledge and learning, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Bricker, L., Tzou, C., Lee, T., & Van Horne, K. (2012). Exploring the science framework: Engaging learners in science practices related to obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. Science Scope, 36(3), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, D., Ferari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/

  • Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Salvini, P., & Dario, P. (2018). Can educational robotics introduce young children to robotics and how can we measure it? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning., 34, 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catlin, D., & Blamires, M. (2018) Designing robots for special needs education. Technology, knowledge and learning, 1–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9378-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cejka, E., Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2006). Kindergarten robotics: Using robotics to motivate math, science, and engineering literacy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(4), 711–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danahy, E., Wang, E., Brockman, J., Carberry, A., Shapiro, B., & Rogers, C. B. (2014). LEGO-based robotics in higher education: 15 years of student creativity. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. https://doi.org/10.5772/58249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniela, L. (2016) Preliminary results of the project ‘Robotics-based learning interventions for preventing school failure and early school leaving. ICERI 9th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation Proceedings (pp. 4336–4344). ISBN: 978-084-0617-05895-01. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.

  • Daniela, L., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Educational robotics for inclusive education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9397-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniela, L., & Strods, R. (2016). The role of robotics in promoting the learning motivation to decrease the early school leaving risks. References: p.13. ROBOESL Conference, November 26, 2016, Athens, Greece: Proceedings Athens, 2016, pp. 7–13. Retrieved from http://roboesl.eu/conference/?page_id=508

  • Daniela, L., & Strods, R. (2018). Robot as agent in reducing risks of early school leaving. In L. Daniela (Ed.), Innovations, technologies and research in education (pp. 140–158). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniela, L., Strods, R., Alimisis, D. (2017) Analysis of robotics-based learning interventions for preventing school failure and early school leaving in gender context // 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn17), 3rd-5th July, 2017, Barcelona, Spain: Conference Proceedings Barcelona, pp.810–818. ISBN 9788469737774. ISSN 2340-1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2014). A cross-generational robotics project day: Pre-school children, pupils and grandparents learn together. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, S. E., Lee, K., Cherniak, S., & Cho, E. (2019). Non-sequential learning in a robotics class: Insights from the engagement of a child with Autism spectrum disorder in technology, knowledge and learning, pp. 1–19. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9394-8.

  • Karampinis, T. (2018). Activities and experiences through RoboESL project opportunities. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, 9(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkazis, P., Balourdos, P., Pitsiakos, G., Asimakopoulos, K., Saranteas, I., Spiliou, T., & Roussou, D. (2018). To water or not to water. The Arduino approach for the irrigation of a field. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakoff, E., & Bers, M. (2012). Programming in a robotics context in the kindergarten classroom: The impact on sequencing skills. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(4), 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, put your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). Retrieved from https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.

  • Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T. W. (2016). The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through Lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro, M., Agatolio, F., & Menegatti, E. (2018). The development of robotic enhanced curricula for the RoboESL project: Overall evaluation and expected outcomes. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society (IJSEUS), 9(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevejans, N. (2017). European civil law rules in robotics, European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/fr/supporting-analyses-search.html

  • Niku, S. B. (2011). Introduction to robotics: Analysis, control, applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntemngwa, C., & Oliver, J. S. (2018). The implementation of integrated science technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) instruction using robotics in the middle school science classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 6(1), 12–40. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1983). Talking Turtle. Horizon, Part 1 – 02:48 to 03:10. BBC and the Open University. Retrieved from http://research.roamer-educational-robot.com/1983/12/14/talking-turtle/

  • Papert, S. (1984). New theories for new learnings. School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronsivalle, G. B., Boldi, A., Gusella, V., Inama, C., & Carta, S. (2018). How to implement educational robotics’ programs in Italian schools: A brief guideline according to an instructional design point of view in Technology, knowledge and learning (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9389-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Kommers, P., Zuziak, W., & Gladun, M. (2017). Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2017-0024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sünderhauf, N., Leitner, J., & Milford, M. (2016). Robotics: Science and systems (RSS) workshop. Are the sceptics right? Limits and potentials of deep learning in robotics. Retrieved from http://juxi.net/workshop/deep-learning-rss-2016/

  • Sünderhauf, N., Brock, O., Scheirer, W., Hadsell, R., Fox, D., Leitner, J., et al. (2018). The limits and potentials of deep learning for robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 37(4–5, 405), –420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364918770733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. C., Yuxin, M., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon, E. B., Schunn, C. D., Higashi, R. M., & Shoop, R. (2018). Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaldivar, D., Cuevas, E., Pérez-Cisneros, M. A., Sossa, J. H., Rodríguez, J. G., & Palafox, E. O. (2013). An educational fuzzy-based control platform using LEGO robots. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 50(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.50.2.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Daniela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

EVALUATION INSTRUMENT for detecting students who are at risk of ESL

EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

General information about student

Student ____________________________________________ (code of the student)

____ (age)

Subject/s you teach for particular student _________________________________

☐ subject teacher ☐ class coordinator/class teacher ☐ robotics teacher

Average evaluation grade for the 1st term for all subjects _______

Three learning subjects with LOWEST grade for the 1st term (starting from the lowest):

average mark

Three learning subjects with HIGHEST grade for the 1st term (starting from the highest):

average

grade

1.

 

1.

 

2.

 

2.

 

3.

 

3.

 

Missed lessons 3 months before starting participation in activities

Number of missed lessons

1. Excused by doctor

 

2. Excused for other reasons (parents etc.)

 

3. Without an excuse

 

Difficulties which influence learning

Mark with ‘X’ if the statement characterizes the student

Has learning difficulties connected with reading

 

Has learning difficulties connected with calculation

 

Has difficulties in understanding graphs and schemes

 

Has other different learning difficulties

 

Has other special needs

 

Has attention concentration problems

 

Attitude to learning

Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always

Completes homework

 

Cooperates with teachers in a positive way

 

Cooperates with classmates during lessons in a positive way

 

Is ready for work in lessons

 

Understands the connection between learning and achievements

 

Is ready to do extra assignments to improve achievements

 

Obeys behavioural rules in classroom

 

Is ready to join out-of-class/school activities together with other classmates

 

Is involved in sport/art activities not connected with learning at school

 

Knows that the learning is important for him/her

 

Problem-solving skills

Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always

Solves the learning problems by himself/herself

 

Asks for help from teachers

 

Solves conflicts in a calm way

 

Motivation

Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always

Is motivated to learn the subject you teach

 

Is motivated to understand his/her mistakes to correct them

 

Is motivated to improve achievements

 

Is motivated to overcome difficulties in learning

 

Has an aim and works to achieve it

 

Observed problems

Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always

Is late for the beginning of lessons

 

Has problematic behaviour during recess (break)

 

Is aggressive to other students

 

Is aggressive to teachers

 

Uses rude language with classmates

 

Uses rude language with teachers

 

Refuses doing assignments during the lessons

 

In situation of conflict reacts aggressively

 

Appendix 2

Hello! You are going to learn how to work with Robots! Congratulations! It is fun! Before starting learning, can you answer some questions? Your responses are anonymous!

  1. 1.

    I am:

    ☐ boy ☐ girl

    I am ______years old (your age)

    2. Learning and achievements

    Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = sometimes agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree

    3.1. Learning is fun

     

    3.2. My achievements depend on my learning

     

    3.3. I do all the homework

     

    3.4. I like to cooperate with my classmates in lessons

     

    3.5. I like to work individually to do assignments

     

    3.6. I like to do extra assignments

     

    3.7. I like it when there are different activities in lessons

     

    3.8. I like it when I can do something active in lessons

     

    3.9. I like to solve learning problems by myself

     

    3.10. I like to look for extra information needed for learning

     

    3. If you miss lessons it happens because

    Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, 5 = never

    4.1. I was sick or had an appointment with the doctor

     

    4.2. I had to participate in another activity – sports, art, etc.

     

    4.3. I had to help my parents

     

    4.4. It was an unpredictable situation

     

    4.5. I had to work

     

    4.6. I had to babysit my sister/brother

     

    4.7. I did not want to go to school

     

    4.8. I overslept

     

    4.9. I did not want to meet my classmates

     

    4.10. I do not like learning

     
  2. 5.

    Please write here the three learning subjects you like the most

    1. 5.1.

      _______________________________________

    2. 5.2.

      _______________________________________

    3. 5.3.

      _______________________________________

  3. 6.

    Please write here the three learning subjects you like the least

    1. 6.1.

      _______________________________________

    2. 6.2.

      _______________________________________

    3. 6.3.

      _______________________________________

Appendix 3

Protocol of observation

Teacher_________________________

Legend: 0 = can’t be observed, 1 = low level, 2 = can be observed almost in all situations, 3 = can be observed during all projects, 4 = does more than expected

A grid format depicts the twelve statements of criteria in rows and the code of the student in the column.

Appendix 4

Dear Teacher,

Please assess the changes in the attitude of the student who has participated in the activities. Use the same code for the student as was used before the activities. This survey is very important. It will take approximately 5 min to fill in the questionnaire. Thank you in advance for your time.

Student _______________________________________________ (code)

Gender_____

Subject/s you teach _________________________________________________

Attitude to learning (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s attitude)

Please evaluate these statements about the student’s attitude on a scale of 1−5, where:

1 = no changes at all

2 = some signs of improvement observed occasionally/rarely

3 = some signs of improvement observed sometimes

4 = signs of improvement observed in most situations

5 = strong improvement observed in all situations

Preparation of homework

 

Cooperation with teachers in a positive way

 

Cooperation with classmates during lessons in a positive way

 

Readiness for work in lessons

 

Understanding of the connection between learning and achievements

 

Readiness to do extra assignments to improve achievements

 

Following of the behavioural rules in the classroom

 

Readiness to join out-of-class/school activities together with other classmates

 

Readiness to join activities led by other classmates

 

Readiness to reach learning aims

 

Motivation (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s motivation)

Please evaluate these statements about the student’s motivation on a scale of 1−5, where:

1 = no changes at all

2 = some signs of improvement observed occasionally/rarely

3 = some signs of improvement observed sometimes

4 = signs of improvement observed in most situations

5 = strong improvement observed in all situations

Motivation to learn the subject you teach

 

Motivation to understand his/her mistakes to correct them

 

Motivation to improve achievements

 

Motivation to overcome difficulties in learning

 

Readiness to work hard to achieve the aim

 

Observed problems (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s behaviour)

Please evaluate these statements about the student’s behaviour on a scale of 1-5, where:

1 = no changes at all

2 = some signs of positive improvement observed occasionally/rarely

3 = some signs of positive improvement observed sometimes

4 = signs of positive improvement observed in most situations

5 = strong positive improvement observed in all situations

Being late for the beginning of lessons

 

Problematic behaviour during recess (break)

 

Aggressiveness to other students

 

Aggressiveness to teachers

 

Using rude language with classmates

 

Using rude language with teachers

 

Refuses to do assignments during the lessons

 

Aggressive reaction in situations of conflict

 

Problem-solving skills

Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where

1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always

Solves the learning problems by himself/herself

 

Asks for help from teachers

 

Solves the conflicts in a calm way

 

Thank you!

Appendix 5

You had a wonderful opportunity to learn how to work with robotics. We hope you enjoyed that! Can you answer some questions about your experience? Your responses are anonymous!

  1. 1.

    I am:

    ☐ boy ☐ girl

  2. 2.

    I am ______years old (your age)

  3. 3.

    Which robotics activities did you like most? Please name at least three of them

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

  1. 4.

    Which robotics activities were most challenging? Please name them

    ____________________________________________

    ____________________________________________

    ____________________________________________

    ____________________________________________

    5. Learning with robots

    Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = sometimes agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree

    5.1. Learning by using robots was fun

     

    5.2. I have learned how to program robots

     

    5.3. I liked to work in groups to do assignments with robots

     

    5.4. I liked to make calculations for programming

     

    5.5. I can use this knowledge in other activities

     

    5.6. I liked to solve problems with programming by myself

     

    5.7. I liked that others helped me to solve problems with programming

     

    5.8. I liked to look for extra information needed for using robots

     

    5.9. Other outcome (please name it)

     

    6. Activities with robots helped me to improve my:

    Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = somehow agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree

    6.1. understanding of maths

     

    6.2. understanding of physics

     

    6.3. understanding of informatics and technologies

     

    6.4 attitude to learning

     

    6.5. cooperation skills with my classmates

     

    6.6. cooperation skills with teachers

     

    6.7. other outcome (please name it)

     
  2. 7.

    Please write here three learning subjects where your learning outcomes improved

    1. 7.1.

      _______________________________________

    2. 7.2.

      _______________________________________

    3. 7.3.

      _______________________________________

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daniela, L., Strods, R., France, I. (2019). Activities with Educational Robotics: Research Model and Tools for Evaluation of Progress. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Smart Learning with Educational Robotics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19912-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19913-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics