Abstract
The use of robots in the learning process has been popular since S. Papert developed his LOGO Turtle idea and argued that students can construct their own knowledge, test their constructive solutions and be motivated to learn if they use robotics in the learning process. Today, the idea of using elements of robotics in the learning process is no longer new and innovative but there are still elements that can be developed and issues that should be discussed. In this chapter, the authors provide the research model and five research tools (structured observation protocol, evaluation of the possible risks of early school leaving to be filled in by teachers before and after activities, students’ questionnaires to be filled in before and after activities) for evaluating the outcomes of organized after-school robotics activities. The research model and tools were tested and approbated with students who are at risk of early school leaving and students who participate in robotics activities to develop computational thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alimisis, D. (2014). Educational robotics in teacher education: An innovative tool for promoting quality education. In L. Daniela, I. Lūka, L. Rutka, I. Žogla (Eds.), Teacher of the 21st century: Quality education for quality teaching (pp. 28–39). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-5612-6.
Ariza, D. V., Palacio, A. M., Aragón, I. P., Pulido, C. M., Logreira, E. A., & McKinley, J. R. (2017). Application of color sensor programming with LEGO-Mindstorms NXT 2.0 to recreate a simplistic plague detection scenario. Scientia et Technica, 22(3), 268–272.
Bargagna, S., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dario, P., Dell’Omo, M., et al. (2018). Educational robotics in Down Syndrome: A feasibility study. Technology, knowledge and learning, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z.
Bell, P., Bricker, L., Tzou, C., Lee, T., & Van Horne, K. (2012). Exploring the science framework: Engaging learners in science practices related to obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. Science Scope, 36(3), 18–22.
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, D., Ferari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/
Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Salvini, P., & Dario, P. (2018). Can educational robotics introduce young children to robotics and how can we measure it? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning., 34, 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12304.
Catlin, D., & Blamires, M. (2018) Designing robots for special needs education. Technology, knowledge and learning, 1–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9378-8.
Cejka, E., Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2006). Kindergarten robotics: Using robotics to motivate math, science, and engineering literacy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(4), 711–722.
Danahy, E., Wang, E., Brockman, J., Carberry, A., Shapiro, B., & Rogers, C. B. (2014). LEGO-based robotics in higher education: 15 years of student creativity. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. https://doi.org/10.5772/58249.
Daniela, L. (2016) Preliminary results of the project ‘Robotics-based learning interventions for preventing school failure and early school leaving. ICERI 9th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation Proceedings (pp. 4336–4344). ISBN: 978-084-0617-05895-01. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.
Daniela, L., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Educational robotics for inclusive education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9397-5.
Daniela, L., & Strods, R. (2016). The role of robotics in promoting the learning motivation to decrease the early school leaving risks. References: p.13. ROBOESL Conference, November 26, 2016, Athens, Greece: Proceedings Athens, 2016, pp. 7–13. Retrieved from http://roboesl.eu/conference/?page_id=508
Daniela, L., & Strods, R. (2018). Robot as agent in reducing risks of early school leaving. In L. Daniela (Ed.), Innovations, technologies and research in education (pp. 140–158). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0622.
Daniela, L., Strods, R., Alimisis, D. (2017) Analysis of robotics-based learning interventions for preventing school failure and early school leaving in gender context // 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn17), 3rd-5th July, 2017, Barcelona, Spain: Conference Proceedings Barcelona, pp.810–818. ISBN 9788469737774. ISSN 2340-1117.
Eck, J., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2014). A cross-generational robotics project day: Pre-school children, pupils and grandparents learn together. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/2.
Jung, S. E., Lee, K., Cherniak, S., & Cho, E. (2019). Non-sequential learning in a robotics class: Insights from the engagement of a child with Autism spectrum disorder in technology, knowledge and learning, pp. 1–19. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9394-8.
Karampinis, T. (2018). Activities and experiences through RoboESL project opportunities. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, 9(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.
Karkazis, P., Balourdos, P., Pitsiakos, G., Asimakopoulos, K., Saranteas, I., Spiliou, T., & Roussou, D. (2018). To water or not to water. The Arduino approach for the irrigation of a field. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.
Kazakoff, E., & Bers, M. (2012). Programming in a robotics context in the kindergarten classroom: The impact on sequencing skills. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(4), 371–391.
Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, put your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.f.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). Retrieved from https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T. W. (2016). The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through Lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 143–156.
Moro, M., Agatolio, F., & Menegatti, E. (2018). The development of robotic enhanced curricula for the RoboESL project: Overall evaluation and expected outcomes. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society (IJSEUS), 9(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.
Nevejans, N. (2017). European civil law rules in robotics, European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/fr/supporting-analyses-search.html
Niku, S. B. (2011). Introduction to robotics: Analysis, control, applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ntemngwa, C., & Oliver, J. S. (2018). The implementation of integrated science technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) instruction using robotics in the middle school science classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 6(1), 12–40. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380617.
Papert, S. (1983). Talking Turtle. Horizon, Part 1 – 02:48 to 03:10. BBC and the Open University. Retrieved from http://research.roamer-educational-robot.com/1983/12/14/talking-turtle/
Papert, S. (1984). New theories for new learnings. School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422–428.
Ronsivalle, G. B., Boldi, A., Gusella, V., Inama, C., & Carta, S. (2018). How to implement educational robotics’ programs in Italian schools: A brief guideline according to an instructional design point of view in Technology, knowledge and learning (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9389-5.
Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Kommers, P., Zuziak, W., & Gladun, M. (2017). Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2017-0024.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3–20.
Sünderhauf, N., Leitner, J., & Milford, M. (2016). Robotics: Science and systems (RSS) workshop. Are the sceptics right? Limits and potentials of deep learning in robotics. Retrieved from http://juxi.net/workshop/deep-learning-rss-2016/
Sünderhauf, N., Brock, O., Scheirer, W., Hadsell, R., Fox, D., Leitner, J., et al. (2018). The limits and potentials of deep learning for robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 37(4–5, 405), –420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364918770733.
Williams, D. C., Yuxin, M., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201–216.
Witherspoon, E. B., Schunn, C. D., Higashi, R. M., & Shoop, R. (2018). Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12219.
Zaldivar, D., Cuevas, E., Pérez-Cisneros, M. A., Sossa, J. H., Rodríguez, J. G., & Palafox, E. O. (2013). An educational fuzzy-based control platform using LEGO robots. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 50(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.50.2.5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
EVALUATION INSTRUMENT for detecting students who are at risk of ESL
EVALUATION INSTRUMENT
General information about student
Student ____________________________________________ (code of the student)
____ (age)
Subject/s you teach for particular student _________________________________
☐ subject teacher ☐ class coordinator/class teacher ☐ robotics teacher
Average evaluation grade for the 1st term for all subjects _______
Three learning subjects with LOWEST grade for the 1st term (starting from the lowest): | average mark | Three learning subjects with HIGHEST grade for the 1st term (starting from the highest): | average grade |
1. | 1. | ||
2. | 2. | ||
3. | 3. |
Missed lessons 3 months before starting participation in activities | Number of missed lessons |
1. Excused by doctor | |
2. Excused for other reasons (parents etc.) | |
3. Without an excuse |
Difficulties which influence learning Mark with ‘X’ if the statement characterizes the student | |
Has learning difficulties connected with reading | |
Has learning difficulties connected with calculation | |
Has difficulties in understanding graphs and schemes | |
Has other different learning difficulties | |
Has other special needs | |
Has attention concentration problems | |
Attitude to learning Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always | |
Completes homework | |
Cooperates with teachers in a positive way | |
Cooperates with classmates during lessons in a positive way | |
Is ready for work in lessons | |
Understands the connection between learning and achievements | |
Is ready to do extra assignments to improve achievements | |
Obeys behavioural rules in classroom | |
Is ready to join out-of-class/school activities together with other classmates | |
Is involved in sport/art activities not connected with learning at school | |
Knows that the learning is important for him/her | |
Problem-solving skills Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always | |
Solves the learning problems by himself/herself | |
Asks for help from teachers | |
Solves conflicts in a calm way | |
Motivation Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always | |
Is motivated to learn the subject you teach | |
Is motivated to understand his/her mistakes to correct them | |
Is motivated to improve achievements | |
Is motivated to overcome difficulties in learning | |
Has an aim and works to achieve it | |
Observed problems Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always | |
Is late for the beginning of lessons | |
Has problematic behaviour during recess (break) | |
Is aggressive to other students | |
Is aggressive to teachers | |
Uses rude language with classmates | |
Uses rude language with teachers | |
Refuses doing assignments during the lessons | |
In situation of conflict reacts aggressively |
Appendix 2
Hello! You are going to learn how to work with Robots! Congratulations! It is fun! Before starting learning, can you answer some questions? Your responses are anonymous!
-
1.
I am:
☐ boy ☐ girl
I am ______years old (your age)
2. Learning and achievements
Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = sometimes agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree
3.1. Learning is fun
3.2. My achievements depend on my learning
3.3. I do all the homework
3.4. I like to cooperate with my classmates in lessons
3.5. I like to work individually to do assignments
3.6. I like to do extra assignments
3.7. I like it when there are different activities in lessons
3.8. I like it when I can do something active in lessons
3.9. I like to solve learning problems by myself
3.10. I like to look for extra information needed for learning
3. If you miss lessons it happens because
Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, 5 = never
4.1. I was sick or had an appointment with the doctor
4.2. I had to participate in another activity – sports, art, etc.
4.3. I had to help my parents
4.4. It was an unpredictable situation
4.5. I had to work
4.6. I had to babysit my sister/brother
4.7. I did not want to go to school
4.8. I overslept
4.9. I did not want to meet my classmates
4.10. I do not like learning
-
5.
Please write here the three learning subjects you like the most
-
5.1.
_______________________________________
-
5.2.
_______________________________________
-
5.3.
_______________________________________
-
5.1.
-
6.
Please write here the three learning subjects you like the least
-
6.1.
_______________________________________
-
6.2.
_______________________________________
-
6.3.
_______________________________________
-
6.1.
Appendix 3
Protocol of observation
Teacher_________________________
Legend: 0 = can’t be observed, 1 = low level, 2 = can be observed almost in all situations, 3 = can be observed during all projects, 4 = does more than expected
Appendix 4
Dear Teacher,
Please assess the changes in the attitude of the student who has participated in the activities. Use the same code for the student as was used before the activities. This survey is very important. It will take approximately 5 min to fill in the questionnaire. Thank you in advance for your time.
Student _______________________________________________ (code)
Gender_____
Subject/s you teach _________________________________________________
Attitude to learning (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s attitude) Please evaluate these statements about the student’s attitude on a scale of 1−5, where: 1 = no changes at all 2 = some signs of improvement observed occasionally/rarely 3 = some signs of improvement observed sometimes 4 = signs of improvement observed in most situations 5 = strong improvement observed in all situations | |
Preparation of homework | |
Cooperation with teachers in a positive way | |
Cooperation with classmates during lessons in a positive way | |
Readiness for work in lessons | |
Understanding of the connection between learning and achievements | |
Readiness to do extra assignments to improve achievements | |
Following of the behavioural rules in the classroom | |
Readiness to join out-of-class/school activities together with other classmates | |
Readiness to join activities led by other classmates | |
Readiness to reach learning aims | |
Motivation (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s motivation) Please evaluate these statements about the student’s motivation on a scale of 1−5, where: 1 = no changes at all 2 = some signs of improvement observed occasionally/rarely 3 = some signs of improvement observed sometimes 4 = signs of improvement observed in most situations 5 = strong improvement observed in all situations | |
Motivation to learn the subject you teach | |
Motivation to understand his/her mistakes to correct them | |
Motivation to improve achievements | |
Motivation to overcome difficulties in learning | |
Readiness to work hard to achieve the aim | |
Observed problems (statements are the same as in the first questionnaire, but evaluation is based on changes in the student’s behaviour) Please evaluate these statements about the student’s behaviour on a scale of 1-5, where: 1 = no changes at all 2 = some signs of positive improvement observed occasionally/rarely 3 = some signs of positive improvement observed sometimes 4 = signs of positive improvement observed in most situations 5 = strong positive improvement observed in all situations | |
Being late for the beginning of lessons | |
Problematic behaviour during recess (break) | |
Aggressiveness to other students | |
Aggressiveness to teachers | |
Using rude language with classmates | |
Using rude language with teachers | |
Refuses to do assignments during the lessons | |
Aggressive reaction in situations of conflict | |
Problem-solving skills Please evaluate these statements about the student on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always | |
Solves the learning problems by himself/herself | |
Asks for help from teachers | |
Solves the conflicts in a calm way |
Thank you!
Appendix 5
You had a wonderful opportunity to learn how to work with robotics. We hope you enjoyed that! Can you answer some questions about your experience? Your responses are anonymous!
-
1.
I am:
☐ boy ☐ girl
-
2.
I am ______years old (your age)
-
3.
Which robotics activities did you like most? Please name at least three of them
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
-
4.
Which robotics activities were most challenging? Please name them
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
5. Learning with robots
Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = sometimes agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree
5.1. Learning by using robots was fun
5.2. I have learned how to program robots
5.3. I liked to work in groups to do assignments with robots
5.4. I liked to make calculations for programming
5.5. I can use this knowledge in other activities
5.6. I liked to solve problems with programming by myself
5.7. I liked that others helped me to solve problems with programming
5.8. I liked to look for extra information needed for using robots
5.9. Other outcome (please name it)
6. Activities with robots helped me to improve my:
Please evaluate these statements on a scale of 1−5, where 1 = completely disagree, 2 = rarely agree, 3 = somehow agree, 4 = mostly agree, 5 = completely agree
6.1. understanding of maths
6.2. understanding of physics
6.3. understanding of informatics and technologies
6.4 attitude to learning
6.5. cooperation skills with my classmates
6.6. cooperation skills with teachers
6.7. other outcome (please name it)
-
7.
Please write here three learning subjects where your learning outcomes improved
-
7.1.
_______________________________________
-
7.2.
_______________________________________
-
7.3.
_______________________________________
-
7.1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniela, L., Strods, R., France, I. (2019). Activities with Educational Robotics: Research Model and Tools for Evaluation of Progress. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Smart Learning with Educational Robotics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19912-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19913-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)