Skip to main content

Cognitive AI Systems Contribute to Improving Creativity Modeling and Measuring Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Understanding the Brain Function and Emotions (IWINAC 2019)

Abstract

Cognitive science and cognitive psychology have long used creativity tests to measure and investigate the relationships between creativity, creative problem solving and other cognitive abilities. Implementing cognitive systems that can model and/or solve creativity tests can shed light on the cognitive process, and presents the possibility of building much more precise creativity measuring tools. This paper describes four cognitive AI systems related to the Remote Associates Test (RAT) and their contributions to creativity science. comRAT-C is a system that solves the RAT, correlating with human performance. comRAT-G reverse engineers this process to generate RAT queries with a high degree of parameter control. fRAT generates functional RAT queries, resurrecting a theoretical concept proposed by researchers many decades ago. The visual RAT takes advantage of the formal conceptualization necessary for computational implementation, to expand the RAT to the visual domain. All the cognitive systems and generated RAT queries have been successfully validated with human participants and have contributed in improving creativity modeling and measuring tools.

Supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) through the Creative Cognitive Systems project OL 518/1-1 (CreaCogs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arden, R., Chavez, R.S., Grazioplene, R., Jung, R.E.: Neuroimaging creativity: a psychometric view. Behav. Brain Res. 214(2), 143–156 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowden, E.M., Jung-Beeman, M.: Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35(4), 634–639 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colton, S., Wiggins, G.A.: Computational creativity: the final frontier? In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 21–26. IOS Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mednick, S.: The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol. Rev. 69(3), 220 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mednick, S.A., Mednick, M.: Remote Associates Test: Examiner’s Manual. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., Schreiber, T.A.: The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36(3), 402–407 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olteţeanu, A.M.: Two general classes in creative problem-solving? An account based on the cognitive processes involved in the problem structure - representation structure relationship. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, January 2014. Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olteţeanu, A.M.: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence (C3GI2016), vol. 1767. CEUR-Ws, Osnabrück (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olteţeanu, A.M., Falomir, Z.: comRAT-C - A computational compound remote associates test solver based on language data and its comparison to human performance. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 67, 81–90 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olteţeanu, A.M., Gautam, B., Falomir, Z.: Towards a visual remote associates test and its computational solver. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition 2015, vol. 1510, pp. 19–28. CEUR-Ws (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Olteţeanu, A.M., Schottner, M., Schuberth, S.: Computationally resurrecting the functional remote associates test using cognitive word associates and principles from a computational solver. Knowl. Based Syst. 168, 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Olteţeanu, A.M., Schultheis, H.: What determines creative association? Revealing two factors which separately influence the creative process when solving the remote associates test. J. Creat. Behav. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olteţeanu, A.M., Schultheis, H., Dyer, J.B.: Computationally constructing a repository of compound remote associates test items in American English with comRAT-G. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0965-8

  15. Olteţeanu, A.M., Zunjani, F.H.: A visual remote associates test and its validation. Behav. Res. Methods (Submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olteteanu, A.M.: A cognitive systems framework for creative problem solving. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Bremen (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olteţeanu, A.-M.: From simple machines to eureka in four not-so-easy steps: towards creative visuospatial intelligence. In: Müller, V.C. (ed.) Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. SL, vol. 376, pp. 159–180. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Olteţeanu, A.M., Falomir, Z.: Object replacement and object composition in a creative cognitive system. Towards a computational solver of the alternative uses test. Cogn. Syst. Res. 39, 15–32 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palermo, D.S., Jenkins, J.J.: Word Association Norms: Grade School Through College (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tucker, A.: Applied Combinatorics. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Worthen, B.R., Clark, P.M.: Toward an improved measure of remote associational ability. J. Educ. Meas. 8(2), 113–123 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faheem Hassan Zunjani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zunjani, F.H., Olteţeanu, AM. (2019). Cognitive AI Systems Contribute to Improving Creativity Modeling and Measuring Tools. In: Ferrández Vicente, J., Álvarez-Sánchez, J., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, J., Adeli, H. (eds) Understanding the Brain Function and Emotions. IWINAC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11486. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19591-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19591-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19590-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19591-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics