Abstract
The internet’s evolution has had a profound influence on how people acquire medical information. The innovation of web 2.0 has been regarded as the primary motivating factor for people who want to access health-related education. In this work, we identify the URL categories that Twitter users incorporate into their messages when engaging in two selected health-related topics (MMR vaccines and healthy diets). Moreover, we identify the categories of influential message authors who engage in these two topics. Finally, we explore the relationship between different user categories and their patterns of URL sharing. Our results show that when it comes to influential users sharing fake news, users discussing vaccine-related topics were more than twice as likely to share a fake news URLs than those discussing healthy diets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The lexicons are shared in this GitHub repository: https://bit.ly/2EiT6l5.
References
Shearer, E., Gottfried, J.: News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center (2017)
Miller, L.M.S., Bell, R.A.: Online health information seeking: the influence of age, information trustworthiness, and search challenges. J. Aging Health 24(3), 525–541 (2012)
Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Health online 2013 (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
Gualtieri, L.N.: The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first. In: Proceedings of the CHI’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2009)
Morahan-Martin, J., Anderson, C.D.: Information and misinformation online: recommendations for facilitating accurate mental health information retrieval and evaluation. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3(5), 731–746 (2000)
Antheunis, M.L., Tates, K., Nieboer, T.E.: Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ. Couns. 92(3), 426–431 (2013)
Moorhead, S.A., Hazlett, D.E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J.K., Irwin, A., Hoving, C.: A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(4), e85 (2013)
Freeman, K.S., Spyridakis, J.H.: An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Tech. Commun. 51(2), 239–263 (2004)
Eysenbach, G.: Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. In: Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 123–154 (2008)
Kitchens, B., Harle, C.A., Li, S.: Quality of health-related online search results. Decis. Support Syst. 57, 57454–57462 (2014)
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM (2011)
Kinsella, S., Wang, M., Breslin, John G., Hayes, C.: Improving categorisation in social media using hyperlinks to structured data sources. In: Antoniou, G., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6644, pp. 390–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21064-8_27
The Media Insight Project. ‘Who shared it?’ How Americans decide what news to trust on social media, 12 June 2017. http://mediainsight.org/Pages/%27Who-Shared-It%27-How-Americans-Decide-What-News-to-Trust-on-Social-Media.aspx
Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information—a survey. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Discov. 7(5), e1209 (2013)
Munson, S.A., Cavusoglu, H., Frisch, L., Fels, S.: Sociotechnical challenges and progress in using social media for health. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(10), e226 (2013)
Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media. ACM (2012)
Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics. ACM (2010)
Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Twitter explodes with activity in mumbai blasts! A lifeline or an unmonitored daemon in the lurking? Technical report, IIITD-TR-2011-005, Delhi (2011)
Morris, M.R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., Schwarz, J.: Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM (2012)
Addawood, A., Rezapour, R., Mishra, S., Schneider, J., Diesner, J.: Developing an information source lexicon (2017)
Rao, A., Spasojevic, N., Li, Z., DSouza, T.: Klout score: measuring influence across multiple social networks. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Proceedings of the Big Data (Big Data). IEEE (2015)
Krauss, M.J., et al.: Hookah-related Twitter chatter: a content analysis. Preventing chronic Dis. 12, E121 (2015)
Liu, Y.: Mining social media to understand consumers’ health concerns and the public’s opinion on controversial health topics (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Addawood, A., Balakumar, P., Diesner, J. (2019). Categorization and Comparison of Influential Twitter Users and Sources Referenced in Tweets for Two Health-Related Topics. In: Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., Nardi, B. (eds) Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11420. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15741-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15742-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)