Skip to main content

L’administration Conjointe du Dossier Patient: Une Responsabilité Partagée Entre le Patient et le Praticien

  • Chapter
Systèmes d’information pour l’amélioration de la qualité en santé

Abstract

The main problem faced by patients, health practitioners and the authorities, is namely the gathering and updating of administrative and medical data in order to accurately reconstitute a patient’s medical history. Although solutions to accelerate and to ease this gathering are being implemented at the national level in several European countries, as unique health identifier in France, information still have to be validated before use. Through this article, we propose a mixed management of patients’ data, split between the patient regarding administrative information and the Medical Practitioner (MP) regarding medical information. This method is based on two processes. The first process aims to obtain from health structures a list of probable cases of care provided to the patient. After validation by the patient (i.e. real or not care providing), the aim of the second process is to provide a patient’s medical information and to validate it under the accountability of the MP with the help of the patient if needed. During these two processes, the patient’s privacy will be ensured through cryptographic hash functions like the Secure Hash Algorithm, which allows pseudonymisation of a patient’s identity. Our method, based on specific Medical Record Search Engines can lead to improved efficiency of personal medical record management regarding information gathering. The other interest is, by the use of several combinations of identifiers, to make available some data, initially unreachable due to inefficiency of recently developed tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Quantin C, Allaert F, Fassa M, Avillach P, Fieschi M, Cohen O. Interoperability issues regarding patient identification in Europe. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 6161

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bremond M, Fieschi M. Le partage d’informations dans le système de santé. Les tribunes de la santé 2008; 21: 111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones PS, Meleis AI. Health is empowerment. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1993; 15(3): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lau DH. Patient empowerment—a patient-centred approach to improve care. Hong Kong Med J 2002; 8(5): 372–374

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baars JE, Markus T, Kuipers EJ, van der Woude CJ. Patients’ preferences regarding shared decision-making in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a patient-empowerment study. Digestion 2010; 81(2): 113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burton D, Blundell N, Jones M, Fraser A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80(2): 173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerris J, De Sutter P. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET): a step towards more patient-centred ART? Hum Reprod 2009; 25(3): 562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larkin GL, Beautrais AL, Spirito A, Kirrane BM, Lippmann MJ, Milzman DP. Mental health and emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16(11): 1110–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez JE, Orrell M, Morgan L, Warner J. Empowerment in older psychiatric inpatients: development of the empowerment questionnaire for inpatients (EQuIP). Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18(1): 21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tariman JD, Berry DL, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A, Schepp K. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2009; 21(6): 1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Visse MA, Teunissen T, Peters AGAW, Abma TA. Dialogue for air, air for dialogue: towards shared responsabilities in COPD practice. Health Care Anal 2010; 18(4): 358–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. Public standards and patients’ control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ 2001; 322(7281): 283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rostad L, ed. An initial model and a discussion of access control in patient controlled health records. The third international conference on availability, reliability and security IEEE. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neubauer T, Riedl B. Improving patients privacy with Pseudonymization. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 691–696

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneier B. Applied Cryptography — Protocols Algorithms, and source code in C. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1995; 758 p

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quantin C, Jaquet-Chiffelle DO, Coatrieux G, Fassa M, Allaert FA, eds. Medical record search engines, using pseudonymised patient identity: an alternative to centralised medical records. Collaborative meetings on health informatics (CoMHI 2009), IMIA WG4 (SiHIS); 2009 21-25 November 2009; Hiroshima

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform 2001; 61(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Quantin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quantin, C., Benzenine, É., Auverlot, B., Jaquet-Chiffelle, DO., Coatrieux, G., Allaert, FA. (2011). L’administration Conjointe du Dossier Patient: Une Responsabilité Partagée Entre le Patient et le Praticien. In: Staccini, P.M., Harmel, A., Darmoni, S.J., Gouider, R. (eds) Systèmes d’information pour l’amélioration de la qualité en santé. Informatique et Santé, vol 1. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0285-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0285-5_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0284-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0285-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics