Skip to main content

Prototyping versus Formal Development

  • Conference paper
Improvements in System Safety
  • 524 Accesses

Guidance on safety-critical development usually advocates very formal development methods, but heavyweight methods can be expensive, and on many projects informal development also plays a part. This paper looks at the advantages and disadvantages of various development styles, and discusses how they can be blended to create a methodology which is both safe and practical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

9 References

  1. Steve King, Jonathan Hammond, Rod Chapman, Andy Pryor, Is Proof More Cost-Effective Than Testing?, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol 26 No 8, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jorgy Rady de Almeida et al, Best Practices in Code Inspection for SafetyCritical Software, IEEE Software, May/June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allan Wassyng, Mark Lawford, Software tools for safety-critical software development, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology, 8(4/5): 337-354, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R Johansson, A fault-tolerant architecture for computer-based railway vehicle brake systems, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Vol 218 Part F, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert L Glass, Inspections - Some Suprising Findings, Practical Programmer, Communications of the ACM, April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barry Boehm and Victor R Basili, Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List, IEEE Computer, January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ainsworth, M. (2008). Prototyping versus Formal Development. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Improvements in System Safety. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-100-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-100-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-099-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-100-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics