Skip to main content

The Development of Computer-Aided System for Tissue Scaffolds (CASTS) System for Functionally Graded Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 868))

Abstract

Computer-aided system for tissue scaffolds (CASTS) is an in-house parametric library of polyhedral units that can be assembled into customized tissue scaffolds. Thirteen polyhedral configurations are available to select, depending on the biological and mechanical requirements of the target tissue/organ. Input parameters include the individual polyhedral units and overall scaffold block as well as the scaffold strut diameter. Taking advantage of its repeatability and reproducibility, the scaffold file is then converted into.STL file and fabricated using selective laser sintering, a rapid prototyping system. CASTS seeks to fulfill anatomical, biological, and mechanical requirements of the target tissue/organ. Customized anatomical scaffold shape is achieved through a Boolean operation between the scaffold block and the tissue defect image. Biological requirements, such as scaffold pore size and porosity, are unique for different type of cells. Matching mechanical properties, such as stiffness and strength, between the scaffold and target organ is very important, particularly in the regeneration of load-bearing organ, i.e., bone. This includes mimicking the compressive stiffness variation across the bone to prevent stress shielding and ensuring that the scaffold can withstand the load normally borne by the bone. The stiffness variation is tailored by adjusting the scaffold porosity based on the porosity–stiffness relationship of the CASTS scaffolds. Two types of functional gradients based on the gradient direction include radial and axial/linear gradient. Radial gradient is useful in the case of regenerating a section of long bones while the gradient in linear direction can be used in short or irregular bones. Stiffness gradient in the radial direction is achieved by using cylindrical unit cells arranged in a concentric manner, in which the porosity decreases from the center of the structure toward the outside radius, making the scaffold stiffer at the outer radius and more porous at the center of the scaffold. On the other hand, the linear gradient is accomplished by varying the strut diameter along the gradient direction. The parameters to vary in both gradient types are the strut diameter, the unit cell dimension, and the boundaries between two scaffold regions with different stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Risbud M (2001) Tissue engineering: Implications in the treatment of organ and tissue defects. Biogerontology 2(2):117–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Gui WS, Tan WS, Wiria FE (2005) Selective laser sintering of biocompatible polymers for applications in tissue engineering. Bio-Med Mater Eng 15(1–2):113–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vacanti CA (2006) History of tissue engineering and a glimpse into its future. Tissue Eng 12(5):1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross KA, Rodríguez-Lorenzo LM (2004) Biodegradable composite scaffolds with an interconnected spherical network for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25(20):4955–4962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Müeller R, Griffith LG (2001) Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 7(5):557–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang SF, Leong KF, Du ZH, Chua CK (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7(6):679–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang SF, Leong KF, Du ZH, Chua CK (2002) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. Tissue Eng 8(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parenteau NL, Hardin-Young J, Ross RN (2000) Skin. In: Lanza RP, Langer R, Vacanti J (eds) Principles of tissue engineering. Academic, San Diego, USA, pp 879–890

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA (1998) Skeletal tissue mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, xiv, p 392

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sherwood JK, Riley SL, Palazzolo R, Brown SC, Monkhouse DC, Coates M, Griffith LG, Landeen LK, Ratcliffe A (2002) A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articular cartilage repair. Biomaterials 23(24):4739–4751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Naing MW, Chua CK, Leong KF, Wang Y (2005) Fabrication of customised scaffolds using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques. Rapid Prototyping J 11(4):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ford RG, Miyamoto Y, Nogata F (1999) Lessons from nature. In: Miyamoto Y, Kaysser WA, Rabin BH, Kawasaki A, Ford RG (eds) Functionally graded materials: design, processing and applications. Kluwer, Boston, pp 7–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woodfield TBF, Malda J, de Wijn J, Peters F, Riesle J, van Blitterswijk CA (2004) Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 25(18):4149–4161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo XE (2001) Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In: Cowin SC (ed) Bone mechanics handbook. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 10.1–10.23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kreeger PK, Shea LD (2002) Scaffolds for directing cellular responses and tissue formation. In: Dillow AK, Lowman AM (eds) Biomimetic materials and design. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp 283–309

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ciapetti G, Ambrosio L, Savarino L, Granchi D, Cenni E, Baldini N, Pagani S, Guizzardi S, Causa F, Giunti A (2003) Osteoblast growth and function in porous poly [var epsilon]-caprolactone matrices for bone repair: a preliminary study. Biomaterials 24(21):3815–3824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R (2003) Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 5:1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Edlund U, Albertsson AC (2001) Degradable polymer microspheres for controlled drug delivery. In: Albertsson AC (ed) Degradable aliphatic polyesters. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–112

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stridsberg KM, Ryner M, Albertsson AC (2001) Controlled ring-opening polymerization: polymers with designed macromolecular architecture. In: Albertsson AC (ed) Degradable aliphatic polyesters. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–65

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engelberg I, Kohn J (1991) Physico-mechanical properties of degradable polymers used in medical applications: A comparative study. Biomaterials 12(3):292–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hakkarainen M, Albertsson AC (2002) Heterogeneous biodegradation of polycaprolactone – Low molecular weight products and surface changes. Macromol Chem Physic 203(10–11):1357–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheah CM, Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheong CH, Naing MW (2004) An automatic algorithm for generating complex ployhedral scaffolds for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 10(3–4):595–610

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hollister SJ, Lin CY, Saito E, Lin CY, Schek RD, Taboas JM, Williams JM, Partee B, Flanagan CL, Diggs A, Wilke EN, Van Lenthe GH, Muller R, Wirtz T, Das S, Feinberg SE, Krebsbach PH (2005) Engineering craniofacial scaffolds. Orthod Craniofac Res 8(3): 162–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chee Kai Chua .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Sudarmadji, N., Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F. (2012). The Development of Computer-Aided System for Tissue Scaffolds (CASTS) System for Functionally Graded Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds. In: Liebschner, M. (eds) Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 868. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-763-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-764-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics