Abstract
Proteases play crucial roles in all steps of tumor progression including cancer cell migration. In fact, uncontrolled proteolytic activity could lead to the degradation of different components of the extracellular matrix which facilitates dissemination of tumor cells. However, numerous studies have revealed that proteases may also exert tumor-protective actions which could impede progression of malignant cells. Consequently, it is crucial to distinguish those situations in which proteases promote tumor growth from those in which exhibit tumor-suppressive effects. In this regard, analysis of the influence of a particular protease on the capacity of a cell line to migrate can be employed as an approach to better understand its involvement in tumorigenesis. Different experimental designs have been developed to investigate cell migration. Herein, we describe a barrier assay to monitor cell migration, which overcomes some disadvantages of traditional methods such as the Boyden chamber or the wound healing assays. The version of the barrier assay explained in this chapter allows to examine cell migration through the analysis of the closure of a premade 500 μm wound. This method also facilitates comparison between two different situations in a given cell line (i.e., gene up- or downregulation) in the same assay and under the same conditions. Additionally, migration can be monitored and measured using a time lapse microscope which facilitates further analysis through different softwares.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Keely P, Nain A (2015) Capturing relevant extracellular matrices for investigating cell migration. F1000Res 4:pii: F1000 Faculty Rev-1408. 10.12688/f1000research.6623.1
Durbec P, Franceschini I, Lazarini F et al (2008) In vitro migration assays of neural stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 438:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-133-8_18
Polacheck WJ, Zervantonakis IK, Kamm RD (2013) Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments. Cell Mol Life Sci 70(8):1335–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1115-1
Yamaguchi H, Condeelis J (2007) Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773(5):642–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.07.001
Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z (2014) Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(12):786–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3904
Mason SD, Joyce JA (2011) Proteolytic networks in cancer. Trends Cell Biol 21(4):228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.002
Fischer A (1946) Mechanism of the proteolytic activity of malignant tissue cells. Nature 157:442
Lopez-Otin C, Matrisian LM (2007) Emerging roles of proteases in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer 7(10):800–808. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2228
Sato H, Takino T (2010) Coordinate action of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) and MMP-2 enhances pericellular proteolysis and invasion. Cancer Sci 101(4):843–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01498.x
Stracke JO, Hutton M, Stewart M et al (2000) Biochemical characterization of the catalytic domain of human matrix metalloproteinase 19. Evidence for a role as a potent basement membrane degrading enzyme. J Biol Chem 275(20):14809–14816
Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z (2010) Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 141(1):52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.015
Masui T, Hosotani R, Tsuji S et al (2001) Expression of METH-1 and METH-2 in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7(11):3437–3443
Cal S, Lopez-Otin C (2015) ADAMTS proteases and cancer. Matrix Biol 44-46:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.013
Kelwick R, Desanlis I, Wheeler GN et al (2015) The ADAMTS (A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin motifs) family. Genome Biol 16:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0676-3
Esselens C, Malapeira J, Colome N et al (2010) The cleavage of semaphorin 3C induced by ADAMTS1 promotes cell migration. J Biol Chem 285(4):2463–2473. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.055129
Rodriguez-Manzaneque JC, Carpizo D, Plaza-Calonge Mdel C et al (2009) Cleavage of syndecan-4 by ADAMTS1 provokes defects in adhesion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(4):800–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.08.014
Fontanil T, Rua S, Llamazares M et al (2014) Interaction between the ADAMTS-12 metalloprotease and fibulin-2 induces tumor-suppressive effects in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 5(5):1253–1264. 10.18632/oncotarget.1690
Kramer N, Walzl A, Unger C et al (2013) In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. Mutat Res 752(1):10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.08.001
Sun M, Zaman MH (2017) Modeling, signaling and cytoskeleton dynamics: integrated modeling-experimental frameworks in cell migration. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1365
Yarrow JC, Perlman ZE, Westwood NJ et al (2004) A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods. BMC Biotechnol 4:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-21
Zorn ML, Marel AK, Segerer FJ et al (2015) Phenomenological approaches to collective behavior in epithelial cell migration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853(11 Pt B):3143–3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.021
Van Horssen R, ten Hagen TL (2011) Crossing barriers: the new dimension of 2D cell migration assays. J Cell Physiol 226(1):288–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22330
Kroening S, Goppelt-Struebe M (2010) Analysis of matrix-dependent cell migration with a barrier migration assay. Sci Signal 3(126):pl1. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.3126pl1
Ashby WJ, Zijlstra A (2012) Established and novel methods of interrogating two-dimensional cell migration. Integr Biol (Camb) 4(11):1338–1350. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ib20154b
Lobastova L, Kraus D, Glassmann A et al (2017) Collective cell migration of thyroid carcinoma cells: a beneficial ability to override unfavourable substrates. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 40(1):63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-016-0305-5
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Strober W (2015) Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol 111:A3.B.1–A3.B.3. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Fontanil, T., Mohamedi, Y., Cal, S., Obaya, Á.J. (2018). Assessing the Influence of a Protease in Cell Migration Using the Barrier-Migration Assay. In: Cal, S., Obaya, A. (eds) Proteases and Cancer. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1731. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7595-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7595-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7594-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7595-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols