Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

At first glance, the attempts by personality theorists to provide a taxonomy of personality traits seem to have achieved little in the way of consensus. However, as Eysenck and Eysenck (1985) demonstrated, many (or even most) of the disagreements concerning the number and nature of major personality dimensions stem from looking at the same reality from rather different perspectives. Thus, for example, it is relatively straightforward to reconcile Cattell’s emphasis on 16 personality factors (PF) with Eysenck’s claim that there are only three major dimensions of personality (i. e., extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism). Because Cattell’s factors are correlated, it is possible to extract second-order factors. When this is done, Cattell’s 16 PF yields factors of exvia and anxiety that correspond closely to the Eysenckian dimensions of extraversion and neuroticism, respectively (Barrett & Kline, 1980; Hundleby & Connor, 1968).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, P., & Kline, P. The location of superfactors P, E, and N within an unexplored factor space. Personality and Individual Differences, 1980, 1, 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock, B. A. H. Repression-sensitization, word association responses, and incidental recall. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., & DePree, J. A. Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1983, 21, 9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. Discussant at Mood and Cognition Symposium, Cognitive Psychology Section, British Psychological Society, Oxford, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G., & Monteiro, K. P. Selectivity of learning caused by affective states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981, 110, 451–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., & Mayer, J. D. Failure to replicate mood-dependent retrieval. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1985, 23, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behavior Research & Therapy, 1983, 5, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. Repression-sensitization and duration of visual attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 949–950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsouka, M. M. Handbook for the Sixteen Factor Personality Questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign, Il.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H., Gale, A., & Kline, P. Personality and habituation of the orienting reaction: Tonic and response measures of electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 54–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. J. The hierarchy of consistency: A review and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 1983, 4, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craske, M. G., & Craig, K. D. Musical performance anxiety: The three-systems model and self-efficacy theory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1984, 22, 267–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. F. Preconscious processing. Chichester: Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S. Interactionism: A personality model, but not yet a theory. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Personality—current theory and research. London: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. The biological basis of personality. Springfield, Il.: Charles C Thomas, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. The conditioning model of neurosis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1979, 2, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. Personality and individual differences. London: Plenum Press, 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. Anxiety and the worry process. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1984, 22, 545–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. Personality, stress arousal, and cognitive processes in stress transactions. In R. W. J. Neufeld (Ed.), Advances in investigation of psychological stress. New York: Wiley, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. Is there any need for conditioning in Eysenck’s conditioning model of neurosis?. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1979, 2, 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. Issues in the neuropsychology of anxiety. In A. H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. London: Erlbaum, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. The cognitive structures and processes of human motivation and personality. Chichester: Wiley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. N. Approach-avoidance reactions by repressors and sensitizers to ambiguity in a structured free-association. Psychological Reports, 1973, 33, 97–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hundleby, J. D., & Connor, W. H. Interrelationships between personality inventories: The 16 PF, the MMPI and the MPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 152–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. & Martin, I. Autonomic reactivity, eyelid-conditioning and their relationship to neuroticism and extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1969, 7, 233–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krohne, H. W., & Rogner, J. Repression-sensitization as a central construct in coping research. In H. W. Krohne & L. Laux (Eds.), Achievement, stress, and anxiety. London: McGraw-Hill, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response stereotypy. American Journal of Psychology, 1958, 71, 50–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lader, M., & Wing, L. Physiological measures, sedative drugs, and morbid anxiety. Oxford: Maudsley Monograph, No. 14, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. The application of psychophysiological methods to the study of psychotherapy and behavior modification. In A. Bergin and S. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, P. M., Berquist, W. H., & Brelje, T. The repression-sensitization dimension and emotional response to stimuli. Psychological Reports, 1972, 31, 707–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W. Some questions of strategy in neuropsychological research on anxiety. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982, 5, 490–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety state. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. C., & Petersen, K. E. Electrodermal correlates of extraversion, trait anxiety and schizophrenia. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1976, 17, 73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, P. Coping patterns in shock anticipation and in everyday stress. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974, 15, 268–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, J. G. Individual differences in habituation of human physiological responses: A review of theory, method, and findings in the study of personality correlates in non-clinical populations. Biological Psychology, 1977, 5, 257–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrine, R. J. Repression-sensitization and perceived severity of presenting problems of four hundred and forty-four counseling center clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971, 18, 332–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plouffe, L., & Stelmack, R. M. Neuroticism and the effect of stress on the pupillary light reflex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979, 49, 635–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saville, P., & Blinkhorn, S. Reliability, homogeneity, and the construct validity of Cattell’s 16PF. Personality and Individual Differences, 1981, 2, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schill, T., & Althoff, M. Auditory perceptual thresholds for sensitizers, defensive and nondefensive repressors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 935–938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schill, T., Emanuel, G., Pedersen, V., Schneider, L., & Wachiowiak, D. Sexual reponsivity of defensive and nondefensive sensitizers and repressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 44–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. B. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 96, 316–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. London: Erlbaum, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, L. P. An empirically derived MMPI scale which measures facilitation-inhibition of recognition of threatening stimuli. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1962, 18, 127–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Egeren, L. Repression and sensitization: Sensitivity and recognition criteria. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1968, 3, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G. F. The effects of repression-sensitization on a brightness scaling measure of perceptual defence. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65, 395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 96, 465–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979, 88, 369–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. Personality and mood: State-trait relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 1981, 2, 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eysenck, M.W. (1987). Trait Theories of Anxiety. In: Strelau, J., Eysenck, H.J. (eds) Personality Dimensions and Arousal. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2043-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2043-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2045-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2043-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics