Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine thoroughly the history of South Korean male circumcision and to investigate the factors contributing to the present unusual situation. We surveyed 5,434 South Korean males between the ages of 0 and 92 years regarding their circumcision status, the age at circumcision, and the possible effect of circumcision on their sexuality. In addition, we interviewed 267 practicing medical doctors on their basic understanding regarding circumcision as well as their own circumcision status and history. The circumcision rate in the year 1945 was less than 0.1%. At present, the circumcision rate for high school boys exceeds 90%, and for 80 year olds it is less than 5%. When averaged over the whole population, the present South Korean circumcision rate is about 60%. The circumcision rate increased dramatically over the years and, particularly in the past 20 years, the estimated number of male circumcisions performed has far exceeded the number of male births. Although circumcision in South Korea is not of a religious nature and has been strongly influenced by Americans, it has never been predominantly neonatal. The circumcision age has continued to decrease, and boys are now circumcised at around age 12. Forty-one percent of polled doctors circumcise, but, unlike the United States, gynecologists and pediatricians rarely circumcise. Doctors’ basic knowledge about circumcision is generally lacking, regardless of whether they practice circumcision or not. There exist many interesting misunderstandings among doctors and the general public regarding circumcision’s cultural and geographical aspects, and its correlations with general prosperity and medical advancement. We have documented the unusual history of circumcision in South Korea from the very beginning. The present situation has been created through combinations of many factors. Chief among the contributing factors is the mistaken notion held by both doctors and the general public that circumcision is directly correlated with industrialization and general progress of living standards. Many doctors believe in out-dated and sometimes controversial benefits for circumcision: for instance, prevention of cervical cancer. Not surprisingly, with these beliefs, the vast majority of doctors have recommended circumcision regardless of patient’s age or penile condition. Since millions of Korean males were circumcised long after they had been sexually active, South Korea offers a unique opportunity to study the effect of circumcision on sexuality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Department of Health Statistics, UK 1990–1996.
Shannon FT, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Infant circumcision. New Zealand Med J 1979;90:283. Ken McGrath and Hugh Young, private communications.
Kim DS, Lee JY, Pang MG. Male circumcision: a South Korean perspective. BJU Int 1999;83(Suppl 1):28–33.
Genesis 17.
Holman JR, Stuessi KA. Adult circumcision. Am Fam Physician 1999:59:1514–8.
Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.
Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in United States. Pediatrics 1998; 101:E5.
Frisch M, Friis S, Kruger Kjaer S, Melbye M. Falling incidence of penile cancer in a uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943–90). Br Med J 1995;311:1471.
Rickwood A.M, Hemalatha V, Batcup G, Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 1980;52:147–50.
Øster J. The further fate of the foreskin. Arch Dis Child 1968;43:200–3.
Rickwood AMK. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83 (Suppl 1):45–51.
Lannon CM. Bailey AGD, Fleischman AR, Kaplan GW, Shoemaker CT, Swanson JT, Coustan D. Circumcision policy statement Pediatrics 1999;103:683–93.
Shingleton H, Heath CW Jr. Position of the American Cancer Society, 16 February 1996.
Fischbacher CM. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:669–70.
Van Howe RS, Cold CJ. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:670.
Dalton JD. Circumcision of newborn boys. Lancet 1999;353:670.
Halperin DT, Bailey RC. Male Circumcision and HIV infection: 10 years and counting. Lancet 1999;354:1813.
South Korean Department of Environment, 21 February 2000.
Goldman R. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83 (Suppl 1):93–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pang, MG., Kim, S.C., Kim, D. (2001). Male Circumcision in South Korea. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Understanding Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3375-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3351-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive