Skip to main content

Remediation of Interpersonal and Communication Skills

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Learners may present with deficits in communication and interpersonal skills because of lack of knowledge, unfavorable attitudes, low skill level, or a combination of these factors. Overemphasis on the biomedical interviewing model, learners’ psychological and psychiatric factors or issues of cultural or language diversity may also contribute to communication difficulties. For learners who need remediation in communication and interpersonal skills, the authors describe how they have achieved success by modeling their approach on seven principles of relationship-centered care, coaching, and effective feedback. They also present cases that illustrate these principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(6):476–81. PubMed PMID: 12639081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuo AK, Irby DI, Loeser H. Does direct observation improve medical students’ clerkship experiences? Med Educ. 2005;39(5):518. PubMed PMID: 1584270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers C. On becoming a person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1961. p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milan FB, Parish SJ, Reichgott MJ. A model for educational feedback based on clinical communication skills strategies: beyond the ‘feedback sandwich’. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18:42–7. PubMed PMID: 16354139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooperrider DL, Whitney D. Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2005. p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):173–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02372.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasan M, Hauer KE, Der-Martirosian C, Wilkes M, Gesundheit N. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ. 2007;41(9):857–65. PubMed PMID: 17727526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related fields. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70–81. PubMed PMID: 15383395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knowles M. Adult learning. In: Craig RL, editor. The ASTD training and development handbook (Chapter 12). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang A, Chou CL, Teherani A, Hauer KE. Clinical skills-related learning goals of senior medical students after performance feedback. Med Educ. 2011;45(9):878–85. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04015.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chou CL, Chang A, Hauer KE. Remediation workshop for medical students in patient-doctor interaction skills. Med Educ. 2008;42(5):537. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03055.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cole SA, Bird J. The medical interview: the three function approach. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frankel RM, Stein T. Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. Permanente J. 1999;3(3):79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makoul G. The SEGUE framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;45(1):23–34. PubMed PMID: 11602365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ. 1996;30(2):83–9. PubMed PMID: 8736242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390–3. PubMed PMID: 11299158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalet A, Pugnaire MP, Cole-Kelly K, Janicik R, Ferrara E, Schwartz MD, Lipkin Jr M, Lazare A. Teaching communication in clinical clerkships: models from the Macy initiative in health communications. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):511–20. PubMed PMID: 15165970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fortin AHVI, Dwamena FC, Frankel RM, Smith RC. Smith’s patient-centered interviewing: an evidence-based method. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2012. p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin L. Chou M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chou, C.L., Bell, J., Chou, C.M., Chang, A. (2014). Remediation of Interpersonal and Communication Skills. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9025-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9024-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9025-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics