References
Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, ..., Gebbie KM. Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(1p1):329–46. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x/full.
Bunders JF, Broerse JE, Keil F, Pohl C, Scholz RW, Zweekhorst MB. How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: Knowledge democracy. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 125–52. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_11?LI=true.
Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. The academic firm: a new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. J Innov Entrep. 2016;5(1):12. https://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-016-0040-1.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. J Innov Entrep. 2014;3(1):12. https://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-014-0012-2.
Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy. 2000;29(2):313–30. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733399000694.
Huutoniemi K. Interdisciplinarity as academic accountability: prospects for quality control across disciplinary boundaries. Soc Epistemol. 2016;30(2):163–85. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02691728.2015.1015061.
Jaap R. Towards knowledge democracy. In: Knowledge democracy. Berlin: Springer; 2010a. p. 1–11. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_1.
Jaap R. The harvest of the “Towards Knowledge Democracy” conference. In: Knowledge democracy. Berlin: Springer; 2010b. p. 13–24. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_2.
Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S116–23. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379708004200.
Mansilla VB, Feller I, Gardner H. Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education. Res Eval. 2006;15(1):69–74. https://academic.oup.com/rev/article-abstract/15/1/69/1570977.
Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(11):1343–57. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027795369290038R.
Schartinger D, Rammer C, Fischer MM, Fröhlich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Res Policy. 2002;31(3):303–28. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733301001111.
Spaapen J, Dijstelbloem H, Wamelink F. Evaluating research in context: a method for comprehensive assessment. 2nd ed. The Hague: Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for Research and Development (COS); 2007.
Van Rijn S, Tissen RJ. The public knowledge challenge: where the management of cities and businesses converge towards creativity, innovation and prosperity. Nyenrode Research Papers Series NRI09-10, Nyenrode Business Universiteit; 2009. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_14?LI=true.
Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy. 2011;40(3):463–72. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733310002362.
Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW, Keyton J, Börner K. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. J Informet. 2011;5(1):14–26. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157710000581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Fabrykowska, A. (2017). Innovation in Interdisciplinarity: Four Different Dimensions. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200084-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200084-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences