Abstract
Archaeoastronomical field survey typically involves the measurement of structural orientations (i.e., orientations along and between built structures) in relation to the visible landscape and particularly the surrounding horizon. This chapter focuses on the process of analyzing the astronomical potential of oriented structures, whether in the field or as a desktop appraisal, with the aim of establishing the archaeoastronomical “facts”. It does not address questions of data selection (see instead Chap. 25, “Best Practice for Evaluating the Astronomical Significance of Archaeological Sites”) or interpretation (see Chap. 24, “Nature and Analysis of Material Evidence Relevant to Archaeoastronomy”). The main necessity is to determine the azimuth, horizon altitude, and declination in the direction “indicated” by any structural orientation. Normally, there are a range of possibilities, reflecting the various errors and uncertainties in estimating the intended (or, at least, the constructed) orientation, and in more formal approaches an attempt is made to assign a probability distribution extending over a spread of declinations. These probability distributions can then be cumulated in order to visualize and analyze the combined data from several orientations, so as to identify any consistent astronomical associations that can then be correlated with the declinations of particular astronomical objects or phenomena at any era in the past. The whole process raises various procedural and methodological issues and does not proceed in isolation from the consideration of corroborative data, which is essential in order to develop viable cultural interpretations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aveni AF (1980) Skywatchers of ancient Mexico. University of Texas Press, Austin
Aveni AF (2001) Skywatchers. University of Texas Press, Austin
Belmonte JA, Shaltout M, Fekri M (2009) Astronomy, landscape and symbolism: a study of the orientation of ancient Egyptian temples. In: Belmonte JA, Shaltout M (eds) In search of cosmic order: selected essays on Egyptian archaeoastronomy. Supreme Council of Antiquities Press, Cairo, pp 215–283
Bradley RJ (1998) The significance of monuments. Routledge, London
Freeman PR, Elmore W (1979) A test for the significance of astronomical alignments. Archaeoastronomy 1(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 10):S86–S96
González-García AC, Belmonte JA (2010) Statistical analysis of megalithic tomb orientations in the Iberian Peninsula and neighbouring regions. Journal for the History of Astronomy 41:225–238
Heggie DC (1981) Megalithic science. Thames and Hudson, London
Higginbottom G, Smith A, Simpson K, Clay R (2000) Gazing at the horizon: sub-cultural differences in western Scotland? In: Esteban C, Belmonte JA (eds) Oxford VI and SEAC99: astronomy and cultural diversity. Organismo Autónomo de Museos del Cabildo de Tenerife, La Laguna, pp 43–50
Hoskin MA (2001) Tombs, temples and their orientations. Ocarina Books, Bognor Regis
Lynch A (1982) Astronomy and stone alignments in S.W. Ireland. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the Old World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–213
McCluskey SC (2007) Calendrical cycles, the eighth day of the world, and the orientations of English churches. In: Ruggles CLN, Urton G (eds) Skywatching in the ancient world: new perspectives in cultural astronomy. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 331–353
Pimenta F, Tirapicos L, Smith A (2009) A Bayesian approach to the orientations of central Alentejo megalithic enclosures. Archaeoastronomy: Journal of Astronomy in Culture 22:1–20
Prendergast FT (2001) Orientation for archaeoastronomy – a geodetic perspective. In: Ruggles CLN, Prendergast FT, Ray TP (eds) Astronomy, cosmology and landscape. Ocarina Books, Bognor Regis, pp 175–186
Ruggles CLN (1982) Megalithic astronomical sightlines: current reassessment and future directions. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the Old World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–105
Ruggles CLN (1984a) Megalithic astronomy: the last five years. Vistas in Astronomy 27:231–289
Ruggles CLN (1984b) A new study of the Aberdeenshire recumbent stone circles, 1: Site data. Archaeoastronomy 6(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 15):S55–S79
Ruggles CLN (1984c) Megalithic astronomy: a new archaeological and statistical study of 300 western Scottish sites, vol 123. BAR British series. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford
Ruggles CLN (1999) Astronomy in prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Yale University Press, New Haven
Ruggles CLN (2005) Ancient astronomy: an encyclopedia of cosmologies and myth. ABC–CLIO, Santa Barbara
Thom A (1955) A statistical examination of the megalithic sites in Britain. J Roy Stat Soc A118:275–291
Thom A (1967) Megalithic sites in Britain. Oxford University Press, London
Thom A (1971) Megalithic lunar observatories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Thomas J (1991) Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tilley C (1994) A phenomenology of landscape. Berg, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ruggles, C.L.N. (2015). Analyzing Orientations. In: Ruggles, C. (eds) Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6140-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6141-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics