Skip to main content

A Peace-building Paradigm for Peace Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Peace Psychology in Australia

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

Whilst not prominent in psychological approaches to peace – both in Australia and internationally – ‘peacebuilding’ is an important and distinct paradigm in the multidisciplinary field of peace studies and conflict resolution. Contributions towards understanding and approaching direct violence have been more prominent with psychology than the more positive focus of peacebuilding. In this chapter, peacebuilding is presented as an important part of peace psychology into the future. This chapter provides a brief familiarisation of the peacebuilding paradigm (and how peace psychology may be situated to contribute therein). The theoretical emphasis is on the influential peacebuilding approach of scholar-practitioner John Paul Lederach, as representative of a contemporary peacebuilding paradigm that aims to develop more culturally derived, less linear and more inclusive (multi-level and multi-sectoral) approaches to peace. How reconciliation is understood and situated within the peacebuilding paradigm is also given attention because it contrasts with the more discrete treatment it receives in psychology and the Australian context. The chapter considers whether peacebuilding as a paradigm can enhance efforts by Australian scholars and practitioners to contribute to the building of a sustainable peace. An extension of this is whether we can link contemporary peacebuilding endeavours to more strategic and reflective practice – to develop, challenge or even transform our own thinking, approaches and methods for peace psychology in Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a fuller discussion of this debate and others relating to peace-building see: www.peace-buildinginitiative.org

  2. 2.

    A theory of change deals with such questions as: What are the sources of the problem being addressed? What needs to change? How can change be brought about? How does a particular initiative contribute to the desired change? Who is best placed to do this?

References

  • Anderson, M., & Olson, L. (2003). Confronting war: Critical lessons for peace practitioners. Reflecting on peace practice project. Cambridge, MA: The Collaborative for Development Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros, B.-G. (1992). An agenda for peace. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63(6), 540–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CDA Collaborative Learning Projects Reflecting on Peace Practice (RPP) Project Website. (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2011, from www.cdainc.com

  • CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (2009). Reflecting on Peace Practice: Participant Training Manual. CDA Collaborative Learning Projects: Cambridge, MA. Last retrieved on December 11, 2011 from: http://www.cdainc.com/cdawww/pdf/manual/rpp_training_participant_­manual_rev_20090104_Pdf.pdf

  • Dugan, M. (1996). A nested theory of conflict. Women in Leadership, 1(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1976). Three approaches to peace: Peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peacebuilding. In J. Galtung (Ed.), Peace, War and defence: Essays in peace research, Vol. II (pp. 297–298). Copenhagen, Denmark: Christian Ejlers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (2005). The moral imagination: The Art and soul of building peace. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacebuilding Initiative website (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2010, at www.peacebuildinginitiative.com

  • Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reconciliation Australia Website (n.d.). Last retrieved on January 10, 2010, from http://www.reconciliation.org.au

  • United Nations. (1992, June 17). Report of the secretary general. An agenda for peace (A/47/277-S/24111). Retrieved from the web on June 20, 2011, from http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html

  • United Nations. (1998). Report of the secretary general. Report 66. Retrieved from web (The Peacebuilding Initiative Website) on January 10, 2011, from www.peacebuildinginitiative.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania Miletic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miletic, T. (2012). A Peace-building Paradigm for Peace Psychology. In: Bretherton, D., Balvin, N. (eds) Peace Psychology in Australia. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1403-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics