Skip to main content

OPAL: Toward the Computer-Aided Design of Oncology Advice Systems

  • Chapter
Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

Creating the knowledge base of an expert system, as when developing any model, requires the abstraction of some reality. The important aspects of a problem area must be identified and extracted. The often difficult process of identifying, extracting, and representing those important domain aspects for use by an expert system is called knowledge acquisition. Successful knowledge acquisition is often considered the major obstacle in the construction of knowledge-based advice systems.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchanan BG, Barstow D, Bechtal R, Bennett J, Clancey W, Kulikowski C, Mitchell T, Waterman DA: Constructing an expert system. p. 127. In Hayes-Roth F, Waterman DA, Lenat DB (eds): Building Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuhrim S, Reggia JA: Feasibility of physician-developed expert systems, Med Decis Making 6:23, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mars NJI, Miller PL: Knowledge acquisition and verification tools for medical expert systems. Med Decis Making 7(1):6, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boose JH: A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology. Int J Man-Machine Stud 23:495, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett JS: ROGET: a knowledge-based system for acquiring the conceptual structure of a diagnostic expert system. Automated Reasoning 1(1):49, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis R: Interactive transfer of expertise: acquisition of new inference rules. Artif Intell 12:121, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Politakis P, Weiss SM: Using empirical analysis to refine expert system knowledge bases. Artif Intell 22:23, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shortliffe EH, Scott AC, Bischoff MB, van Melle W, Jacobs CD: ONCOCIN: an expert system for oncology protocol management. p. 876. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hickam DH, Shortliffe EH, Bischoff MB, Scott AC, Jacobs CD: A study of the treatment advice of a computer-based cancer chemotherapy protocol advisor. Ann Intern Med 101:928, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Musen MA, Fagan LM, Combs DM, Shortliffe EH: Facilitating knowledge entry for an oncology therapy advisor using a model of the application area. p. 46. In: Proceedings of MEDINFO 86. Fifth World Congress on Medical Informatics, Washington, DC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Musen MA, Fagan LM, Combs DM, Shortliffe EH: Use of a domain model to drive an interactive knowledge-editing tool. Int J Man-Machine Stud 26:105, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Musen MA, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH: Graphical specification of procedural knowledge for an expert system. p. 15. In Hendler J (ed): Expert Systems: The User Interface, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musen MA, Langlotz CP, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH: Rationale for knowledge base redesign in a medical advice system. p. 197. In: Proceedings of AAMSI Congress 85. San Francisco: American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kahn MG, Ferguson JC, Shortliffe EH, Fagan LM: Representation and use of temporal information in ONCOCIN. p. 172. In Ackerman MJ (ed): Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore: IEEE Computer Society, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lane CD, Walton JD, Shortliffe EH: Graphical access to medical expert systems. II. Design of an interface for physicians. Methods Inf Med 25:143, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Raeder G: A survey of current graphical programming techniques. Computer 18(8):11, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Combs DM, Musen MA, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH: Graphical specification of procedural and inferential knowledge. p. 298. In Proceedings of AAMSI Congress 86. Anaheim, CA: American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Musen MA, Rohn JA, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH: Knowledge engineering for a clinical trial advice system: uncovering errors in protocol specification. p. 24. In Proceedings of AAMSI Congress 86. Anaheim, CA: American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gruber T, Cohen P: Design for acquisition: principles of knowledge system design to facilitate knowledge acquisition. Int J Man-Machine Stud 26:143, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindberg DAB, Sharp GC, Kingsland LC, Weiss SM, Hayes SP, Ueno H, Hazelwood SE: Computer based rheumatology consultant. p. 1311. In: Proceedings MEDINFO 80. Third World Conference of Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA: EXPERT: a system for developing consultation models. p. 942. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Tokyo, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindberg DAB, Kingsland LC, Roeseler DR, Sharp GC: A new knowledge representation for diagnosis in rheumatology. p. 299. In: Proceedings: AMIA Congress 82. San Francisco: American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stollerman GH, Markowitz M, Taranta A, Wanamaker LW, Whittemore R: Jones criteria (revised) for guidance in the diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Circulation 32:664, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Norman DA: Cognitive engineering. p. 31. In Norman DA, Draper SW (eds): User Centered System Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Musen MA: Generation of Model-Based Knowledge-Acquisition Tools for Clinical-Trial Advice Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Report STAN-CS-88–1194, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musen, M.A., Combs, D.M., Walton, J.D., Shortliffe, E.H., Fagan, L.M. (1988). OPAL: Toward the Computer-Aided Design of Oncology Advice Systems. In: Miller, P.L. (eds) Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8779-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8777-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics