Skip to main content

Buffering of Arctic Plant Responses in a Changing Climate

  • Chapter
Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 124))

Abstract

Responses of plants to predicted global climate change are complex, and will depend on the magnitude and interaction of changes among a suite of environmental variables (e.g., atmospheric CO2 concentration, air and soil temperature, amount and seasonal distribution of precipitation, radiation regime, etc).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, M., and Jonasson, S. 1986. Rodent cycles in relation to food resources on an alpine heath. Oikos46: 93 – 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berendse, F., Oudhof, H., and Bol, J. 1987. A comparative study on nutrient cycling in wet heathland ecosystems. I. Litter production and nutrient losses from the plants. Oecologia74: 174 – 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, L.C., and Matveyeva, N.V. 1992. Circumpolar arctic vegetation. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 59 – 89 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T.V. 1984. Growth and translocation in a clonal southern hemisphere sedge Uncinia meridensis. J. Ecol. 72: 529 – 546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T.V., Carlsson, B.Ã…., Jónsdóttir, I.S., Svensson, B.M., and Jonasson, S. 1992. Clonal plants and environmental change: introduction to the proceedings and summary. Oikos63: 341 – 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T.V., and Emanuelsson, U. 1985. Population structure and processes of tundra plants and vegetation. In: White, J. (ed.), The Population Structure of Vegetation(pp. 399 – 439 ). Dordrecht: Junk Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, D.M., and Bledsoe, C.S. 1992. Nitrogen fixation in arctic plant communities. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 301 – 319 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S. III. 1987. Environmental control over growth of tundra plants. Ecol Bull. 38: 69 – 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S. III, Barsdate, R.J., and Barel, D. 1978. Phosphorus cycling in Alaskan coastal tundra: A hypothesis for the regulation of nutrient cycling. Oikos 31:189– 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. 1992. Arctic plant physiological ecology in an ecosystem context. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 441 – 451 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S. III, and Shaver, G.R. 1985. Individualistic response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology66: 564 – 576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R.M.M., Chapman, H.M., Abbot, R.J., and Balfour, J. 1993. Potential impact of climate warming on arctic vegetation. Flora188: 367 – 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Moral, R. 1983. Competition as a control mechanism in subalpine meadows. Am. J. Bot.70: 232 – 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTommaso, A., and Aarssen, L.W. 1989. Resource manipulation in natural vegetation: a review. Vegetatio84: 9 – 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.F. 1992. Repsonses of diversity and growth-form dominance to fertility in Alaskan tundra fellfield communities. Arctic Alpine Res. 24: 233 – 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S.D. 1977. The regulation of plant communities by food chains exploiting them. Perspect. Biol. Med.20: 169 – 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature242: 344 – 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, R.W. 1974. Nutrient limitations to plant production in two tundra communities. Can. J. Bot.52: 103 – 116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N.G., Smith, F.E., and Slobodkin, L.B. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. Am. Nat.94: 421 – 425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte, J., and Kinzig, A.P. 1993. Mutualism and competition between plants and decomposers: Implications for nutrient allocation in ecosystems. Am. Nat.141: 829 – 846.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havström, M., Callaghan, T.V., and Jonasson, S. 1993. Differential growth responses of Cassiope tetragona, an arctic dwarf shrub, to environmental perturbations among three contrasting high- and subarctic sites. Oikos66: 389 – 402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, O.W., and Block, W. 1987. Soil biological processes in the North and South. Ecol Bull. 38: 47 – 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S. 1986. Influence of frost heaving on soil chemistry and on the distribution of plant growth forms. Geograf. Annaler68A: 185 – 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S. 1992. Plant responses to fertilization and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality. Oikos63: 420 – 429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S., and Callaghan, T.V. 1992. Root mechanical properties related to disturbance and stress in tundra. New Phytol. 122: 179 – 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S., and Chapin, F.S. III. 1991. Seasonal uptake and allocation of phosphorus in Eriophorum vaginatumL. measured by labelling with 32P. New Phytol. 118: 349 – 357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S., Havström, M., Jensen, M., and Callaghan, T.V. 1993. In situ mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus of arctic soils after perturbations simulating climate change. Oecologia95: 179 – 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S., and Sköld, S-E. 1983. Influence of frost-heaving on vegetation and nutrient regime of polygon-patterned ground. Vegetatio53: 97 – 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jónsdóttir, I.S., and Callaghan, T.V. 1990. Intraclonal translocation of ammonium and nitrate in Carex bigelowiiusing 15N and nitrate reductase assays. New Phytol114: 419 – 428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, D.L., Hinzman, L.D., Woo, M.-K., and Everett, K.R. 1992. Arctic hydrology and climate change. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 35 – 57 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide, R.T. 1991. Nutrient supply, nutrient demand and plant responses to mycor- rhizal infection. New Phytol.117: 365 – 386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C. 1993. C02 fertilization: The great uncertainty in future vegetation development. In: Solomon, A.M., and Shugart, H.H. (eds.), Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change(pp. 53 – 70 ). New York, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marion, G.M., Miller, P.C., Kummerow, J., and Oechel, W.C. 1982. Competition for nitrogen in a tussock tundra ecosystem. Plant Soil66: 317 – 327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, J.B. 1987. Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetalaecotypes. IV. Fitness response to reciprocal transplanting in ecotypes with differing plasticity. Oecologia73: 465 – 468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, J.B., and Chapin, F.S. III. 1989. Competitive ability and adaptation to fertile and infertile soils in two Eriophorumspecies. Ecology70: 736 – 749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, J.B., and Fetcher, N. 1992. Response of tundra plant populations to climatic change. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 359 – 376 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melillo, J.M., Callaghan, T.V., Woodward, F.I., Salati, E., and Sinha, S.K. 1990. Effects on ecosystems. In: Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.T., and Ephraums, J.J. (eds.), Climate Change: The 1PCC Scientific Assessment(pp. 282 – 310 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, K.J., Giblin, A.E., Shaver, G.R., and Laundre, J.L. 1991. Effects of temperature and substrate quality on element mineralization in six arctic soils. Ecology72: 242 – 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, K.J., Giblin, A.E., Shaver, G.R., and Linkins, A.E. 1992. Microbial processes and plant nutrient availability in arctic soils. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 281 – 300 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oechel, W.C., and Billings, W.D. 1992. Effects of global change on the carbon balance of arctic plants and ecosystems. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 139 – 168 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oinonen, E. 1967. Sporal regeneration of bracken in Finland in the light of the dimensions and age of its clones. Acta. Forest. Fenn.83: 3 – 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, L. 1980. Abundance relationships between competitive and grazing- tolerant plants in productivity gradients in Fennoscandian mountains. Ann. Bot. Fenn.17: 410 – 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, L. 1983. Trophic exploitation and arctic phytomass patterns. Am. Nat.122: 45 – 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, L. 1990. Predation, herbivory, and plant strategies along gradients of primary productivity. In: Grace, J.B., and Tilman, D. (eds.), Perspectives on Plant Competition(pp. 445 – 474 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S.D., Arruda, J., and Niemela, P. 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat.118: 240 – 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, L.F., and Ashmun, J.W. 1985. Physiology and integration of ramets in clonal plants. In: Jackson, J.B.C., Buss, L.W., and Cook, R.E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms(pp. 399 – 435 ). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastetter, E.B., McKane, R.B., Shaver, G.R., Nadelhoffer, K.J., and Giblin, A.E. 1993. Potential changes in carbon storage by moist arctic tundra resulting from global change: Constraints imposed by carbon-nitrogen interactions. In: Gilmanov, T., Holten, J.I., Maxwell, B., Oechel, W.C., and Sveinbjörnsson, B. (eds.), Abstracts. Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems. Norway: Oppdal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile, D.B.O. 1972. Arctic Adaptations in Plants. Canada Dept. Agric. Research Branch. Monograph No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, G.R., and Chapin, F.S. III. 1980. Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: Nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology61: 662 – 675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson, M., and Callaghan, T.V. 1991. Strategies of survival in plants of the Fennoscandian tundra. Arctic44: 95 – 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenhunen, J.D., Lange, O.L., Hahn, S., Siegwolf, R., and Oberbauer, S.F. 1992. The ecosystem role of poikilohydric tundra plants. In: Chapin, F.S. III, Jefferies, R.L., Reynolds, J.F., Shaver, G.R., and Svoboda, J. (eds.), Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate. An Ecophysiological Perspective(pp. 213 – 237 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.Q. 1955. The role of food and cover in population fluctuations of the brown lemming at Point Barrow, Alaska. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conferencepp. 166 – 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tissue, D.T., and Oechel, W.C. 1987. Response of Eriophorum vaginatumto elevated C02 and temperature in the Alaskan tussock tundra. Ecology68: 401 – 410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wookey, P.A., Parsons, A.N., Welker, J.M., Potter, J.A., Callaghan, T.V., Lee, J.A., and Press, M.C. 1993. Comparative responses of phenology and reproductive development to simulated climate change in subarctic and high arctic plants. Oikos67: 490 – 502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jonasson, S. (1997). Buffering of Arctic Plant Responses in a Changing Climate. In: Oechel, W.C., et al. Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, vol 124. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2240-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2240-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7468-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2240-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics