Skip to main content

Project Memory in Design

  • Chapter
Industrial Knowledge Management

Abstract

Learning from past projects allows designers to avoid past errors and solve problems. A number of methods define techniques to memorize lessons and experiences from projects. We present in this chapter an overview of these methods by emphasizing their main contributions and their critical points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourigault D. and Lépine P. — Utilisation d’un logiciel d’extraction de terminologie (LEXTER) en acquisition des connaissances, Acquistion et Ingénierie des Connaissances, tendances actuelles, Editions Cépaduès, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brice A. — Design Rationale Management (DRAMA), http://www.quantisci.co.uk/drama

  3. Buckingham Shum S. — Representing Hard-to-Formalise, Contextualised, Multidisciplinary, Organisational Knowledge. Proceedings of AAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, P.9–16, 1997.http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/AIKM97/AIKM97Proc.html

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conklin J.E. and Yakemovic KC.B. — A Process-Oriented Approach to Design Rationale, Human-Computer Interactions, Vol.6, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dieng R., Corby O., Giboin A. et Ribière M. — Methods and Tools for Corporate Knowledge Management, in Proc. of KAW’98, Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ermine J.L., Chaillot M., Bigeon P., Charenton B. et Malavielle D., MKSM a method for knowledge management, Knowledge management: Organization, Competence and Methodology, Proceedings of ISMICK’96, Schreimenmakers ed., Rotterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein M. — Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering Teams, IEEE, Computer Support for Concurrent Engineering, January 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewkowicz M., Zacklad M., MEMO-net, un collecticiel utilisant la méthode de résolution de problème DIPA pour la capitalisation et la gestion des connaissances dans les projets de conception, IC’99, Palaiseau, 14–16 juin 1999, p.119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V.M.E., Moran T.P., — Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.6, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mal vache P. et Prieur P. — Mastering Corporate Experience with the REX Method, Management of Industrial and Corporate Memory, Proceedings of ISMICK’93, Compiègne 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCullough D., Korelsky T. et White M. — Information Management for Release-based Software Evolution Using EMMA, Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matta N., Ribière M., Corby O., Définition d’un modèle de mémoire de projet, INRIA Report, N.3720, June, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Penalva J.M. — SAGACE, la modélisation des systèmes dont la maîtrise est complexe, ILCE, EC2 (Ed), Montpellier, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poitou, J.P. — Documentation is Knowledge: An Anthropological Approach to Corporate Knowledge Management. Proceedings of ISMICK’95, Compiègne, France, 1995, p. 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pomian J. — Mémoire d’entreprise, techniques et outils de la gestion du savoir. Ed Sapientia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ribière M. and Matta N. — Virtual Entreprise and Corporate Memory, Building, Maintaining and Using Organizational Memories, ECAI-98 Workshop, Brighton, August, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ribière M. — Représentation et gestion de multiples points de vue dans le formalisme des graphes conceptuels, Rapport de thèse en Sciences, spécialité informatique, Avril 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.A., Simon, “Administrative behavior: a study of the decison-making processes in administrative organization,” The MacMillan Cy, New York, 3rd edition, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tourtier P.A. — Analyse préliminaire des métiers et de leurs interactions. Rapport intermédiaire, projet GENIE, INRIA-Dassault-Aviation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Heijst G., Schreiber A. Wielinga B., Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 46,1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matta, N., Ribière, M., Corby, O., Lewkowicz, M., Zacklad, M. (2001). Project Memory in Design. In: Roy, R. (eds) Industrial Knowledge Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1075-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0351-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics