Skip to main content

Evolution, Development and Learning — a Nested Hierarchy?

  • Conference paper
Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

The Dynamical Hypothesis [22] is gathering force within cognitive science and within biology. Evolutionary, developmental and learning processes can all be characterised by the DH and any models should try to account for this property. The processes differ in terms of their operational time-scale and the resources each has to hand. Evolution sets the parameters for the dynamical interactions in development and learning. Could all three processes possibly be regarded as a nested hierarchy sharing the same dynamical properties? We ask this question and argue that a DH understanding of the potential evolution of cognitive systems could inform subsequent modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, J. M. (1896) A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, 30 (June), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkow, J. H., Cosrnides L. and Tooby J. (eds.). (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carey, S. and Spelke, E. (1994) Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In: Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31, 187–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992) Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darwin, C. (1859/1985) The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elman, J. L. (1993) Learning and Development in Neural Networks: The Importance of Starting Small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A, Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. (1996) Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gould, J. L. and Marler, P. (1987) Learning by Instinct. Scientific American (January), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendriks-Jansen, H. (1996) Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2 (10), 389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauffman, S. A (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. and Feldman, M. W. (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MacDonald, C. (1995) Classicism versus Connectionism. In: Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. C. MacDonald and G. MacDonald (eds.) London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mayley, G. (1996a) Landscapes, learning costs and genetic assimilation. Evolutionary Computation, 4 (3), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayley, G. (1996b) The evolutionary cost of learning. In: From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour. Maes, P., Mataric, M., Meyer, J-A, Pollack, J., and Wilson, S. (Eds.) London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mayley, G. (1997) Guiding or hiding: Explorations into the effects of learning on the rate of evolution. In: The Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life (ecaI97). P. Husbands and I. Harvey (eds.) http://ai.iit.nrc.ca/baldwinlbibliography.html URL

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quartz, S. R. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1997) The neural basis of development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 20, 537–596

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuels, R. (1998) Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 49, 575–602.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992) The Psychological Foundations of Culture. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Gelder, T. (1998) The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–665

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dickins, T.E., Levy, J.P. (2001). Evolution, Development and Learning — a Nested Hierarchy?. In: French, R.M., Sougné, J.P. (eds) Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-354-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0281-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics