Skip to main content

Genetic Diversity of Two Native Forest Tree Species in Turkey: Pinus brutia Ten. and Cupressus sempervirens L.

  • Chapter
Biodiversity

Abstract

Pinus brutia Ten. and , Cupressus sempervirens L. are important forest tree species in Turkey for various economic and ecological reasons. P. brutia occupies 3.1 million ha. of forest land, which constitutes 36% of the forest areas in the country1. It grows from sea level up to 1500 meters on the Taurus Mountains2,3. This species is one of the most important forest trees in the region, providing both timber resources and amenity in Turkey; and it is preferable for afforestation of dry and degraded areas in the Mediterranean region and elsewhere, due to its wide tolerance range and drought resistance4,5. C. sempervirens L. also grows in several countries with Mediterranean climate6,7. It makes largest natural stands in Koprulu Kanyon National Park in Antalya, Turkey; making occasional mixed stands with P. brutia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1980, Türkiye Orman Envanteri, Orman Bakanitği, Orman Genet Müdürlüğü, Yayin No:13, Seri No: 630.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Critchfieldt, W. B., Little, E. L. Jr., 1966, Geographic distribution of the Pinus of the world, USDA Forest Service, Micellaneous Pub. 991, pp. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Selik, 1958, , İst. Univ. Orm. Fab. Derg.8a, 161–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oppenheimer, H. R., 1967, Mechanisims of Drought resistance in conifers of the Mediterrenean zone and the arid west of the USA. Part 1. Physiological and Anotomical Investigation. Final Report on Project No:A 10-Fs 7, Grant No: FG-Is 119, submitted to Israel, pp. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palmberg, C., 1976, Silvae Genetica, 24 (5–6), 150–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emberger, L., Gaussen, H., Kassas, A., De Philipis, A., 1963, Bioclimatic map of the Mediterranean zone. Arid zone Research, UNESCO-FAO, Paris, pp.58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Papageorgiou, A. C., Anetsos, P. K., Hattemer, H. H., 1994, , Forest Genetics, 1,1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Isik, K., Kara, N., 1997, , Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 113–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korol, L., Kara, N., Isik, K., Schiller, G., 1997, , Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 151–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Isik, K., 1986, Silvae Genetica, 35, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feret, P.P., Bergmann, F., 1976, Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins and Enzymes. In Modern Methods in Forest Genetics Miksche, J.P. (Ed), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adams, W.T., 1993, Application of isozymes in tree breeding. In Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Tanksley, S.D., Orton, T. J. (Eds), Part A. 1993, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Amsterdam, pp. 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conkle, M.T., Hodgskiss, P.D., Nunnally, L.B., Hunter, S.C., 1982, Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: A Laboratory Manual, U.S.D.A. Gen. Techn. Rept. PSW- 64, p.18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kara, N., Korol, L.. Istk. K., Schiller, G.. 1997, Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 155–61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Swofford, L. D., Selander, B. R., 1981, BIOSYS-1, A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in genetics. User manual. Dept. of Genetics and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Il, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nicolic, D., Tucic, N., 1983, , Silvae Genetica, 32(3–4), 80–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Isik, K., Topak, M., Keskin, C., 1987, Kizilçamda (Pinus brutia Ten.) orijin denemeleri. Alti farkli populasyonun beş ayri deneme alaninda ilk alti yildaki büyüme özellikleri. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Orman Ağaçlari ve Tohumlan islah Enstitüsü Yayin No.3, p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scaltsoyiannes, A., Rohr, R., Panetso, K.P., Tsaktsira, M., 1994 Silvae Genetica, 43, 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamrick, J.L., 1989, Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In , Isozymes in Plant Biology (Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., eds.), Chapman and Hall., London, pp. 87–105.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nevo, E., 1978, Theor. Pop. Biol., 13, 129–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamrick, J.L., Milton, J.B., Linhart, Y.B., 1981, Levels of genetic variation in trees: Influence of life history characteristics. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the isozymes of North American Forest Trees and insects (Conkle, M.T., ed.), U.S.D.A. Gen. Techn. Rept. PSW-48, pp. 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaya, N., Işik, K. (2002). Genetic Diversity of Two Native Forest Tree Species in Turkey: Pinus brutia Ten. and Cupressus sempervirens L.. In: Şener, B. (eds) Biodiversity. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9242-0_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9242-0_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4855-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9242-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics