Skip to main content

The Methodology Evaluation System Can Support Software Process Innovation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development
  • 1112 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on an evaluation of software development methodologies and a selection of the appropriate methodology for a concrete project. Seeing that the present status of using development methodologies worldwide and especially in the Czech Republic is not satisfactory, the Methodology Evaluation System METES was created. The METES system is based on common criteria for the methodology selection, but it also takes into account specific conditions of software development in the Czech Republic. The METES system was used for the evaluation of six selected present methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ambler, S. W. Agile software development methods and techniques are gaining traction. In: Dr. Dobb’Portal, August 2006 [online]. Think Services, c2007 [cit. 2007-10-06]. WWW: <http://www.ddj.com/dept/architect/191800169>.

  2. Boehm, B.; and Turner, R. Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Canada: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004. ISBN 0-321-18612-5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchalcevova, A. Methodology Patterns. Orlando 21.07.2004–25.07.2004. In: Chu, Hsing-Wei, Aguilar, Jose, Ferrer, Jose, Syan, Yu-Ru, Cheng, Chin-Bin (eds.). CITSA 2004. Orlando: IIIS, 2004, s. 200–203. ISBN 980-6560-19-1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchalcevova, A. Application of Object-Oriented Principles to the Methodology Area. Karlstad 14.08.2005 –17.08.2005. In: Nilsson, A. G., Gustas, R., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W. G., Wrycza, S., and Zupančič, J. (eds.). ISD’2005. Karlstad: Karlstad University, 2005, pp. 49–57. ISBN 91-85335-72-X.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchalcevova, A. Research of the Use of Agile Methodologies in the Czech Republic. In: Barry, C., Lang, M., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., and Zupancic, J. (eds.). (2008) The Inter-Networked World: ISD Theory, Practice, and Education. New York: Springer, ISBN 978-0387304038.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caffery, F.; Taylor, P.; and Coleman, G. Adept: A Unified Assessment Method for Small Software Companies, In: IEEE Software. Vol. 24, Issue 1, Jan.–Feb. 2007, pp. 24–31 [online] [cit. 2007-10-07]. <ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/52/4052534/04052548.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hecksel, D. L. Methodology Evaluation and Selection. [online] Sun Software Services, Sun Microsystems [cit. 2007-10-07]. WWW: <http://www.davidhecksel.com/projectcontext/whitepaper.html>.

  8. Johnson, J. My Life Is Failure. The Standish Group International, Inc. USA, 2006. ISBN 1-4243-0841-0.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen, D. Agile Alliance Survey: Are We There Yet? [online] C4Media, Inc., USA, c 2006–2007 [cit. 2007-10-06]. WWW: <http://www.infoq.com/articles/agile-alliance-survey-2006>.

  10. Saaty, T. L. Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM (Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics) 102(2): 251–318. http://www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00576.PDF.

  11. Software and Systems Engineering Vocabulary [online] IEEE Computer society, c2008 [cit. 2008-01-30]. WWW: <http://pascal.computer.org/sev_display/index.action>.

  12. Taylor, P. S. Applying an Agility/Discipline Assessment for a Small Software Organisation, Product Focussed Software Process Improvement, 7th International Conf. PROFES 2006, LNCS 4034, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 2006, pp. 290–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work reported in this chapter was supported by the project GA CR 201/08/0663 information systems innovation supporting company competition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alena Buchalcevova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buchalcevova, A. (2011). The Methodology Evaluation System Can Support Software Process Innovation. In: Song, W., et al. Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7355-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7355-9_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7205-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7355-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics