Skip to main content

Monitoring the Earth’s Atmosphere with the Global IMS Infrasound Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies

Abstract

The comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty organization (CTBTO) is tasked with monitoring compliance with the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty (CTBT), which bans nuclear weapon explosions underground, in the oceans, and in the atmosphere. The verification regime includes a globally distributed network of seismic, hydroacoustic, infrasound, and radionuclide stations, which collect and transmit data to the International Data Centre (IDC) in Vienna, Austria, shortly after the data are recorded at each station. The infrasound network defined in the protocol of the CTBT comprises 60 infrasound array stations. Each array is built according to the same technical specifications; it is typically composed of 4–9 sensors, with 1–3 km aperture geometry. This constitutes the first global infrasound network ever built with such a large and uniform distribution of stations.

Infrasound data at the IDC are processed at the station level using the progressive multichannel correlation (PMCC) algorithm, which calculates the signal correlation between sensors at an infrasound array. If the signal is sufficiently correlated and consistent over an extended period of time and frequency range, detection is created. Groups of detections are then categorized according to their propagation and waveform features, and a phase name is assigned for infrasound, seismic, or noise detections.

Nonnoise detections are then used in network processing at the IDC along with seismic and hydroacoustic technologies. The arrival phases detected on the three waveform technologies may be combined and used for locating events in an automatically generated bulletin of events. This automatic event bulletin is routinely reviewed by analysts during the interactive review process. The contribution of infrasound data to the final IDC event bulletin is currently at an early stage of testing and development. The IDC is exploring new software and procedures for fusing infrasound data with data from seismic and hydroacoustic stations. The number of false events generated by the large number of infrasound detections is a factor that complicates the introduction of infrasound data into routine operations. The IDC is currently working on reducing the number of false alarm infrasound events in the automatic bulletin to a manageable number before the analysts routinely review this bulletin.

A large collection of infrasound reference events (IRED) has been built by the IDC during the last few years, originating from natural or man-made sources. Most of the detected signals are associated to local or regional phenomena recorded by a single IMS infrasound station: man-made cultural activity, wind farms, aircraft, artillery exercises, ocean surf, thunderstorms, rumbling volcanoes, iceberg calving, aurora, and avalanches. Other signals may be recorded by several IMS infrasound stations at larger distances: ocean swell, sonic booms, and mountain-associated waves. However, only a small fraction of events meet the event definition criteria considering the Treaty verification mission of the Organization. Candidate event types for the IDC reviewed event bulletin (REB) include atmospheric or surface explosions, meteor explosions, rocket launches, signals from large earthquakes, and explosive volcanic eruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanc E, Millies-Lacroix JC, Issartel LP, Perez S (1997) Detection of nuclear explosions in the atmosphere. Chocs 17:23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JR, Baker GE, Bahavar M (2005) Ambient infrasound noise. Geophys Res Lett 32:L09803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell RN (1986) The Fourier transform and its applications, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Reading, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachet N (2004) Infrasound processing at the IDC – Detection categorization. Infrasound Technology Workshop, Hobart, Tasmania

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachet N, Coyne J, Le Bras R (2006) Latest developments in the automatic and interactive processing of infrasound data at the IDC. Infrasound Technology Workshop, Fairbanks, Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratt SR, Bache TC (1988) Locating events with a sparse network of regional arrays. Bull Seism Soc Am 78:780–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Katz CN, Le Bras R, Flanagan MP, Wang J, Gault AK (2002) Infrasonic signal detection and source location at the Prototype International Data Centre. Pure Appl Geophys 159:1081–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Brachet N, Le Bras R (2008) Enhancements to the CTBTO operational automatic infrasound processing system. Thirtieth Monitoring Research Review, Portsmouth, Virginia, September 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cansi Y (1995) An automatic seismic event processing for detection and location: The P.M.C.C. method. Geophys Res Lett 22:1021–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cansi Y, Klinger Y (1997) An automated data processing method for mini-arrays, CSEM/EMSC European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre. News Lett 11:1021–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie DR, Vivas Veloso JA, Campus P, Bell M, Hoffmann T, Langlois A, Martysevich P, Demirovic E, Carvalho J (2001) Detection of atmospheric nuclear explosions: the infrasound component of the International Monitoring System. Kerntechnik 66:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessa J-X, Virieux J, Lambotte S (2005) Infrasound modeling in a spherical heterogeneous atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett 32:L12808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drob DP, Picone JM, Garcés M (2003) Global morphology of infrasound propagation. J Geophys Res 108(D21):4680. doi:doi:10.1029/2002JD003307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drob D et al (2008a) An empirical model of the earth’s horizontal wind fields: HWM07. J Geophys Res 113:A12304. doi:doi:10.1029/2008JA013668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drob DP, Garcés M, Hedlin MAH, Brachet N (2009) The Temporal Morphology of Infrasound Propagation, Pure and Applied Geophysics (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcés M, Hetzer C (2004) Infrasonic source location using the tau-p method (update). Infrasound Technology Workshop, Hobart, Tasmania

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcés M, Hansen R, Lindquist K (1998) Traveltimes for infrasonic waves propagating in a stratified atmosphere. Geophys J Int 135:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcés M, Fee D, Steffke A, McCormack D, Servranckx R, Bass H, Hetzer C, Hedlin M, Matoza R, Yepes H, Ramon P (2008) Prototype ASHE volcano monitoring system captures the acoustic fingerprint of stratospheric ash injection. EOS v89:377–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RG, Norris DE (2004) Integration of InfraMAP software with near-real-time atmospheric characterizations. BBN Technologies Final Report for Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL/VSBYE) under Contract DTRA01-01-C-0084

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin AE (1991) Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model in the middle and lower atmosphere. J Geophys Res 96:1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin AE, Fleming EL, Manson AH, Schmidlin FJ, Avery SK, Clark RR, Franke SJ, Fraser GJ, Tsuda T, Vial F, Vincent RA (1996) Empirical wind model for the upper, middle, and lower atmosphere. J Atmos Terr Phys 58:1421–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TH, Sverdrup KA (1981) Teleseismic Location techniques and their application to earthquake clusters in the south-central Pacific. Bull Seism Soc Am 71:1105–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bras RJ, Sereno T J (1996) Monitoring nuclear explosion testing in underground and underwater environments, AGU Fall Meeting abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bras RJ, Guern JA, Brumbaugh DA, Hansen JA, Sereno TJ (1999) Integration of seismic, hydroacoustic, infrasound and radionuclide processing at the Prototype International Data Center. 21st Seismic Research Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon A, Guilbert J, Vega A, Garcés M, Brachet N (2002) Ground-coupled air waves and diffracted infrasound from the Arequipa earthquake of June 23, 2001. Geophys Res Lett 29(18):1886. doi:doi:10.1029/2002GL015052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Drob D, Lambotte S, Dessa JX, Lardy M, Bani P, Vergniolle S (2005) Infrasound monitoring of volcanoes to probe high-altitude winds. J Geophys Res 110:D13106. doi:doi:10.1029/2004JD005587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon A, Ceranna L, Garcés M, Drob D, Millet C (2006) On using infrasound from interacting ocean swells for global continuous measurements of winds and temperature in the stratosphere. J Geophys Res 111( D11):D11106. doi:10.1029/2005JD006690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mialle P, Le Pichon A, Vergoz J, Virieux J, and Blanc E (2007) Construction of 3D propagation tables for localizing infrasonic events. Infrasound Technology Workshop, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mialle P, Le Pichon A, Virieux J, Blanc E (2007) Methodology for infrasound source localization using global propagation tables. Eight International Conference on Theoretical and Computational Acoustics, Heraklion, Crete

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JV, Wilson CR, Szuberla CAL (2000) On the analysis of the spatial and temporal structure of natural infrasound signals. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Seismic Research Symposium, New Orleans, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taner MT, Koehler F, Sheriff RE (1979) Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics 44:1041–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virieux J, Garnier N, Blanc E, Dessa J-X (2004) Paraxial raytracing for atmospheric wave propagation. Geophys Res Lett 31:L20106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker RW (1995) Infrasonic monitoring. Proceedings of the 17th annual Seismic Research Symposium, Scottsdale, AZ, September 12–15, pp. 997–1000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the infrasound specialist group at the IDC – Abdou Salam Ndiath, Misrak Fisseha, Mehves Feyza Ocal, Kirill Sitnikov, and Gadi Turyomurugyendo – for their daily contribution to the high quality REB and their dedicated work for promoting infrasound results in IDC operations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brachet, N., Brown, D., Le Bras, R., Cansi, Y., Mialle, P., Coyne, J. (2010). Monitoring the Earth’s Atmosphere with the Global IMS Infrasound Network. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A. (eds) Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics