Abstract
Central to the responsible development of nanotechnologies is an understanding of the risks they pose to the environment. As with any novel material or emerging technology, a scarcity of data introduces potentially high uncertainty in to the characterisation of risk. Early priorities are the identification of key areas of risk uncertainty and the strategic approach for managing and reducing these. This is important as the information subsequently gathered supports decision making and policy development. We identify one important source of uncertainty for the quantification of both hazard and exposure for nanomaterials, the complexity of their behaviour in natural systems. We then outline two approaches for managing this uncertainty, based on experiences with chemicals: one that primarily focuses on hazard and one that initially focuses on exposure. While each approach places emphasis on different information requirements a common feature is the considerable time lag between information gathering and subsequent decision making based on the evidence gathered. Complementary environmental surveillance approaches can act as a safety net, although it is not as yet clear how fit for purpose current monitoring programmes are in this regard.1
Keywords
- Hazard Assessment
- Environmental Risk Assessment
- Environmental Relevance
- Quantitative Risk Assessment
- Risk Assessment Process
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baun, A., Sørensen, S.N., Rasmussen, R.F., Hartmann, N.B., and Koch, C.B. (2007) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of xenobiotic organic compounds in the presence of aqueous suspensions of aggregates of nano-C60, Aquatic Toxicology 86, 379–387.
Baun, A., Hartmann, N.B., Grieger, K., and Kusk, K.O. (2008) Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing, Ecotoxicology 17, 387–395.
Blaser, S.A., Scheringer, M., Macloed, M., and Hungerbuhler, K. (2008) Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles, Science of the Total Environment 390, 396–409.
Cheung, V.V., Owen, R., Depledge, M.H., and Galloway, T.S. (2006) Development of the in vivo chromosome aberration assay in oyster (Crassostrea gigas) embryo-larvae for genotoxicity assessment, Marine Environmental Research 62, S278.
Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology. Francis Pinter Ltd, London, pp 200.
Crane, M., Handy, R.D., Garrod, J., and Owen, R. (2008) Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles, Ecotoxicology 17, 421– 437.
DETR (2000) U.K. Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Available online at www.defra.gov.uk/environment/risk/eramguide/index.htm, last accessed 23 July 2008.
Hagger, J.A., Jones, M.B., Lowe, D., Leonard, D.R.P., Owen, R., and Galloway, T.S. (2008) Application of biomarkers for improving risk assessments of chemicals under the Water Framework Directive: a case study, Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 1111– 1118.
Handy R.D., van der Kammer, F., Lead, J.R., Hassellöv, M., Owen, R., and Crane, M. (2008) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles, Ecotoxicology 17(4), 287–314.
Hassellöv, M., Readman, J.R., Ranville, J.F., and Tiede, K. (2008) Nanoparticle analysis and characterisation methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles, Ecotoxicology 17, 344–361.
HM Government (2005) Characterising the Potential Risks Posed by Engineered Nanoparticles: A First UK Government Research Report. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, HM Government, pp 57. PB 11485. Available online at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/nrcg/, last accessed 23 July 2008.
Kohler, A.R., Som, C., Helland, A., and Gottschalk, F. (2008) Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application lifecycle, Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 927–937.
Linkov, I., and Satterstrom, K. (2008). Nanomaterial risk assessment and risk management: Review of regulatory frameworks. In: Linkov, I., Ferguson, E., Magar, V. (eds), Real Time and Deliberative Decision Making: Application to Risk Assessment for Non-chemical Stressors. Springer, Amsterdam 129–158.
Neal, A., (2008) What can be inferred from bacterium — nanoparticle interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17, 362–371.
OECD Environment Directorate (2008) OECD Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] Project. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/document/23/ 0,3343,en_2649_34379_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html, last accessed 23 July 2008.
Owen, R., and Depledge, M.H. (2005) Nanotechnology and the environment: risks and rewards, Marine Pollution Bulletin 50, 609.
Owen, R., and Handy, R. (2007) Formulating the problems for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials, Environmental Science and Technology 41(16), 5582– 5588.
Paquin, P.R., Gorsuch, J.W., Apte, S., Batley, G.E., Bowles, K.C., Campbell, P.G.C., Delos, C.G., Di Toro, D.M., Dwyer, R.L., Galvez, F., Gensemer, R.W., Goss, G.G., Hogstrand, C., Janssen, C.R., McGeer, J.C., Naddy, R.B., Playle, R.C., Santore, R.C., Schneider, U., Stubblefield, W.A., Wood, C.M., and Wu, K. (2002) The biotic ligand model for metals — current research, future directions, regulatory implications, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C, 133, 3–35.
Poland, C.A., Duffin, R., Kinloch, I., Maynard, A., Wallace, W.A.H., Seaton, A., Stone, V., Brown, S., MacNee, W., and Donaldson, K. (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos — like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423–428.
Pollard, S.J.T. (2006) Risk Management for the Environmental Practitioner, IEMA Practitioner No. 7, Best practice series, Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment, Lincoln, UK.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008) Novel Materials Study, expected publication date November 2008 (http://www.rcep.org.uk/novelmaterials. htm), last accessed August 4, 2008 (in press).
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. Available online at http://www.nanotec. org.uk/finalReport.htm, last accessed 23 July 2008.
Linkov, I., Satterstrom, K., Steevens, J., Ferguson, E., and Pleus, R. 2007. Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials, Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9, 543–554.
http://es.epa.gov/ncer/nano/publications/nano_strategy_012408.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Owen, R., Crane, M., Grieger, K., Handy, R., Linkov, I., Depledge, M. (2009). Strategic Approaches for the Management of Environmental Risk Uncertainties Posed by Nanomaterials. In: Linkov, I., Steevens, J. (eds) Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9490-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9491-0
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)