Soils from urban environments have a particular pertinence in a forensics context, yet relatively little is known about urban soils compared to those from non-urban regions. Collaboration between universities with forensic science teaching can provide opportunities to develop shared databases for potential use by forensic practitioners, such as the fibre database project hosted by Staffordshire University. The aim of this network project is to broaden the knowledge of soil characterisation and discrimination within the urban environment. In the context of soil evidence, a coordinated network of projects has been established as collaborative ventures across a range of universities and research organisations. A coordinated approach with a high degree of similarity in protocols and quality control between the participating organisations has been established. Between-city and within-city discrimination of common urban land-use vegetation (LUV) classes is being tested. Preliminary results for the parameter of soil colour over one year for sites in Scotland and north-west England are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brown AG, Smith A and Elmhurst O (2002). The combined use of pollen and soil analyses in a search and subsequent murder investigation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:614–618.
Bryant VM, Jones JG and Mildenhall DC (1990). Forensic palynology in the United States of America. Palynology 14:193–208.
Dawson LA, Miller DR and Towers W (2007). Dirty work: New uses for soil databases. http:// vector1media.com/article/feature/dirty-work-new-uses-for-soil-databases/ Accessed 22/07/2008
Dawson LA, Towers W, Mayes RW, Craig J, Vaisanen K and Waterhouse EC (2004). The use of plant hydrocarbon signatures in characterizing soil organic matter. In: Forensic Geoscience: Principles Techniques and Applications (Eds. K Pye and DJ Croft) 232:269–276. The Geological Society of London Special Publications, London.
Dove H and Mayes RW (2006). Protocol for the analysis of n-alkanes and other plant-wax compounds and for their use as markers for quantifying the nutrient supply of large mammalian herbivores. Nature Protocols 1:1680–1697. http://www.natureprotocols.com/2006/11/16/ protocol_for_the_analysis_of_n.php.
Hallett SH, Bullock P and Baillie I. (2006). Towards a world soil survey archive and catalogue. Soil Use and Management 22:227–228.
Hollis JM (1990). The classification of soils in urban areas. In: Soils in the Urban Environment (Eds. P Bullock and PJ Gregory), pp. 5–27. Blackwell Scientific, London.
Horrocks M and Walsh KAJ (1999). Fine resolution of pollen patterns in limited space: Differentiating a crime scene and alibi scene seven meters apart. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44:417–420.
Islam K, McBratney AB and Singh B (2004). Estimation of soil colour from visible reflectance spectra. Supersoil 2004: 3rd Australian New Zealand Soil Conference, University of Sydney, Australia, 5th to 9th December 2004. www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/supersoil2004.
Junger EP (1996). Assessing the unique characteristics of close-proximity soil samples: Just how useful is soil evidence? Journal of Forensic Sciences 41:27–34.
Macaulay Institute (2008a). The SoilFit Project. http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/soilfit/. Accessed 01/07/2008.
Macaulay Institute (2008b). The SoilFun Project. http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/forensics/soilfun/. Accessed 01/07/2008.
Mildenhall DC, Wiltshire PEJ and Bryant VM (2006). Forensic palynology: Why do it and how it works. Forensic Science International 163:163–172.
Milton S (2006). The potential value of fatty acid markers as soil evidence. MSc thesis. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
Rawlins BG, Kemp SJ, Hodgkinson EH, Riding JB, Vane CH, Poulton C and Freeborough K (2006). Potential pitfalls in establishing the provenance of earth-related samples in forensic investigations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:832–845.
Ruffell A and Mckinley J (2005). Forensic geoscience: Applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth-Science Reviews 69:235–247.
Ruffell A and Wiltshire P (2004). Conjunctive use of quantitative and qualitative X-ray diffraction analysis of soils and rocks for forensic analysis. Forensic Science International 145:13–23.
Sanchez-Maranon M, Huertas R and Melgosa M (2005). Colour Variation in standard soil-colour charts. Australian Journal of Soil Research 43:827–837.
Staffordshire University (2008). The Production of National Trace Evidence Databases. http:// www.staffs.ac.uk/faculties/sciences/research/forensic_science/#production. Accessed 01/07/2008.
Viscara Rossel R AV, Minasny B, Roudier P and McBratney AB (2006). Colour space models for soil science. Geoderma 133:320–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morrisson, A.R., McColl, S.M., Dawson, L.A., Brewer, M.J. (2009). Characterisation and Discrimination of Urban Soils: Preliminary Results from the Soil Forensics University Network. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9203-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9204-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)