This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, R. M. 1994. Leibniz. Determinist, Idealist, Theist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Augustine. 1953. Confessions. Transl. V.J. Bourke. In The Fathers of the Church, Vol. 21. New York: Fathers of the Church, Inc.
Baruzi, J. 1907. Leibniz et l’organisation religieuse de la terre. Paris: Félix Alcan.
Castellio, S. 1981. De arte dubitendi et confitendi, ignorandi et sciendi. Leiden: Brill.
Dascal, M. 1993. One Adam and many cultures: The role of political pluralism in the best of possible worlds. In M. Dascal and E. Yakira (eds.), Lebniz and Adam. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects, pp. 387–409.
Dascal, M. 2001. Nihil sine ratione ⇔ Blandior ratio. In H. Poser (ed.), Nihil sine ratione (VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Vorträge), vol. 1. Berlin: Leibniz Gesellschaft, pp. 276–280.
Dascal, M. 2005. The balance of reason. In D. Vanderveken (ed.), Logic, Thought and Action. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 27–47.
Erasmus. 1992. De amabili concordia ecclesiae. In C. Blum, A. Godin, J.-C. Margolin, and D. Ménager (eds.), Erasme. Paris: Robert Laffont.
Grotius, H. 1991. Meletius. In J. Lagrée, La raison ardente. Paris: Vrin.
Laerke, M. 2004. Entre l’enthousiasme et le naturalisme: stratégies argumentatives dans la conceptualisation leibnizienne des mystéres. Paper presented at the International Conference Les enjeux du rationalisme moderne: Descartes, Locke, Leibniz, Carthage.
Laerke, M. Forthcoming. The Golden Rule: Charitas Prudentia. Aspects of Leibniz’s method for religious controversy. In M. Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and his Controversies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lagrée, J. 1991. La raison ardente. Paris: Vrin.
Robinet, A. 1994. G. W. Leibniz. Le meilleur des mondes par la balance de l’Europe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Spinoza, B. 1999. Traité théologico-politique. Ed. F. Akkerman, J. Lagrée, and P.-F. Moreau. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laerke, M. (2008). Apology for a Credo Maximum: On Three Basic Rules in Leibniz’s Method of Religious Controversy. In: Dascal, M. (eds) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8667-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8668-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)