This article discusses the distinctive contributions that the discipline of anthropology (in particular, socio-cultural anthropology) might make to the study of nanotechnology. It focuses on recent research conducted by anthropologists on the subject of nanotechnology, human health and the environment at the Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (CBEN) at Rice University. The chapter plays on the chemical concept of “allotropes” as a way of understanding three variations on the method of anthropological fieldwork. These allotropes of fieldwork include a focus on site, in this case CBEN; a focus on method, especially the role of observations, particip?tion and objectivity; and a focus on substance, the subject matter of nano-science and technology, in this case water and its Relationship?to nano-materials. The argument of the paper is that all of these are necessary for effective ethnographic work and they can focus attention on the human practices that shape research, concepts and results in nanotechnology. It further argues that such practices go unnoticed, or are deliberately downplayed, by some nano-scientists and engineers, and so the contribution of anthropology can be to highlight certain critical projects or p?tential alternative futures not otherwise visible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baum, R. (2003). Drexler and Smalley Make the Case For and Against ‘Molecular Assemblers’.Chemical and Engineering News, 81(48), 37–42, available at http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8148/8148counterpoint.html
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Trans. Mark Ritter. London: Sage.
Beck, U., A. Giddens, & S. Lash (1994). Reflexive Modernization — Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverley Hills, CA/London: Sage. [Second Edition, with a new Afterword, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.]
Colvin, V. (2003). The p?tential Environmental Impact of Engineered Nanomaterials. Nature Biotech, 21(10), 1166–1170.
Drexler, K. E. (2004). Feynman to Funding. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(21),21–27.
Dupuy, J.-P. (2004a). L'irréalité de l'avenir et l'impuissance de l'éthique. Cas des nanotechnolo-gies. In G. Nivat (éd.), Les limites de l'humain. 39èmes Rencontres Internationales de Genève,L'Age d'Homme, Genéve, pp. 115–138.
Dupuy, J.-P. (2004b). Pour une évaluation normative du programme nanotechnologique. Annalesdes Mines (February 2004), 27–32.
Etzkowitz, H. & L. Leydesdorff (1995). Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279–286.
Etzkowitz, H. & L. Leydesdorff (eds.) (1996). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy:A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Book of Abstracts. Amsterdam:University of Amsterdam, 169 pp.
Fleck, L. (1981). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gibbons, P., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scott (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gupta, A. & J. Ferguson (1997). Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Gupta, A. & J. Ferguson (2002). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Holmes, D. & G. Marcus (2005). Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalization:Toward the Re-Functioning of Ethnography, in A. Ong & S. J. Collier (eds.), global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics As Anthropological Problems. Oxford:Blackwell, pp. 235–252.
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004). The Idiom of Co-Production. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge: London.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Khushf, G. (2004). A Hierarchical Architecture for Nano-scale Science and Technology: Taking Stock of the Claims About Science Made by Advocates of NBIC Convergence. In D. Baird, A. Nordmann,& J. Schummer (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 21–33.
Lash, S. & J. Urry (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage. lotour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. lotour, B. & S. Woolgar (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles, CA/London: Sage.
lotour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. lotour, B. & S. Woolgar (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles, CA/London: Sage.
lotour, B. & S. Woolgar (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles, CA/London: Sage.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion, in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mannheim, K. (1955). Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the SOCIOLOGY (740) of Knowledge. New York: Harvest Books.
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Marcus, G. & M. Fischer (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. & M. Fischer (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, et al. (2001). Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Osborne, T. (2004). On Mediators: Intellectuals and the Ideas Trade in the Knowledge Society. Economy and Society, 33(4) (November): 430–447.
Pickering, A. (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press. Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Regis, E. (1996). Nano: The Emerging Science of Nanotechnology. Boston, MA: Back Bay Books.
Shapin, S. & S. Schaffer (1989). Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stone, J. (n.d.) Anthropology and the Human Dimensions of Nanotechnology. … Manuscript, presented at the (2005). American Anthropological Association, on file with author.
Sturgis, P. & N. Allum (2004) Science in Society: Re-evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74.
Toumey, C. (2005). Apostolic Succession. Engineering and Science, 68(1, 2), 16–23, available at pr.caltech.edu/periodicals/EandS/articles/LXVIII1_2/Feynman.pdf
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Paperback edition published in 1992 and reprinted in 1995.
Weber, M. (2004). The Vocation Lectures: Science as a Vocation, Politics as a Vocation. Edited and with introduction by D. Owen and T.B. Strong Tr. R. Livingstone. Indianapolis, IN:Hackett publishing [1917].
Wiesner, M., with M. M. Cortalezzi, J. Rose, G. F. Wells, J. Y. Bottero, A. R. Barron (2003). “Ceramic Membranes Derived from Ferroxane Nanoparticles: A New Route for the Fabrication of Iron Oxide Ultrafiltration Membranes.” Membrane Science, 227, 207–217.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelty, C. (2008). Allotropes of Fieldwork in Nanotechnology. In: Jotterand, F. (eds) Emerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in Bionanotechnology. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 101. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8649-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8649-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8648-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8649-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)