Abstract
In this article, we draw attention to the fact that what English expresses by the use of the weak necessity modal ought, many other languages express by combining a strong necessity modal with the morphology that appears in the consequent of a counterfactual conditional. On the hypothesis that there should be a compositional form-to-meaning mapping, we explore the semantics of weak necessity modals and propose how to derive this semantics from the combination of a strong necessity modal and counterfactual marking. Specifically, building on the semantics for weak necessity modals proposed by Sloman, we propose that weak necessity modals are the result of the promotion of a secondary ordering source of a strong necessity modal. This meta-linguistic operation is signaled or effected by counterfactual marking. The fact that it is a strong necessity modal that is counterfactually marked crosslinguistically, shows that even with weak necessity modals the quantificational force is universal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D., and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago University Press.
Copley, B. (2006). What should Should mean? Ms of a paper given at the Workshop “Language under Uncertainty: Modals, Evidentials, and Conditionals”, Kyoto University, January 2005.
Finlay, S. (2006). (In Order That. . . ) Ought. ms, USC.
von Fintel, K. (1999). The presupposition of subjunctive conditionals. In Sauerland, U. and Percus, O., editors, The Interpretive Tract, number 25 in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pages 29-44. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA.
von Fintel, K. and Gillies, A. S. (2007). An opinionated guide to epistemic modality. ms, MIT and University of Michigan, to appear in Tamar Gendler Szab ó and John Hawthorne (eds.) Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol.2, Oxford University Press.
von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S. (2005). What to do if you want to go to Harlem: Anankastic conditionals and related matters. ms, MIT.
Frank, A. (1996). Context Dependence in Modal Constructions. Ph.D. thesis, Universit ät Stuttgart.
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the Semantic Properties of the Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA, CA.
Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2):231-270.
Jones, A. J. and P örn, I. (1986). Ought and Must. Synthese, 66(1):89-93.
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In Eikmeyer, H. J. and Rieser, H., editors, Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, pages 38-74, Berlin. de Gruyter.
Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D., editors, Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pages 639-650, Berlin. de Gruyter.
McNamara, P. (1996). Must I do what I ought? (or will the least I can do do?). In Brown, M. A. and Carmo, J., editors, Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems - DEON’96: Third International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Sesimbra, Portugal, 11-13 January 1996, Workshops in Computing, pages 154-173. Springer, Berlin.
McNamara, P. (2006). Deontic logic. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sloman, A. (1970). Ought and Better. Mind, 79(315):385-394.
von Stechow, A., Krasikova, S., and Penka, D. (2006). Anankastic conditionals again. In Solstad, T., Grønn, A., and Haug, D., editors, A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø - In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Celebration of his 50th Birthday, pages 151-171. Oslo.
Wertheimer, R. (1972). The Significance of Sense: Meaning, Modality, and Morality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Fintel, K., Iatridou, S. (2008). How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals. In: Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds) Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8353-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8354-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)