Abstract
The purpose of functional tolerancing process is to define the geometrical specifications(tolerances) of parts ensuring functional requirements. An important distinction in tolerance process is that engineers are more commonly faced with the problem of tolerance synthesis rather than tolerance analysis. In tolerance analysis the parts tolerances are all known and the resulting geometrical requirement respect is calculated. In tolerance synthesis, on the other hand, the geometrical requirement is known from design requirements, whereas the magnitudes of the parts tolerances to meet these requirements are unknown. In this paper, we focus on the gear tolerances, and we propose an approach based statistical analysis for tolerance analysis and genetic algorithm for tolerance synthesis. Usually, statistical tolerance analysis uses a relationship between parts deviations and functional characteristics. In the case of tolerance analysis of gears, thus relationship is not available in analytic form, the determination of a functional characteristic(e.g. kinematic error) involves a numerical simulation. Therefore the Monte Carlo simulation, as the simplest and effectual method, is introduced into the frame. Moreover, to optimize the tolerance cost, genetic algorithm is improved. Indeed, this optimization problem is so complex that for traditional optimization algorithms it may be difficult or impossible to solve it because the objective function is not available in analytic form. For the evaluation of the fitness of each individual based on Monte Carlo Simulation, the number of samples is the key of precision. By a large number of samples, the precision can be improved, but the computational cost will be increased. In order to reduce the computational cost of this optimization based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Genetic Algorithms, the strategy is to adopt different precision of fitness; different numbers of samples during the optimization procedure are introduced into our algorithms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ballot E., Bourdet P.A., Computation method for the consequences of geometric errors in mechanisms, in Proceedings of CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Toronto, Canada, April 1997.
Bruyere J., Dantan J.Y., Bigot R., Martin P., Statictical tolerance analysis of gears, in Proceedings of CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Phoenix, USA, 2005.
Chase K.W., Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection, Manufacturing Review 3(1), March 1990, 49–59.
Dantan J.Y., Etienne A., Wu, F., Siadat A., Martin P., Allocation des tolérances fonctionnelles par optimisation du coût de fabrication, Journée AI2P Tolérancement, ENS Cachan, France, 2005.
Godet J.-C.Raffy M., Le calcul des engrenages coniques droits à développante de cercle sphérique, Société d’Etude de l’Industrie de l’Engrenage 53, 1967.
Goldberg D., Genetic Algorithms, Addison Wesley, 1989.
Iannuzzi M.P., Sandgren E., Tolerance optimization using genetic algorithms: Benchmarking with manual analysis, in Proceedings of the Fourth CIRP Design Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, 1995.
Kanai S., Onozuka M., Takahashi H., Optimal tolerance synthesis by genetic algorithm under the machining and assembling constraints, in Proceedings of the Fourth CIRP Design Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, 1995.
Lee J., Johnson G.E., Optimal tolerance allotment using a genetic algorithm and truncated Monte Carlo simulation, J. Computer Aided Design 25, 1995, 601–611.
Litvin F.L., Gear Geometry and Applied Theory, PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2004.
Litvin F.L., De Donno M., Peng A., Vorontsov A., Handschuh R.F., Integrated computer program for simulation of meshing and contact of gear drives, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 181(1–3), 2000, 71–85.
Litvin F.L., Theory of gearing, NASA RP-1212, Washington DC, 1989.
Nigam S.D., Turner J.U., Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis, J. Computer Aided Design 27(1), 1995, 6–15.
Roy U., Li B., Representation and interpretation of geometric tolerances for polyhedral objects, J. Computer Aided Design 31(4), 1999, 273–285.
Sacks E., Joskowicz L., Parametric kinematic tolerance analysis of planar mechanisms, J. Computer Aided Design 29(5), 1997, 333–342.
Samper S., Petit J.P., Giordano M., Elastic clearance domain and use rate concept applications to ball bearing and gears, in Proceedings of CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, USA, April 2005.
Shan A., Roth R.N., Genetic algorithms in statistical tolerancing, J. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 38, 2003, 1427–1436.
Skowronski V.J., Turner J.U., Using Monte Carlo variance reduction in statistical tolerance synthesis, J. Computer-Aided Design 29(1), 1997, 63–69.
Zou Z., Morse E.P., A gap-based approach to capture fitting conditions for mechanical assembly, J. Computer Aided Design 36, 2004, 691–700.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruyere, J., Dantan, JY., Wu, F., Bigot, R. (2007). Optimization of Gear Tolerances by Statistical Analysis and Genetic Algorithm. In: Tichkiewitch, S., Tollenaere, M., Ray, P. (eds) Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6760-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6761-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)