Skip to main content

The potential for biological control of invasive alien aquatic weeds in Europe: a review

  • Chapter
Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 190))

Abstract

A retrospective analysis shows that invasive, alien, free-floating and emergent aquatic weeds in Europe are good targets for classical biological control, and that genus-specific chrysomelid and curculionid beetles offer the most potential. Ludwigia spp., Azolla filiculoides, Lemna minuta, Crassula helmsii and Hydrocotyle ranunculoides should be prioritised as targets. Fungal pathogens have been under-utilised as classical agents but, whilst they may have some potential against free-floating weeds, they appear to be poor candidates against submerged species, although the suitability of arthropod agents against these difficult targets still merits investigation. The use of indigenous pathogens as inundative agents (mycoherbicides) shows some promise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blossey, B., R. Casagrande, L. Tewsksbury, D. A. Landis, R. N. Wiedenmann & D. R. Ellis, 2001. Non-target feeding of leaf-beetles introduced to control purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Natural Areas Journal 21: 368–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, G. R., 1989. Lemnaphila scotlandae (Diptera: Ephydridae) and three of its parasites discovered in Florida. Florida Entomologist 72: 219–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, C. J., 1999. Biological control of parrot’s feather, Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. (Haloragaceae), in South Africa. In Olckers T. & M. P. Hill (eds), Biological Control of Weeds in South Africa (1990–1998). African Entomology Memoir 1: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordo, H. A., C. J. DeLoach & R. Ferrer, 1982. The weevils Lixellus, Tanysphiroideus, and Cyrtobagous that feed on Hydrocotyle and Salvinia in Argentina. Coleopterists Bulletin 36: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J., 1989. The successes and failures of weed biocontrol using insects. Biocontrol News and Information 10: 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, R. P. & S. P. Sheldon, 1995. Weevils and watermilfoil: did a North American herbivore cause the decline of an exotic plant?. Ecological Applications 5: 1113–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. C. & R. H. Reeder, 2000. Fungi associated with Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) in the upper Amazon basin and prospects for their use in biological control. In Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (2001). Proceedings of the Global Working Group for the Biological Control and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Beijing, China. ACIAR Proceedings No. 102: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. C., M. P. Greaves & A. K. Watson, 2001. Fungal biocontrol agents of weeds. In Butt, T. M., C. W. Jackson & N. Magan (eds), Fungi as Biocontrol Agents. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forno, I. W. & M. H. Julien, 2000. Success in biological control of aquatic weeds by arthropods. In Gurr, G. & S. Wratten (eds), Biological Control: Measures of Success. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, A., 1995. Europe as a source of biological control agents of exotic invasive weeds: status and implications. Bulletin de la sociétéentomologique Suisse 68: 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goettel, M. S., A. E. Hajek, J. P. Siegel & H. C. Evans, 2001. Safety of fungal biocontrol agents. In Butt, T. M., C. W. Jackson & N. Magan (eds), Fungi as Biocontrol Agents. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 347–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., 1991. Classical biocontrol of weeds: its definition, selection of effective agents, and administrative-political problems. Canadian Entomologist 123: 827–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. L. & D. R. Varley, 1996. Evaluation of European pathogens for the control of Myriophyllum spicatum in the USA. In Moran, V. C. & J. H. Hoffman (eds), Proceedings of the IXth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. University of Cape Town, South Africa, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. P., 1999. Biological control of red water fern, Azolla filiculoides Lamarck (Pteridophyta: Azollaceae), in South Africa. In Olckers, T. & M. P. Hill (eds), Biological Control of Weeds in South Africa (1990–1998). African Entomology Memoir 1: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. P. & C. J. Cilliers, 1999. A review of the arthropod natural enemies, and factors that influence their efficacy, in the biological control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms-Laubach (Pontederiaceae), in South Africa. In Olckers, T. & M. P. Hill (eds), Biological Control of Weeds in South Africa (1990–1998). African Entomology Memoir 1: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, R. A., 1995. The biology and control of Azolla filiculoides and Lemna minuta. PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M. H. 2001. Biological control of water hyacinth with arthropods: a review to 2000. In Julien, M.H., M.P. Hill, T. D. Center & Ding Jianqing (eds), Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crasssipes. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Global Working Group for the Biological and Integrated control of Water hyacinth, Beijing, China, 9–12 October 2000. ACIAR Proceedings 102: 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. H., 1990. Biological control of plants: a review of generalisations, rules, and principles using insects as agents. In Bassett, C., L. J. Whitehouse & J. A. Zabkiewicz (eds), Alternatives to the chemical control of weeds. Proc. of an Int. Conf., Rotorua, New Zealand, July 1989. Ministry of Forestry, FRI Bulletin 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marohasy, J., 1996. Host shifts in biological weed control: real problems, semantic difficulties or poor science?. International Journal of Pest Management 42: 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, M. A., D. R. Bayne, J. G. Steeger, E. C. Webber & E. Reutebuch, 1996. The potential for biological control of water primrose (Ludwigia grandiflora) by the water primrose flea beetle (Lyathia ludoviciana) in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 34: 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, R. E. C., 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 369–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Napompeth, B., 1990. Country Report: Thailand. Biological control of weeds in Thailand. Biotrop Special Publication 38: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. M., M. E. Borman & S. W. Castro, 1997. Developmental performance of the weevil Euhrychiopsis lecontei on native and exotic watermilfoil host plants. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, R. W., 2000. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control. Oecologia 125: 489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, J., 1998. Biological control of Hydrilla using an endemic fungal pathogen. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 36: 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (eds), 1964. Flora Europaea, I-V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, U. & R. Charrudattan, 1993. Host range of Mycoleptodiscus terrestris, a microbial herbicide candidate for Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum. Biological Control 3: 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere, A. J., 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology 77: 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere, A. J., 1985. Effectiveness of biological control agents for weeds: present quandries. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 13: 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gassmann, A., Cock, M.J.W., Shaw, R., Evans, H.C. (2006). The potential for biological control of invasive alien aquatic weeds in Europe: a review. In: Caffrey, J.M., Dutartre, A., Haury, J., Murphy, K.J., Wade, P.M. (eds) Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 190. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5390-0_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics