Skip to main content

Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 3))

Abstract

Domestic gardens associated with residential zones form a major component of vegetated land in towns and cities. Such gardens may play a vital role in maintaining biodiversity in urban areas, but variation in the abundance of organisms in gardens has been little explored. We report the results from a case study of 61 domestic gardens in the city of Sheffield, UK. Across 22 invertebrate groups, the median number of individuals recorded per garden was 49, 178, and 1012 in litter collections, pitfall and Malaise trap samples, respectively. Abundance was analysed by stepwise multiple regression and hierarchical tree analysis in relation to garden and landscape variables. The amount of variation explained in regression models ranged from 4 to 56%, for data based on pitfall and litter samples, and from 16 to 92% for data from Malaise traps. In total, 31 out of 36 explanatory variables entered into stepwise regression models, and 29 of them did so more than once. Although there was strong evidence only for approximately half of such relationships, in these cases the two methods of analysis corroborated one another. General correlates of invertebrate abundance were lacking, and likely reasons for inconsistencies in the relationships are discussed in the context of sampling and species biology. Correlates of the greatest significance occurred at both landscape (e.g. altitude) and garden scales (e.g. area of canopy vegetation). These factors were associated with species richness as well as abundance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen A.A. 1964. The Coleoptera of a suburban garden. Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation 76: 261–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey S.E.R., North M.C. and Cook L.M. 1998. Slugs and snails and thrushes’ anvils: children’s surveys of slugs and snails. Journal of Conchology Special Publication 2: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair R.B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6: 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair R.B. and Launer A.E. 1997. Butterfly assemblages and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon A. 1999. The significance of private gardens for bird conservation. Bird Conservation International 9: 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon A. 2000. Garden BirdWatch Handbook, 2nd edn. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J. 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley and sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B.N.K. 1978. Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. In: Mound L.A. and Waloff N. (eds), Diversity of Insect Faunas. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, pp. 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denys C. and Schmidt H. 1998. Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient. Oecologia 113: 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C.R. and Doncaster C.P. 1987. The ecology of small mammals in urban habitats. I. Populations in a patchy environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N. and Qasim 2000. HortTechnology 10: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversham B.C., Roy D.B. and Telfer M.G. 1996. Urban, industrial and other manmade sites as analogues of natural habitats for Carabidae. Annals Zoologica Fennici 33: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M., Greenwood J.J.D., Gregory R.D., Quinn R.M. and Lawton J.H. 2000. Abundance-occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Smith R.M., Thompson K. and Warren P.H. 2005. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Warren P.H., Thompson K. and Smith R.M. in press. Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine S.S. and Wakeling B.F. 2001. Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biological Conservation 97: 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb H. and Hochuli D.F. 2002. Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation 106: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert O.L. 1990. The lichen flora of urban wasteland. Lichenologist 22: 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R. and Gentleman R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig A.P. and Grove J.M. 2001. Urban-suburban ecology. In: Levin S.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Vol. 5. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R. and Luck G.W. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421: 530–533.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M., Naeem S. and Inchausti P. (eds) 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin D. and Tate N. 1997. Surpop V2.0: Introduction. http://census.ac.uk/cdu/surpop.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch M.A. and Chown S.L. 1997. Impact of urbanization on a gall-inhabiting Lepidoptera assemblage: the importance of reserves in urban areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 979–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miotk P. 1996. The naturalized garden — a refuge for animals? — first results Zoologischer Anzeiger 235: 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita T., Shinkai A. and Chida T. 1998. The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas. Biological Conservation 86: 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran M.D. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100: 403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen J. 1991. The Ecology of a Garden: the First Fifteen Years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P. 1993. Factors affecting the diversity of flora and vegetation in central European settlements. Vegetatio 106: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy D.B., Hill M.O. and Rothery P. 1999. Effects of urban land cover on the local species pool in Britain. Ecography 22: 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saville B. 1997. The Secret Garden: Report of the Lothian Secret Garden Survey. Lothian Wildlife Information Centre, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. 1989. Butterflies and moths in suburbia. Nature in Cambridgeshire 31: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.M., Gaston K.J., Warren P.H. and Thompson K. in press. Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape Ecology 20(2): 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.M., Warren P.H., Thompson K. and Gaston K.J. in press. Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M.E., Bolger D.T., Alberts A.C., Wright J., Sorice M. and Hill S. 1988. Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology 2: 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stace C. 1997. New Flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H. and Starfinger U. 1999. Disturbance in Urban Ecosystems. Ecosystems of the World 16. In: Walker L.R. (ed.), Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K., Austin K.C., Smith R.M., Warren P.H., Angold P. and Gaston K.J. 2003. Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K., Hodgson J.G., Smith R.M., Warren P.H. and Gaston K.J. 2004. Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K. and Jones A. 1999. Human population density and prediction of local plant extinction in Britain. Conservation Biology 13: 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank and World Resources Institute 2000. World Resources 2000–2001: People and Ecosystems — the fraying web of life. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery M.L. 1995. Gardens: the neglected habitat. In: Pullin A.S. (ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright M. 1984. The Complete Handbook of Garden Plants. Michael Joseph, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, R.M., Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H., Thompson, K. (2006). Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5283-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics