Abstract
Regulators, enforcers, and policy implementers involved in environment protection need help to do their work. That help comes from many places. Very rarely is there sufficient resource in environmental regulatory agencies, in terms of staff, material, toolkits, empowerment, or the capital to do the job they or their critics see as necessary. There are many sources of help. They include but are not limited to other regulators, parallel or partner organisations and individuals, including governments, national and local, ‘peak’1 trade or industry bodies, specialist non-governmental organisations (NGOs), academics, and management consultants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, C.A. (2004), ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting-performance Portrayal Gap’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757.
Adams, C.A. and Frost, G. (2007), ‘Managing Social and Environmental Performance: Do Companies Have Adequate Information?’, Australian Accounting Review, 17(3), 2–11.
Bismark, M. (2014), The Seven Qualities of Highly Effective Regulators (blog post). Availableathttp://mariebismark.com/2014/12/01/the-seven-qualities-of-highly-effective-regulators/
Daniels, S.E. and Walker, G.B. (2001), Working through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Eccles, R.G. (1991), ‘The Performance Management Manifesto’, in Measuring Corporate Performance, Harvard Business Review. Jan-Feb 69(1): 131–137. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
Emison, G.A. and Morris, J.C. (2012), True Green. Lexington, Plymouth: Lexington Books.
EPANet (NHEEPA) (2005), The Contribution of Good Environmental Regulation to Competitiveness, aka ‘The Prague Statement’. Available at http://epanet.pbe.eea.europa.eu/fol249409/our-publications/prague-statement-folder/ PragueStatement_1.pdf
EPANet (NHEEPA)/EEA (2013), The EPA Network — Sharing Experiences Across Europe. Available at http://epanet.ew.eea.europa.eu/fol249409/epa-brochure-final-web. pdf/download
EU Commission (DG Environment) (2011), Impact Assessment Study into Possible Options for Revising Recommendation 2001/331/EC Providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections. Rotterdam: ECORYS. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/law/pdf/Env%20inspections_report.pdf
Farmer, A. (2007), Handbook of Environmental Protection and Enforcement; Principles and Practice. London: Earthscan.
Faure, M., De Smedt, P., and Stas, A. (eds) (2015), Environmental Enforcement Networks: Concepts, Implementation and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Freiberg, A. (2010), The Tools of Regulation. NSW: Federation Press.
Gemmell, C. (2015), Better Regulation, Enforcement and Networking: Co-dependency for the Global Environment (International Conference on Environmental Enforcement Networks Brussels, 13–14 November 2013, VHRM/INECE), in M. Faure, P. De Smedt, and A. Stas (eds), Environmental Enforcement Networks: Concepts, Implementation and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. pp. 37–58.
Gemmell, J.C. and Circelli, T. (2015), ‘Environmental Regulation and Enforcement Networks Operating in Tandem: A Very Effective Vehicle for Driving Efficiencies and Facilitating Knowledge Exchange and Transfer’, in M. Faure, P. De Smedt, and A. Stas (eds), Environmental Enforcement Networks: Concepts, Implementation and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 172–186.
Gemmell, J.C. and Scott, E.M. (2013), ‘Environmental Regulation, Sustainability and Risk’, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(2), 120–144.
Giles, C. (2013), ‘Next Generation Compliance’, Environmental Forum, 30(5), 22–26.
IMPEL (European Union Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law) (n.d.), Cluster i: Improving Implementation of EU Environmental Law (Permitting, Inspection, Enforcement and Smarter Regulation). Available at http://impel.eu/cluster-i/ (accessed 18 February 2014).
IMPEL (2012), Choosing Appropriate Interventions Alongside Inspections to Ensure Compliance and Achieve Environmental Outcomes -Phase 1 Developing Principles and Features of a Model for Choosing Interventions. Available at http://impel.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Final-Report_Choosing-Appropriate-Interventions-_2012-11-19-amended-MN-080713.pdf
Johnson, H.T. and Bröms, A. (2008), Profit beyond Measure. London: Nicholas Brealey.
Liebregts, T.M. and Kramers, R. (2008), ‘Doing the Rights Things: A Step-by-step Guidance for Planning of Environmental Inspections’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, 5–11 April 2008, Cape Town, South Africa. London: Cameron May. pp. 283–287.
Medpartnerships (n.d.). Training Workshop for Environmental Inspectorate and Marine Monitoring in Alexandria, Egypt. Available at http://www.themedpartnership.org/med/pfpublish/p/doc/b7e7bdfbbfec17dc83ef26f265b94a93 (accessed 25 July 2015).
Meuleman, L. and in ‘t Veld, R.J. (2009), Sustainable Development and the Governance of Long-term Decisions. The Hague: EEAC/RMNO nr V17.
Moody-Stuart, M. (2014), Responsible Leadership — Lessons from the Frontline of Sustainability and Ethics. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
OUP (Oxford University Press) (2015), Oxford English Dictionary. Available at http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/consultancy (accessed 18 February 2015).
Pink, G. (2008), ‘Building Regulatory Capacity in Environmental Agencies: Through Tailored Training’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, 5–11 April, Cape Town, South Africa. London: Cameron May, pp. 225–233.
Pink, G. (2015), ‘Environmental Enforcement Networks: Theory, Practice and Potential’, in M. Faure, P. De Smedt, and A. Stas (eds), Environmental Enforcement Networks: Concepts, Implementation and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 13–36.
SA EPA (South Australian Environment Protection Authority) (2013), Becoming a Harms-based Regulator — Developing a Problem-solving Culture. SA EPA: Adelaide. Available at http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/xstd_files/Licensmg/Report/change_harms. pdf (accessed 18 February 2015).
SEPA (Scottish Environment Protection Agency) (2011). Support for changes to SEPA’s new environmental protection regime [Media Release]. Available at http://media.sepa.org.uk/media-releases/2011/support-for-changes-to-sepas-new-environmental-regime/ (accessed 25 July 2015).
SNIFFER (Scotland & Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research) (2009), Targeted Risk Based Approaches to Compliance Assessment, Project UKCC20. Edinburgh: SNIFFER.
SNIFFER (2013), Improving Compliance and Environmental Outcomes in New Ways with Limited Resources: The GEB Framework, Project ER21. Edinburgh: SNIFFER.
Sparrow, M.K. (2000), The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems, and Managing Compliance. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
Sparrow, M.K. (2008), The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Campbell Gemmell, Simon Bingham, and Nancy Isarin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gemmell, C., Bingham, S., Isarin, N. (2016). Collaboration and Consultancy, Tackling Environmental Crime, and Delivering Environment Protection. In: Pink, G., White, R. (eds) Environmental Crime and Collaborative State Intervention. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56257-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56257-9_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55981-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56257-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)