Abstract
Public services are by their nature complex (Moore, 2002), involving a large number of stakeholders. As a result, the number of public sector performance measures can quickly rise in order to reflect this complexity and to be accountable to the various stakeholders. Hood gives an example of the Health Department in England, where ten top-level targets “were translated into some 300 lower-level targets for various public sector health-delivery organizations” (2006: 515). In many countries we have seen a rapid proliferation of policies introducing performance indicators and targets in all areas of the public service sector, from local and central government to education, health and community care.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Zoe Radnor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Radnor, Z. (2008). Hitting the Target and Missing the Point? Developing an Understanding of Organizational Gaming. In: Van Dooren, W., Van de Walle, S. (eds) Performance Information in the Public Sector. Governance and Public Management Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10541-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10541-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30912-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10541-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)