Abstract
Protein interactions are at the essence of life. Proteins evolved not to have stable structures, but rather to be specialized in participating in a network of interactions. Every interaction involving proteins comprises the formation of an encounter complex, which may have two outcomes: (i) the dissociation or (ii) the formation of the final specific complex. Here, we present a methodology to characterize the encounter complex of the Grb2-SH2 domain with a phosphopeptide. This method can be generalized to other protein partners. It consists of the measurement of 15N CPMG relaxation dispersion (RD) profiles of the protein in the free state, which describes the residues that are in conformational exchange. We then acquire the dispersion profiles of the protein at a semisaturated concentration of the ligand. At this condition, the chemical exchange between the free and bound state leads to the observation of dispersion profiles in residues that are not in conformational exchange in the free state. This is due to fuzzy interactions that are typical of the encounter complexes. The transient “touching” of the ligand in the protein partner generates these new relaxation dispersion profiles. For the Grb2-SH2 domain, we observed a wider surface at SH2 for the encounter complex than the phosphopeptide (pY) binding site, which might explain the molecular recognition of remote phosphotyrosine. The Grb2-SH2–pY encounter complex is dominated by electrostatic interactions, which contribute to the fuzziness of the complex, but also have contribution of hydrophobic interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pascal SM, Yamazaki T, Singer AU et al (1995) Structural and dynamic characterization of the phosphotyrosine binding region of a Src homology 2 domain-phosphopeptide complex by NMR relaxation, proton exchange, and chemical shift approaches. Biochemistry 34:11353–11362. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00036a008
Liu BA, Engelmann BW, Nash PD (2012) The language of SH2 domain interactions defines phosphotyrosine-mediated signal transduction. FEBS Lett 586:2597–2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.054
Kessels HWHG, Ward AC, Schumacher TNM (2002) Specificity and affinity motifs for Grb2 SH2-ligand interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8524–8529. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142224499
Zhou S, Shoelson SE, Chaudhuri M et al (1993) SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell 72:767–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90404-E
McNemar C, Snow ME, Windsor WT et al (1997) Thermodynamic and structural analysis of phosphotyrosine polypeptide binding to Grb2-SH2. Biochemistry 36(33):10006–10014. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9704360
Nioche P, Liu WQ, Broutin I et al (2002) Crystal structures of the SH2 domain of Grb2: highlight on the binding of a new high-affinity inhibitor. J Mol Biol 315:1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.5299
Rahuel J, Gay B, Erdmann D et al (1996) Structural basis for specificity of GRB2-SH2 revealed by a novel ligand binding mode. Nat Struct Mol Biol 3:586–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0796-586
Waksman G, Kominos D, Robertson SC et al (1992) Crystal structure of the phosphotyrosine recognition domain SH2 of v-src complexed with tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides. Nature 358:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1038/358646a0
Liu Z, Gong Z, Dong X, Tang C (2016) Transient protein–protein interactions visualized by solution NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta 1864:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.04.009
Sanches K, Caruso IP, Almeida FCL, Melo FA (2020) The dynamics of free and phosphopeptide-bound Grb2-SH2 reveals two dynamically independent subdomains and an encounter complex with fuzzy interactions. Sci Rep 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70034-w
James LC, Tawfik DS (2005) Structure and kinetics of a transient antibody binding intermediate reveal a kinetic discrimination mechanism in antigen recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12730–12735. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500909102
Tang C, Iwahara J, Clore GM (2006) Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Nature 444:383–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05201
Bashir Q, Scanu S, Ubbink M (2011) Dynamics in electron transfer protein complexes. FEBS J 278:1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08062.x
Huang WYC, Ditlev JA, Chiang HK et al (2017) Allosteric modulation of Grb2 recruitment to the intrinsically disordered scaffold protein, LAT, by remote site phosphorylation. J Am Chem Soc 139:18009–18015. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09387
Ross PD, Subramanian S (1981) Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability. Biochemistry 20:3096–3102. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00514a017
Ubbink M (2009) The courtship of proteins: understanding the encounter complex. FEBS Lett 583:1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.02.046
Meiboom S, Gill D (1958) Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 29:688–691. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1716296
Carr HY, Purcell EM (1954) Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 94:630
Loria JP, Rance M, Palmer AG (1999) A relaxation-compensated Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 121:2331–2332
Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2008) An improved 15N relaxation dispersion experiment for the measurement of millisecond time-scale dynamics in proteins. J Phys Chem B 112:5898–5904. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074793o
Yuzawa S, Yokochi M, Hatanaka H et al (2001) Solution structure of Grb2 reveals extensive flexibility necessary for target recognition. J Mol Biol 306:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4396
Wishart DS, Bigama CG, Yao J et al (1995) 13 C and 15 N chemical shift referencing in biomolecular NMR. J Biomol NMR 6:135–140
Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW et al (1995) Nmrpipe – a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293
Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ et al (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59:687–696
Maciejewski MW, Schuyler AD, Gryk MR et al (2017) NMRbox: a resource for biomolecular NMR computation. Biophys J 112:1529–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.011
McConnell HM (1958) Reaction rates by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 28:430–431. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744152
Hansen DF, Led JJ (2003) Implications of using approximate Bloch-McConnell equations in NMR analyses of chemically exchanging systems: application to the electron self-exchange of plastocyanin. J Magn Reson 163:215–227. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1308703/
Morin S, Linnet TE, Lescanne M et al (2014) relax: the analysis of biomolecular kinetics and thermodynamics using NMR relaxation dispersion data. Bioinformatics 30:2219–2220. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTU166
Carver J, Richards R (1972) A general two-site solution for the chemical exchange produced dependence of T2 upon the carr-Purcell pulse separation. J Magn Reson 6:89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(72)90090-X
Davis DG, Perlman ME, London RE (1994) Direct measurements of the dissociation-rate constant for inhibitor-enzyme complexes via the T1ρ and T2 (CPMG) methods. J Magn Reson Ser B 104:266–275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1994.1084
Ban D, Funk M, Gulich R et al (2011) Kinetics of conformational sampling in ubiquitin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:11437–11440. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201105086
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Almeida, F.C.L., Sanches, K., Caruso, I.P., Melo, F.A. (2023). NMR Relaxation Dispersion Experiments to Study Phosphopeptide Recognition by SH2 Domains: The Grb2-SH2–Phosphopeptide Encounter Complex. In: Carlomagno, T., Köhn, M. (eds) SH2 Domains. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2705. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3393-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3393-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3392-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3393-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols