Abstract
Proteomics methods such as affinity purification (AP) and proximity-dependent labeling (PL) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) are currently commonly utilized to define interaction landscapes. BioID is one of the PL approaches, and it employs the expression of bait proteins fused to a nonspecific biotin ligase (BirA*), to induce in vivo biotinylation of proximal proteins. We developed the multiple approaches combined (MAC)-tag workflow, which allows for both AP and BioID analysis with a single construct and with almost identical protein purification and MS identification procedures. MAC-tag is a well-established method and has been widely used. Recent developed PL tags such as BioID2 and UltraID are smaller versions of BirA* with faster labeling efficiency. We therefore incorporate these tags into our system to develop MAC2-tag (containing BioID2) and MAC3-tag (containing UltraID) to overcome potential limitations of the original MAC-tag system and broaden the spectrum of applications for MAC-tags. Here, we describe a detailed procedure for the MAC-tag system workflow including cell line generation for the MAC/MAC2/MAC3-tagged protein of interest (POI), sample preparation for AP and PL protein purification, and MS analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gingras AC, Gstaiger M, Raught B et al (2007) Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(8):645–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2208
Varjosalo M, Sacco R, Stukalov A et al (2013) Interlaboratory reproducibility of large-scale human protein-complex analysis by standardized AP-MS. Nat Methods 10(4):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2400
Hein Marco Y, Hubner Nina C, Poser I et al (2015) A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell 163(3):712–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.053
Bonetta L (2010) Protein-protein interactions: interactome under construction. Nature 468(7325):851–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/468851a
Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M et al (2012) A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 196(6):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201112098
Kim DI, Jensen SC, Noble KA et al (2016) An improved smaller biotin ligase for. BioID Proximity Label 27(8):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0844
Liu X, Huuskonen S, Laitinen T et al (2021) SARS-CoV-2-host proteome interactions for antiviral drug discovery. Mol Syst Biol 17(11):e10396. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110396
Liu X, Salokas K, Tamene F et al (2018) An AP-MS- and BioID-compatible MAC-tag enables comprehensive mapping of protein interactions and subcellular localizations. Nat Commun 9(1):1188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03523-2
Salokas K, Liu X, Öhman T et al (2022) Physical and functional interactome atlas of human receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO Report, p e54041. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202154041
Göös H, Kinnunen M, Salokas K et al (2022) Human transcription factor protein interaction networks. Nat Commun 13(1):766. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28341-5
Chojnowski A, Sobota RM, Ong PF et al (2018) 2C-BioID: an advanced two component BioID system for precision mapping of protein interactomes. iScience 10:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.11.023
Trinkle-Mulcahy L (2019) Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping. F1000Research 8. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16903.1
Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD et al (2018) Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat Biotechnol 36(9):880–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4201
Zhao X, Bitsch S, Kubitz L et al (2021) ultraID: a compact and efficient enzyme for proximity-dependent biotinylation in living cells. J bioRxiv. 2021.2006.2016.448656. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.16.448656
Varjosalo M, Keskitalo S, Van Drogen A et al (2013) The protein interaction landscape of the human CMGC kinase group. Cell Rep 3(4):1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.027
Wee P, Wang Z (2017) Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways. Cancers (Basel) 9(5):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9050052
Vecchi M, Rudolph-Owen LA, Brown CL et al (1998) Tyrosine phosphorylation and proteolysis. Pervanadate-induced, metalloprotease-dependent cleavage of the ErbB-4 receptor and amphiregulin. J Biol Chem 273(32):20589–20595. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.32.20589
Bennett PA, Dixon RJ, Kellie S (1993) The phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadyl hydroperoxide induces morphological alterations, cytoskeletal rearrangements and increased adhesiveness in rat neutrophil leucocytes. J Cell Sci 106(Pt 3):891–901. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.106.3.891
Hietamäki J, Gregory LC, Ayoub S et al (2020) Loss-of-function variants in TBC1D32 underlie syndromic hypopituitarism. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 105(6):1748–1758. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa078
Yellapragada V, Liu X, Lund C et al (2019) MKRN3 interacts with several proteins implicated in puberty timing but does not influence GNRH1 expression. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00048
Liu X, Salokas K, Weldatsadik RG et al (2020) Combined proximity labeling and affinity purification−mass spectrometry workflow for mapping and visualizing protein interaction networks. Nat Protoc 15(10):3182–3211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0365-x
Meier F, Brunner A-D, Frank M et al (2020) diaPASEF: parallel accumulation–serial fragmentation combined with data-independent acquisition. Nat Methods 17(12):1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-00998-0
Skowronek P, Meier F (2022) High-throughput mass spectrometry-based proteomics with dia-PASEF. Methodmol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2456:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2124-0_2
Orsburn BC (2021) Proteome discoverer – a community enhanced data processing suite for protein informatics. Proteomes 9(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes9010015
Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J (2016) The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc 11(12):2301–2319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.136
Kong AT, Leprevost FV, Avtonomov DM et al (2017) MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry–based proteomics. Nat Methods 14(5):513–520. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4256
Choi H, Larsen B, Lin ZY et al (2011) SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods 8(1):70–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1541
Acknowledgments
We thank all members of the Varjosalo laboratory (https://www2.helsinki.fi/en/researchgroups/molecular-systems-biology), especially Tanja Turunen and Antti Tuhkala for optimization of the protocol. This work is funded by grants from the Academy of Finland (nos. 288475 and 294173), the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, Biocentrum Finland, HiLIFE, and POLS (Norway Grants, no. 2020/37 / K / NZ4 / 02761).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Liu, X., Salokas, K., Keskitalo, S., Martínez-Botía, P., Varjosalo, M. (2023). Analyzing Protein Interactions by MAC-Tag Approaches. In: Mukhtar, S. (eds) Protein-Protein Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2690. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3327-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3327-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3326-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3327-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols