Skip to main content

Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Elements of Adaptive Testing

Part of the book series: Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences ((SSBS))

Abstract

The intuitive principle underlying adaptive testing is that a test has better measurement properties if the difficulties of its items match the ability of the examinee. Items that are too easy or difficult have predictable responses and cannot provide much information about the ability of the examinee. The first to formalize this principle was Birnbaum (1968). The information measure he used was Fisher’s well-known information in the sample. For dichotomous response models, the measure is defined as

$$I(\theta) = \sum\limits^n_{i=1} I_i(\theta)= \sum\limits^n_{i=1}\frac{(P^\prime(\theta))^2}{P(\theta)[1 - P(\theta)]},$$
(2.1)

where P i (θ) is the probability of a correct response to item i = 1, …, n for an examinee with ability θ, I i (θ) is the information in the examinee’s response to item i, and I(θ) is the information in his or her joint responses to the test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-stage tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, R. D. & Jones, D. H. (1992). Polynomial algorithms for item matching. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-H. & van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in alpha-stratified adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262–274.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. & Ying, Z. (1999). α-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-H. & Ying, Z. (2009). Nonlinear sequential designs for logistic item response models with applications to computerized adaptive tests. Annals of Statistics, 37, 1466–1488.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. & Chang, H.-H. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Chang, H.-H. & Yi, Q. (2007). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 467–482.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, M. J. (1997). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S. (1996). A course in large-sample theory. London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glas, C. A. W., Wainer, H. & Bradlow, E. T. (2000). MML and EAP estimation in testlet-based adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 271–287). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetter, R. D. & Sympson, J. B. (1997). Item exposure in CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters & J. R. McBride (Eds.),Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ILOG, Inc. (2003). CPLEX 9.0 [Computer Program and Manual]. Incline Village, NV: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, G. G. & Zara, A. R. (1991). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecht, R. D. (1988). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luecht, R. M. & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 81–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163–182). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. & Stocking, M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sympson, J. B. & Hetter, R. D. (1985, October). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973–977). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (1999). A procedure for empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Optimal assembly of tests with item sets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2001a). Adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2001b). On complexity in computer-based testing. In G. N. Mills, M. Potenza, J. J. Fremer & W. Ward (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2005a). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2005b). Linear models for optimal test design. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2006). A lognormal model for response times on test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2009a). Predictive control of speededness in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (2009b). Local observed-score equating. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for equating, scaling, and linking. New York: Springer-Verlag. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Adema, J. J. (1998). Simultaneous assembly of multiple test forms. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 185–198 [Addendum in Vol. 36, 90–91].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Chang, H.-H. (2003). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Luecht, R. M. (1998). Observed equating as a test assembly problem. Psychometrika, 62, 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Reese, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Veldkamp, B. P. (2007). Conditional item-exposure control in adaptive testing using item-ineligibility probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp, B. P. & van der Linden, W. J. (2008). A multiple-shadow-test approach to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing, 8, 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T. & Du, Z. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 245–269). Boston: Kluwer-Nijh of Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T. & Wang, X. (2007). Testlet response theory and its applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters in computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Linden, W.J. (2009). Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests. In: van der Linden, W., Glas, C. (eds) Elements of Adaptive Testing. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics