Abstract
The intuitive principle underlying adaptive testing is that a test has better measurement properties if the difficulties of its items match the ability of the examinee. Items that are too easy or difficult have predictable responses and cannot provide much information about the ability of the examinee. The first to formalize this principle was Birnbaum (1968). The information measure he used was Fisher’s well-known information in the sample. For dichotomous response models, the measure is defined as
where P i (θ) is the probability of a correct response to item i = 1, …, n for an examinee with ability θ, I i (θ) is the information in the examinee’s response to item i, and I(θ) is the information in his or her joint responses to the test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adema, J. J. (1990). The construction of customized two-stage tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 241–253.
Armstrong, R. D. & Jones, D. H. (1992). Polynomial algorithms for item matching. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 271–288.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chang, H.-H. & van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in alpha-stratified adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262–274.
Chang, H. & Ying, Z. (1999). α-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211–222.
Chang, H.-H. & Ying, Z. (2009). Nonlinear sequential designs for logistic item response models with applications to computerized adaptive tests. Annals of Statistics, 37, 1466–1488.
Cheng, Y. & Chang, H.-H. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369–383.
Cheng, Y., Chang, H.-H. & Yi, Q. (2007). Two-phase item selection procedure for flexible content balancing in CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 467–482.
Cordova, M. J. (1997). Optimization methods in computerized adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Ferguson, T. S. (1996). A course in large-sample theory. London: Chapman & Hall.
Glas, C. A. W., Wainer, H. & Bradlow, E. T. (2000). MML and EAP estimation in testlet-based adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 271–287). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof Publishing.
Hetter, R. D. & Sympson, J. B. (1997). Item exposure in CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters & J. R. McBride (Eds.),Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
ILOG, Inc. (2003). CPLEX 9.0 [Computer Program and Manual]. Incline Village, NV: Author.
Kingsbury, G. G. & Zara, A. R. (1991). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359–375.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Luecht, R. D. (1988). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224–236.
Luecht, R. M. & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229–249.
Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 81–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57–75.
Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In W. J. van der Linden and C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 163–182). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof Publishing.
Swanson, L. & Stocking, M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151–166.
Sympson, J. B. & Hetter, R. D. (1985, October). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973–977). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
van der Linden, W. J. (1999). A procedure for empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21–29.
van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Optimal assembly of tests with item sets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 225–240.
van der Linden, W. J. (2001a). Adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 343–355.
van der Linden, W. J. (2001b). On complexity in computer-based testing. In G. N. Mills, M. Potenza, J. J. Fremer & W. Ward (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van der Linden, W. J. (2005a). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283–302.
van der Linden, W. J. (2005b). Linear models for optimal test design. New York: Springer-Verlag.
van der Linden, W. J. (2006). A lognormal model for response times on test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 181–204.
van der Linden, W. J. (2009a). Predictive control of speededness in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 25–41.
van der Linden, W. J. (2009b). Local observed-score equating. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for equating, scaling, and linking. New York: Springer-Verlag. In press.
van der Linden, W. J. & Adema, J. J. (1998). Simultaneous assembly of multiple test forms. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 185–198 [Addendum in Vol. 36, 90–91].
van der Linden, W. J. & Chang, H.-H. (2003). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107–120.
van der Linden, W. J. & Luecht, R. M. (1998). Observed equating as a test assembly problem. Psychometrika, 62, 401–418.
van der Linden, W. J. & Reese, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259–270.
van der Linden, W. J. & Veldkamp, B. P. (2007). Conditional item-exposure control in adaptive testing using item-ineligibility probabilities. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 398–418.
Veldkamp, B. P. & van der Linden, W. J. (2008). A multiple-shadow-test approach to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in adaptive testing. International Journal of Testing, 8, 272–289.
Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T. & Du, Z. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3PL model useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 245–269). Boston: Kluwer-Nijh of Publishing.
Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T. & Wang, X. (2007). Testlet response theory and its applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wainer, H. & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters in computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Linden, W.J. (2009). Constrained Adaptive Testing with Shadow Tests. In: van der Linden, W., Glas, C. (eds) Elements of Adaptive Testing. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-85459-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85461-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)