Skip to main content

Attention

  • Reference work entry

Synonyms

Concentration; Focus; Vigilance

Definition

Cognitive processes that enable the selection of, focus on, and sustained processing of information. The object of attention can either be environmental stimuli actively being processed by sensory systems, or associative information and response alternatives generated by ongoing cognitive activity.

Historical Background

Attention is subjectively self-evident to all people, and terms that referred to attention-type experiences have been described by philosophers through the ages. The concept of attention is strongly linked in the philosophy to the nature of consciousness, self-awareness, and most theories of the “mind.” Accordingly, attention has been the subject of psychological inquiry from the beginning of this scientific discipline. The writings of William James captured this fact, as evident from this well-known excerpt from his Principles of Psychology (1898).

Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Cohen, R. A. (1993) Neuropsychology of Attention. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. A., Meadows, M. E., Kaplan, R. F., & Wilkinson, H. (1994) Habituation and sensitization of the OR following bilateral cingulate damage. Neuropsychologia, 32(5), 609–617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, W. P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1967). Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 153–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1979). Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Research, 178, 363–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963) Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (l989). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. E., & Bushnell, M. D. (l981). Behavioral enhancement of visual response in monkey cerebral cortex. II. Modulation in frontal eye fields specifically related to saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 783–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (l993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (3rd ed., pp. 279–336). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., & Watson, R. T. (l983). Directional hypokinesia in neglect. Neurology, 2(33), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., Valenstein, E., & Goldberg, M. E. (1988). Attention: Behavior and neural mechanisms. Attention, 11, 461–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. (Vol. 1., pp. 403–404). New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. F., Verfaellie, M., DeWitt, L. D., & Caplan, L. R. (1990). Effects of changes in stimulus contingency on visual extinction. Neurology, 40(8), 1299–1301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., & Nettleton, N. C. (1994). Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: Implications for a multi-component model of neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 57(5), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam, M. A. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Archives of Neurology, 10, 304–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, R. (1984). Sustained attention in detection and discrimination. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. (pp. 243–289). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo JV, Fox PT, Raichle ME (1991). Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 349(6304):61–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. A., & Rafal, R. D. (l987). How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia, 25(lA), 135–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Facilitation and inhibition in shifts of visual attention. In H. Bouma & D. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. H., & McGuinness, D. (1975). Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. Psychological Review, 82, 116–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: The University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435–444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Heilman, K. M., Cauthen, J. C., & King, F. A. (1973). Neglect after cingulotomy. Neurology, 23, 1003–1007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, R. H., Goldberg, M. E., Robinson, D. L. (1982). Brain mechanisms of visual attention. Scientific American, 246(6):124–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Cohen, R.A. (2011). Attention. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1267

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1267

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79947-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79948-3

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics