Abstract
This paper contributes to the literature on information systems development life cycle (SDLC) by presenting an enhanced SDLC model, which integrated three interdependent and complementary, but different SDLCs. It is based on integration of the traditional and well-established idea of custom development with package development and commercially off the shelf (COTS) selection and implementation. Package development includes all software made for a market, whereas COTS selection and implementation refers to the selection and implementation of package software. Although there are many similarities between the life cycles, many differences are important to understand. We highlight both the differences and the intersection between the life cycles and outline an integrated SDLC model, which will be used to discuss future research and curricula issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alter, S. (1999) A general, yet useful theory of information systems. Communications AIS 1(13) .
Andersson, B. and Hedman, J. (2006) Issues in the development of a mobile based communication platform for the Swedish Police Force and appointed security guards. 3rd International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Newark.
Andersson, R. and Nilsson, A. (1996) The standard application package market – An industry in transition? In: M. Lundeberg and B. Sundgren (Eds.). Advancing Your Business: People and Information Systems in Consert. Sweden: EFI, Stockholm School of Economics.
Avison, D.E. and Fitzgerald, G. (2006) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools, 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Boehm, B.W. (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer 21(5), 61–72.
Carmel, E. (1997) American hegemony in packaged software trade and the culture of software. The Information Society 13(1), 125–142.
Carmel, E. and Becker, S. (1995) A process model for packaged software development. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management 41(5), 50–61.
Carmel, E. and Sawyer, S. (1998) Packaged software development teams: What makes them different?Information Technology and People11 (1), 7–19.
George, J. (2000) The origins of software: Acquiring systems at the end of the century. In R. Zmud (Ed.).Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past. Cincinnati, Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, pp. 263–284.
Hedman, J. (2003) On enterprise systems artifacts: Changes in information systems development and evaluation, Doctoral thesis, Department of Informatics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden. .
Hedman, J. (2004) Understanding ERP implementation methods: The case of ASAP. 27th IRIS, Falkenberg.
Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. (1998) A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Information Systems Research 9(2), 164–193.
Lind, M. (2002) Dividing businesses into processes – Foundations for modelling essentials. In: K. Liu, R.J. Clarke, P.B. Andersen, R.K. Stamper, E. Abou-Zeid (Eds.). IFIP TC8/WG8.1 Working Conference on Organizational Semiotics: Evolving a Science of Information Systems. Boston: Kluwer.
Markus, L. and Tanis, C. (2000) The enterprise systems experience – From adoption to success. In:R. Zmud (Ed.). Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past. Cincinnati, Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, pp. 173–207.
Regnell, B., Höst, M., Dag och Natt, J., Beremark, P. and Hjelm, T. (2001) An industrial case study on distributed prioritisation in market driven requirements engineering for packaged software. Requirements Engineering 6, 51–62.
Rosemann, M. (2001) Requirements engineering for enterprise systems. 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA.
Sawyer, S. (2000) Packaged software: Implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development. European Journal of Information Systems 9, 47–58.
Sawyer, S. (2001) A market-based perspective on information system development. Communication of the ACM 44(11), 97–102.
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the helpful comments from the anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hedman, J., Lind, M. (2009). Is There Only One Systems Development Life Cycle?. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30403-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68772-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)