Skip to main content

Constructing Meaningful Sustainability Indices

  • Chapter
Applied Research in Environmental Economics

Part of the book series: ZEW Economic Studies ((ZEW,volume 31))

Abstract

This paper surveys and evaluates the possibilities and limitations of sustainability indices from the point of view of meaningfulness. A sustainability index is defined as meaningful if it allows unambiguous orderings of the relevant ‘situations’ over time independent of the measurement units in which the variables describing the situations are expressed. The cases of commensurability and incommensurability are distinguished. In the former, the comparison of situations is unambiguous be-cause all legitimate choices of measurement units can be accommodated on the basis of exogenously given relationships among the variables. These relationships may define a monetary welfare-metric or a bio-physical effects-metric. In the case of incommensurability, common approaches (both cardinal and ordinal) may fail to yield meaningful indices. A systematic assessment of which indices are meaningful in which circumstances is provided.

Acknowledgement

I am grateful to Udo Ebert, Friedrich Schneider, Armin Schmutzler, Christoph Weber, Cees Withagen and Pascal Wolff for useful comments on an earlier version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adriaanse, A. (1993), Environmental Policy Performance Indicators, SDU, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebotarev, P.Y. and E. Shamis (1998), Characterizations of Scoring Methods for Preference Aggregation, Annals of Operations Research 80, 299–332.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.S. and M. Weale (1992), On Measuring the Quality of Life, World Development 20, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Butter, F.A.G. and J.A.C. van der Eyden (1998), A Pilot Index for Environmental Policy in the Netherlands, Energy Policy 26, 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U. and H. Welsch (2004), Meaningful Environmental Indices: A Social Choice Approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U. and H. Welsch (2002), Meaningful Environmental Indices: A Social Choice Approach, Discussion Paper V-242-02, Department of Economics, University of Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESI (2001), Environmental Sustainability Index 2001, An Initiative of the Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force, www.ciesin.columbia.edu/indicators/ESI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C., J. Parker, and S. Peake (1992), A Pilot Environmental Index for the UK in the 1980s, Energy Policy 20, 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, N. (2000), Measuring Environmental Quality: An Index of Pollution, Ecological Economics 35, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993), OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews: A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment, Environment Monographs No. 83, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D., D.H. Krantz, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky (1990), Foundations of Measurement, Vol. III, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W. (1978), Environmental Indices: Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfanzagl, J. (1971), Theory of Measurement, 2nd edition, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F.S. (1979), Measurement Theory with Applications to Decision-Making, Utility and the Social Sciences, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. (1997), The Quality of Life: An International Comparison Based on Ordinal Measures, Applied Economics Letters 4, 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and G. Atkinson (1993), Capital Theory and the Measurement of Sustainable Development: An Indicator of Weak Sustainability, Ecological Economics 8, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and D.B. van Veen-Groot (2001), Constructing Aggregate Environmental-Economic Indicators: A Comparison of 12 OECD Countries, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Welsch, H. (2005). Constructing Meaningful Sustainability Indices. In: Böhringer, C., Lange, A. (eds) Applied Research in Environmental Economics. ZEW Economic Studies, vol 31. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1645-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics