Skip to main content

The Application of Action Learning and Action Research in Collaborative Improvement within the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise

  • Chapter
Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management

Summary

Increasingly organizations have to identify and implement improvement initiatives in an inter-organizational context. Implementing collaborative improvement is fraught with difficulties that encompass a wide array of intra- and inter-organizational change issues and working practices. In order to overcome these difficulties, explicit attention should be paid to the accumulation and development of knowledge and to the long-term development of a capability for learning and continuous improvement between organizations. This paper describes the application of an Action Learning and Action Research approach in collaborative improvement within an Extended Manufacturing Enterprise in the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9 References

  • Bartezzaghi, E., Sassatelli, M. (2001): Migliorare le reti di fornitura: sviluppo delle competenze e delle opportunità tecnologiche (Improving supply networks: development of competences and technological opportunities), Franco Angeli editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Kaplinsky, R., Lamming, R. (2003): Putting supply chain learning into practice, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2): 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Tsekouras, G. (2001): Developing learning networks, in: AI and Society, 15: 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H., Nielsen, L. B., Nørretranders, T., Gertsen, F. (2000): CI changes: from suggestion box to organisational learning, Continuous Improvement in Europe and Australia, Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. S., Fan, I. S. (1993): The extended manufacturing enterprise: its nature and its needs, International journal of technology management, 8(3,4,5): 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagliano, R., Caniato, F., Corso, M., Spina, G. (2002): “Fostering Collaborative Improvement in Extended Manufacturing Enterprises: A Preliminary Theory”, in Smeds, R. (ed.): Continuous Innovation in Business — Processes and Networks, Espoo, Finland, Helsinki University of Technology: p. 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. (1998). Developing Network Organizations: Learning form Practice and Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (1992): Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Pitman Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D., Brannick, T. (2001): Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D. (2002): Action Research for Operations Management, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2): 220–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D., Brennan, L. (2004): Organizing for Research and Action: Implementing Action Researcher Networks, in: Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(1): 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D. (2004): Action Learning: towards a framework in inter-organizational settings, in: Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotlich, D., Noel, J. (1998): Action Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., Huxham, C. (1996): Action Research for the study of organizations, in: Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Nord, W. (eds.): Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage Publications, London, p. 526–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (1998): Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Perseus Books, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson, A., Aastrup, J. (2003): Quality criteria for qualitative inquiries in logistics, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 144: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M. (1996): Supply chain management: relationships, chains and networks, in: British Journal of management, 7, Special Issue, Mar: S63–S81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C., Cousins, P. D. (1999): Developing the Concept of Supply Strategy, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(7): 650–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R. C. (1993): Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply, London, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, F. (1999), Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies, in: Information Technology & People, 12(2): 148–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, M. (1999): Action learning in action, Palo Alto, CA, Davies-Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näslund, D., (2002): Logistics needs qualitative research — especially action research, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution and & Logistics Management, 32(5): 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., Eccles, R.G. (1992): Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M. (1996): Action learning for managers, Lemos & Crane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1994): Competing for future survival, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. (1998): ABC of Action Learning, Lemos & Crane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., Van De Ven, A. H., (1992): Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, in: Strategic Management Journal 13(7): 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockhart, J, Short, J. (1990): The networked organization and the management of interdependence, in: Scott-Morton, M. (ed.): The Corporation of the 1990s, Oxford University Press, New York: p. 189–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, in: Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1998): Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and tangible assets, in: California Management Review, 40(3): 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, K. (1999): Action Learning: A Practical Guide. Gower, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. (1995): Action Research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(12): 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorks, L., O’Neil, J., Marsick, V. (1999): Action Learning: Successful Strategies for Individual, Team and Organizational Development, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Middel Ir., R., Brennan, L., Coghlan, D., Coughlan, P. (2005). The Application of Action Learning and Action Research in Collaborative Improvement within the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise. In: Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Müller, M., Reiner, G. (eds) Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics