Skip to main content

Use of case-based reasoning in the domain of building regulations

  • Applications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 984))

Abstract

In traditional legal decision support systems, it has been regarded as natural to represent statutes in terms of decision rules and to link these to a separate case-based reasoning system for handling precedent. Statutory legal rules used in these systems are formal and prescriptive. Building regulations in Scotland are part of statute law and constitute part of a legal system together with case histories. In recent years, the regulations have been becoming less prescriptive and more emphasis has been put onto the interpretive use of the regulations. In developing a system which can assist domain experts in interpreting the regulations, this trend has presented us with difficulties in employing this traditional approach and has led us to a unified case-based model of the regulations and case histories. In this paper, we first describe the characteristics of the regulations and the activities involved in this domain. Second, we explain the reason why we abandoned the traditional approach. Third, we describe the system which has been developed using this case-based model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Branting, L.K.: Building Explanations from Rules and Structureed Cases. International journal of man-machine studies 34 (1991) 797–837.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.L.: gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6:4 (October 1988) 303–331.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: How to make a language user. In Organisation of Memory (1972). E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (Eds.). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gentner, D.: Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science 7 (1983) 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holyoak, K.J., Thagard, P.: Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13 (1989) 295–355.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.: Issues as Elements of Information Systems (1970). Working Paper. Center for Planning and Development Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rissland, E.L.: Artificial Intelligence and Law. The Yale Law Journal 99 (1990) 1957–1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B.: CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture. International journal of man-machine studies 34 (1991) 839–887.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Building Standards (Scotland) Regulations 1981 (1981). Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sergot, M.: Representing Legislation As Logic Programs (1985). Tech. Report. Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science and Technology, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sergot, M., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P., Cory, H.T.: The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Communications of the ACM 29:5 (May 1986) 370–386.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, D.: Intelligent Information Systems for Building Standards. Proceedings of EuropIA 88, Paris (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Susskind, R.: Expert Systems in Law (1987). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thagard, P., Holyoak, K.J.: Why Indexing is the Wrong Way to Think about Analog Retrieval. Proceedings of DARPA Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (1989) 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toulmin, S.: The uses of argument (1958). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walker, R.F., Oskamp, A., Schrickx, J.A., Opdorp, G.J.V., Berg, P.H.V.D.: PROLEXS: Creating Law and Order in a Heterogeneous Domain. International journal of man-machine studies 35 (1991) 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waterman, D.A., Paul, J., Peterson, M.A.: Expert Systems for Legal Decision Making. Expert Systems 3:4 (1986) 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, S.-A., Robertson, D., Lee, J.: KICS: A Knowledge-Intensive Case-Based Reasoning System for Statutory Building Regulations and Case Histories. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (June 1993) 254–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Paul Haton Mark Keane Michel Manago

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, SA., Robertson, D., Lee, J. (1995). Use of case-based reasoning in the domain of building regulations. In: Haton, JP., Keane, M., Manago, M. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60364-6_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60364-6_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60364-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45052-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics