Skip to main content

Bayesian Case Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2416))

Abstract

Bayesian Case Reconstruction (BCR) is a case-based technique that broadens the coverage of a case library by sampling and recombining pieces of existing cases to construct a large set of “plausible” cases. It employs a Bayesian Belief Network to evaluate whether implicit dependencies within the original cases have been maintained. The belief network is constructed from the expert’s limited understanding of the domain theory combined with the data available in the case library. The cases are the primary reasoning vehicle. The belief network leverages the available domain model to help evaluate whether the “plausible” cases have maintained the necessary internal context. BCR is applied to the design of screening experiments for Macromolecular Crystallization in the Probabilistic Screen Design program. We describe BCR and provide an empirical comparison of the Probabilistic Screen Design program against the current practice in Macromolecular Crystallization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carter Jr., C.W. & Carter, C.W. (1979) Protein Crystallization Using Incomplete Factorial Experiments. J. Biol. Chem., 254: p. 12219–12223.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hennessy, D., Gopalakrishnan, V., Buchanan, B.G., Rosenberg, J.M., and Subramanian, D., (1994) “Induction of Rules for Biological Macromolecular Crystallization”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp. 179–187, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilliland, G.C. (1987) A biological macromolecule crystallization database: a basis for a crystallization strategy. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Protein Crystal Growth; A FEBS Advanced Lecture Course. Bischenberg, Strasbourg, France: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hennessy, D., Buchanan, B.G., Subramanian, D., Wilkosz, P.A., & Rosenberg, J. M., (2000). “Statistical Methods for the Objective Design of Screening Procedures for Macromolecular Crystallization”, Acta Crystallographica Section D D56, 817–827.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jurisica, I., Rogers, P., Glasgow, J., Fortier, S., Luft, J., Wolfley, J., Bianca, M., Weeks, D., DeTitta, G.T. (2001) Intelligent Decision Support for Protein Crystal Growth. To appear in IBM Systems Journal, Special issue on Deep Computing for Life Sciences, 40(2): 394–409

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hennessy, D.N. & Hinkle, D. (1992). Applying case-based reasoning to autoclave loading. IEEE Expert 7(5): 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Redmond, M.A. (1990). What should I do now? Using goal sequitor knowledge to choose the next problem-solving step. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Northvale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breese, J. S., & Heckerman, D. (1995). Decision-theoretic case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 56–63). Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myllymaki, P, & Tirri, H. (1993). Massively parallel case-based reasoning with probabilistic similarity metrics. Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (pp. 145–154). Kaiserlautern, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aha, D. W. & Chang, L. W. (1996). Cooperative Bayesian and Case-Based Reasoning for Solving Multiagent Planning Tasks. NCARAI Technical Report AIC-96-005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kasif, S., Salzberg, S., Waltz, D., Rachlin, J. & Aha, D. W. (1998). A probabilistic framework for memory-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 104(1–2), 297–312.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J. H. & Pearl, J. (1983). A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems, in: Proceedings of the 8 th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 190–193), Karlsruhe, West Germany

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Mateo, California.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Mateo, California.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McPherson, A. (1990). Current Approaches to Macromolecular Crystallization. European Journal of Biochemistry, 189, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hennessy, D.N., Buchanan, B.G., Rosenberg, J.M. (2002). Bayesian Case Reconstruction. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics